Five Features EVERY Car Should Have -- But Are They Worth The Cost?

Five Features EVERY Car Should Have -- But Are They Worth The Cost?
Although we may not pay for the cost of new, standardized safety changes directly, we do absorb the costs associated with certain equipment in one form or another.

Why else do you think cars are becoming more expensive?

Take, for example, a statistic that Scott Burgess points out in his writing. By 2014 every vehicle will be required to feature a back up camera so people don't get run over. Oh-kay, valid concern I guess. Here's the rub though: it is said to cost an estimated $1.9 billion and $2.7 billion. As Burgess points out the DOT guesses that the back up cameras will save approximately 95 to 112 people a year.

I mean, don't get me wrong I am not the grim reaper here but considering the amount of investment involved when perfectly able drivers can be more cautious is bordering on ridiculous.

Here's an idea that may actually work: Make the ability to obtain a license stricter and more costly. Not only would it generate an increased revenue but driver's with better training would create a safer driving environment.

With that all said, what do you think of the FIVE features Burgess points out? Do we need more? Anything specific you want to address?


**Click "Read Article" for the rest of the five features every car should have


Sometimes the government demands new vehicle features in the name of safety, the environment or some other reason.

Sometimes, these mandates are good: Electronic stability control on all new vehicles will save lives and make roads safer. New roof crush standards may do the same...

...While I have no power to force carmakers to comply, here are five features that every car and truck should have. Not for safety or the environment, but simply because these are some of the best features found in vehicles today. They are mostly inexpensive and just make driving a little bit easier.


No. 1: The capless fuel cap

Ford Motor Co. began deploying this neat little feature a few years ago. Ford calls it Easy Fuel, and eventually this amenity will make it on nearly every vehicle it manufactures. Instead of a traditional twist-off cap, the capless system starts with a cap with a hole in it....



[Source: The Detroit News]


SPIED! FIRST Look Next-Gen Ford Escape Photo Gallery

2012 Audi A5 S5 Photo Gallery

2011 ALMS Northeast Grand Prix Photo Gallery

Cars And Parades! Tribute To The Fourth Of July Photo Gallery

Eurocar Heaven! Best Of Rome Photo Gallery

2012 MINI Coupe Photo Gallery


AutoSpies.com Photo Galleries

If you want to see your photos running on our homepage photo ticker, be sure to upload your photos on the go by sending them to Mobile@AutoSpies.com

Share on Facebook



Read Article

chris760chris760 - 7/19/2011 5:10:04 AM
+1 Boost
Blind spot detection --- Seriously? Adjust your mirrors smartly, pay attention to your surroundings and watch your rearview mirror for cars coming up. Seriously unnecessary and expensive


WorldofLuxuryWorldofLuxury - 7/19/2011 5:13:19 AM
+1 Boost
That capless fuel thing is so simple, but Ford patented it. Kudos, I suppose.


dstampferdstampfer - 7/19/2011 1:03:46 PM
+1 Boost
1) Capless Fuel Filler-- Cool idea, but totally unnecessary-- learn to just tighten the fuel cap-- mine works well.

2) Auto Up/Down Windows- and to think we lived with manual cranks for years- really not too big a deal, but my car has them and it's a useful feature. Still, how much effort does it really take for a passenger to hold his button down to lower or raise the window.

3) Bluetooth integration - Agree on this one and most new cars already have or offer this anyway-- They really do need to work on incorporating noise canceling technology to make the sound better for the party on the other end.

4) 3-blink blinkers-- it's a nifty idea in theory and I have this on my E90 335i. Again, don't see this as a huge advantage-- if fact it takes some effort to train yourself (being in the habit already of manually canceling the blinker) not to put the opposite blinker on when you mistakenly try to cancel it. A light press up or down causes a 3 blink flash, while a hard press causes normal activation that only cancels manually or if you turn 90 degrees. If you only drove a car with this feature from day one, it would work out better, but if you drive cars with and without it, you will invariably get frustrated with the feature.

5) Blind Spot Warning - ABSOLUTELY NOT-- this one makes my blood boil, but I can only post the rationale on an enthusiast site. As per chris760--- learn to check your mirrors, be aware of your surrounding, and drive. All we need is millions of cars with this safety feature lulling people into a sense of security and then not being fully alert to their surroundings. Some late model BMW's, Audi's, and Merc's, Acura's have this already and I'm sure there are others. Hopefully people just shut it off. My real HATE for this is that most are Radar based and make my Valentine One go nuts. Since it reads the number of sources, I can say there must be 4-5 radar emitters in an Audi S5 -- if you are behind one within a quarter mile, the detector will alarm. At least I know what it is, but it's an annoying disturbance only corrected by passing the offending car. Radar detection is useless with one of these in range-- now imaging if all cars had them-- forget being able to use a radar detector at all. On a related note, laser based cruise control is sometimes adapted for collision avoidance- meaning that the car will brake if it senses an impending collision-- Infiniti's and some Acura's have this feature-- as a result, the laser is on all the time, not just when cruise is active. If one of these vehicles is behind you or passes you in the opposite direction, you get a laser alarm from the Valentine One. Sigh..... Can't see this turning out for the better if more cars get these features.

Lastly, on the back up camera issue-- I think it would be very helpful. On my wife's truck, it is very useful to have the look down view to see your own bumper and the bumper of the car you are parking in front


dstampferdstampfer - 7/20/2011 9:43:01 AM
+1 Boost
2 more features we should all have

1) Sending Locations from Internet to the Nav--- I love this about my E90 335i--- if you go to Google Maps and find a location, one of the features is called Send To Car-- doing this causes the details to show up in a message queue in the car. If you play the feature, you can see which other manufacturers offer this feature. If the location chosen is say a business or restaurant, then the phone number gets transferred too. You then have the option of navigating to the location or calling a number if part of the message. It's nice not having to enter a location manually.

2) Direct Tire Pressure Monitoring with pressure readout. All new cars have monitoring. My last vehicle (Caddy CTS-V '07) and I assume most GM vehicles, as well as, my wifes Acura MDX have a nice little pictogram showing the pressure in each tire at all times. This is a fabulous feature and makes it easy to match them and regulate this within 1 PSI if desired. My BMW ('09) has direct monitoring of each tire, but only shows you a green light vs. error for each tire and will not alarm unless the pressure is really low. The design of the system is really behind the times for a technologically advanced company like BMW. There is no way to check the actual pressure without measuring it at the valve stem.


George007George007 - 8/24/2011 2:14:26 PM
+1 Boost
The Author of this post (Agent00R) is everything that is ,
the question should be not "how much will it cost",
but "can we do it";
and we CAN do it sir.
If it was up to people like this author of this here article, we'd still be in the dark ages, because new things cost money. Take your one-sided love for money and shove it, and give me the products of our civilization so that I can enjoy my existence. And it doesn't matter how much it costs, because I don't have the "money fetish".


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC