NTSB Recommends A National Ban On Using Cell Phones While Operating A Motor Vehicles

NTSB Recommends A National Ban On Using Cell Phones While Operating A Motor Vehicles
Following today's Board meeting on the 2010 multi-vehicle highway accident in Gray Summit, Missouri, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) called for the first-ever nationwide ban on driver use of personal electronic devices (PEDs) while operating a motor vehicle.

The safety recommendation specifically calls for the 50 states and the District of Columbia to ban the nonemergency use of portable electronic devices (other than those designed to support the driving task) for all drivers. The safety recommendation also urges use of the NHTSA model of high-visibility enforcement to support these bans and implementation of targeted communication campaigns to inform motorists of the new law and heightened enforcement.

"According to NHTSA, more than 3,000 people lost their lives last year in distraction-related accidents", said Chairman Deborah A.P. Hersman. "It is time for all of us to stand up for safety by turning off electronic devices when driving."

"No call, no text, no update, is worth a human life."

On August 5, 2010, on a section of Interstate 44 in Gray Summit, Missouri, a pickup truck ran into the back of a truck-tractor that had slowed due to an active construction zone. The pickup truck, in turn, was struck from behind by a school bus. That school bus was then hit by a second school bus that had been following. As a result, two people died and 38 others were injured.

The NTSB's investigation revealed that the pickup driver sent and received 11 text messages in the 11 minutes preceding the accident. The last text was received moments before the pickup struck the truck-tractor.

The Missouri accident is the most recent distraction accident the NTSB has investigated. However, the first investigation involving distraction from a wireless electronic device occurred in 2002, when a novice driver, distracted by a conversation on her cell phone, veered off the roadway in Largo, Maryland, crossed the median, flipped the car over, and killed five people.

Since then, the NTSB has seen the deadliness of distraction across all modes of transportation.

In 2004, an experienced motorcoach driver, distracted on his hands-free cell phone, failed to move to the center lane and struck the underside of an arched stone bridge on the George Washington Parkway in Alexandria, Virginia. Eleven of the 27 high school students were injured;
In the 2008 collision of a commuter train with a freight train in Chatsworth, California, the commuter train engineer, who had a history of using his cell phone for personal communications while on duty, ran a red signal while texting. That train collided head on with a freight train - killing 25 and injuring dozens;
  • In 2009, two airline pilots were out of radio communication with air traffic control for more than an hour because they were distracted by their personal laptops. They overflew their destination by more than 100 miles, only realizing their error when a flight attendant inquired about preparing for arrival.
  • In Philadelphia in 2010, a barge being towed by a tugboat ran over an amphibious "duck" boat in the Delaware River, killing two Hungarian tourists. The tugboat mate failed to maintain a proper lookout due to repeated use of a cell-phone and laptop computer;
  • In 2010, near Munfordville, Kentucky, a truck-tractor in combination with a 53-foot-long trailer, left its lane, crossed the median and collided with a 15-passenger van. The truck driver failed to maintain control of his vehicle because he was distracted by use of his cell-phone. The accident resulted in 11 fatalities
  • In the last two decades, there has been exponential growth in the use of cell-phone and personal electronic devices. Globally, there are 5.3 billion mobile phone subscribers or 77 percent of the world population. In the United States, that percentage is even higher - it exceeds 100 percent.

Further, a Virginia Tech Transportation Institute study of commercial drivers found that a safety-critical event is 163 times more likely if a driver is texting, e-mailing, or accessing the Internet.

"The data is clear; the time to act is now. How many more lives will be lost before we, as a society, change our attitudes about the deadliness of distractions?" Hersman said.

A synopsis of the NTSB report, including the probable cause, findings, and a complete list of the safety recommendations, will be available online after the meeting.

The NTSB's full report will be available on the website in several weeks.




jackpulsjackpuls - 12/13/2011 4:04:02 PM
0 Boost
What next... Passenger seating on the roof, trailers for children? Idiots.


AgentOrangeAgentOrange - 12/13/2011 5:32:23 PM
+7 Boost
'bout gawd-damned time.
Too many fukin idiots on the road as it is without the electronic distractions.


BondMI6BondMI6 - 12/13/2011 5:55:53 PM
+3 Boost
Agent O your comment is as lame as it is ignorant.

