Strong initial quality of 2009 model-year vehicles—which were produced during one of the toughest years for the automotive industry—has translated into historically high levels of vehicle dependability in 2012, according to the J.D. Power and Associates 2012 U.S. Vehicle Dependability Study(SM) (VDS) released today.
The study measures problems experienced during the past 12 months by original owners of three-year-old (2009 model-year) vehicles. Overall dependability is determined by the level of problems experienced per 100 vehicles (PP100), with a lower score reflecting higher quality.
In 2012, overall vehicle dependability averages 132 PP100—an improvement of 13 percent from the 2011 average of 151—which is the lowest problem rate since the inception of the study in 1990. The strong dependability of these models reflects their high levels of initial quality when measured three years ago. According to the J.D. Power and Associates 2009 Initial Quality Study(SM), overall initial quality of 2009 model-year vehicles was, at the time, the highest level of initial quality since the inaugural IQS in 1987.
Fully 25 of 32 brands have improved in dependability from 2011, while only six have declined and one has remained stable. Domestic nameplates have improved in 2012 at a slightly faster rate than imports, narrowing the dependability gap to 13 PP100 from 18 PP100 in 2011.
"Despite facing immense challenges in 2009, automakers placed a keen focus on delivering outstanding levels of quality, which they understood would be essential to their long-term success," said David Sargent, vice president of global automotive at J.D. Power and Associates. "Three years later, owners of these models are enjoying unprecedented levels of vehicle dependability and manufacturers are experiencing market recovery. This is good news both for owners—who are holding onto their vehicles for longer than ever—and manufacturers, since perception of quality and dependability is a critical factor in vehicle purchase decisions."
However, according to Sargent, there are several brands that have performed very well in dependability during the past several years but still face challenges with customer perceptions of their reliability. In particular, during the past four years, models from Buick, Cadillac, Ford, Hyundai and Lincoln have achieved consistently strong levels of dependability, but still have relatively high proportions of new-vehicle buyers expressing reliability concerns.1
"Building vehicles with high levels of dependability is obviously a necessary element in reshaping consumer perceptions," said Sargent. "Negative quality perceptions are notoriously difficult to change, and it takes considerable time, but effectively communicating improvements in dependability may reduce concerns, and by extension, help new-vehicle sales."
Highest-Ranked Nameplates and Models
Lexus ranks highest in vehicle dependability among all nameplates in 2012. In addition, the Lexus LS has the fewest problems in the industry, with just 72 PP100. Rounding out the five highest-ranking nameplates are Porsche, Cadillac, Toyota and Scion, respectively. MINI and Scion post the greatest year-over-year improvements from 2011—by 60 PP100 and 55 PP100, respectively.
Toyota Motor Corporation continues to perform well in long-term dependability and garners eight segment awards—more than any other automaker in 2012—for the Lexus ES 350 (in a tie with the Lincoln MKZ); Lexus RX 350; Scion tC; Scion xB; Toyota Prius; Toyota Sienna; Toyota Tundra; and Toyota Yaris.
Ford Motor Company receives three model awards for the Ford Explorer (in a tie with the Nissan Murano); Ford Fusion; and Lincoln MKZ (in a tie). General Motors (Buick Lucerne and Chevrolet Equinox) and Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. (Nissan Frontier and Nissan Murano, in a tie with the Ford Explorer) each receive two awards. In addition, the Hyundai Genesis also receives an award. Although there are no awards in their respective segments due to an insufficient number of award-eligible models, or insufficient market share of award-eligible models in the segment, these models also perform particularly well: Ford Mustang, GMC Yukon and Porsche 911.
J.D. Power and Associates offers the following tips for consumers regarding vehicle dependability:
- Consumer perceptions of vehicle quality and dependability are often based on historical experiences or anecdotes and may be out of line with the current reality. Consumers should gather as much information as they can on the latest models from a variety of sources to make an informed decision.
- Historically, initial quality has been a good indicator of likely long-term dependability. If a model has high levels of quality when new, it is more likely to be dependable over the long term.
- Vehicle dependability is at an all-time high and resale values are also very high by historical standards. If your vehicle has been properly maintained and is in good working condition, it may be worth more than you think if you are considering trading it in.
The Vehicle Dependability Study is used extensively by vehicle manufacturers worldwide to help design and build better vehicles—which typically translates to higher resale values and higher customer loyalty. It also helps consumers make more-informed choices for both new- and used-vehicle purchases.
The 2012 Vehicle Dependability Study is based on responses from more than 31,000 original owners of 2009 model-year vehicles after three years of ownership. The study was fielded between October and December 2011.
Find more detailed information on vehicle dependability, as well as model photos and specs, by reading an article and reviewing brand and segment dependability ratings at JDPower.com.
[1] Source: J.D. Power and Associates 2008 Vehicle Dependability Study(SM) and J.D. Power and Associates 2008 and 2012 Avoider Study(SM)
2012 Nameplate Ranking |
Problems per 100 Vehicles |
Lexus | 86 |
Porsche | 98 |
Cadillac | 104 |
Toyota | 104 |
Scion | 111 |
Mercedes-Benz | 112 |
Lincoln | 116 |
Ford | 124 |
Buick | 125 |
Hyundai | 125 |
Acura | 129 |
Honda | 131 |
Industry Average | 132 |
Chevrolet | 135 |
Volvo | 143 |
Audi | 148 |
smart | 148 |
Subaru | 149 |
Nissan | 152 |
Mitsubishi | 153 |
BMW | 154 |
GMC | 158 |
MINI | 161 |
Mazda | 163 |
Suzuki | 167 |
Kia | 169 |
Volkswagen | 169 |
Infiniti | 172 |
Jaguar | 172 |
Ram | 174 |
Jeep | 179 |
Dodge | 183 |
Chrysler | 192 |
Land Rover and SAAB are included in