Did the government ban 8 tracks and cassetts even though they caused a very REAL distraction and cost lives back in the 70's/80's????

Does the government propose a new prohibition based on THOUSANDS of more lives lost to drunk driving?

NO.

Instead they want a total ban including hands free of cell phones so they can feel good about alleviating all the pressure they are getting from special interest groups on this subject.

Do NOT get me wrong- a texting driver is dangerous and there should be laws. BUT...... eliminating ALL cell phone use including hands-free is an egregious smack at our civil liberties and an excuse for Washington to feel like they actually accomplished something this year.

-Bond


internationalmanofmysteryinternationalmanofmystery - 12/14/2011 8:27:20 AM
0 Boost
Fill me in:

What special interest groups would benefit by this?



"...an excuse for Washington to feel like they actually accomplished something this year."

They need this in an election year! I see! I see!! Piss off the electorate!! Makes sense!!!

(sarcasm added)




nguyenvuminhnguyenvuminh - 12/13/2011 8:48:56 PM
+2 Boost
good.


quizzquizz - 12/13/2011 10:41:49 PM
0 Boost
More accidents are caused by drivers talking to their passengers than anything else. Look at the stats, for every passenger you add into a car, you double the likelihood that a teen gets into an accident. Teens should only be allowed to drive 2 seaters.

Obviously, texting while driving is stupid, but talking on the phone is no more distracting than talking to a passenger. It's not the dialing that creates risk, it's the distraction from conversation.


internationalmanofmysteryinternationalmanofmystery - 12/14/2011 8:32:46 AM
+2 Boost
"NTSB Recommends A National Ban On Using Cell Phones While Operating A Motor Vehicles"


You have MY full support!! And it does say ONLY those OPERATING!!! If the call or text is that important, then let your chauffeur drive!! ;)



ChiAutoGuyChiAutoGuy - 12/14/2011 9:03:01 AM
+3 Boost
About time - Hope this goes into law ASAP...

Also - I believe that hands free devices would be allowed - It really pisses me off when I see someone in a nice MB, etc obviously BT enabled wandering about the road talking on the phone the old fashioned way


MeanVulcanMeanVulcan - 12/14/2011 10:19:25 AM
-2 Boost
A few accidents and the reaction is OVERACTION,a full ban on all devices! How stupid are we getting? Accidents are caused by distractions, such as men watching women ... should we ban women on the streets?, also distractions due to baby in rear seat, should we ban babies in a car?, drinking coffee, should we ban coffee?, inserting a CD, should we ban players?... the point is there area million reasons why we have accidents and the facts are that deaths due to car accidents keeps decreasing, not increasing.

Our kids get hurt playing sports, should we ban sports?, we slip and fall on slippery floors, should we ban slippery materials like marble?, delivery bikers get killed in traffic accidents, should we ban delivery bikers?

This mentality of overreaction can only lead to a complete Nanny state where we all wear bubble suits and walk around in streets with bumper walls and where the speed limit is 10 mph.

Find a better solution. Perhaps a built-in app that prevents texting and MANUAL dialing while one is moving past 5 mph. Voice activation and one touch dialing is much less distracting.


Joe_LimonJoe_Limon - 12/14/2011 10:41:47 AM
+2 Boost
Accident rates are the lowest since 1949 apparently but due to the hyper-sensationalization the media is known for, it is portrayed as if distracted driving is new, and the biggest threat to our lives currently. I'm ok if they enforce a ban, just increase the speed limit... please?


theman440theman440 - 12/14/2011 11:14:47 AM
+4 Boost
You are looking at this from the wrong perspective...


theman440theman440 - 12/14/2011 11:12:42 AM
+4 Boost
I'm all for civil liberty - but this just makes sense. If your family was killed by some idiot who was texting while driving you'd be all for it. Especially when that person only gets 18 months years for vehicular manslaughter.


BondMI6BondMI6 - 12/14/2011 2:28:07 PM
+1 Boost
Not if it bans ALL usage- including hands free. How does that make sense?

So again using your rational 440 then if I fall and slip in the bathroom and die then tile floors should be banned? Because household accidents cause waaaaaaay more deaths annually then cell phones. Look it up. The stats don't lie.

Your overreaction is very disturbing. A better way would be to do what most states are already doing- banning non-hands free usage in cars.


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC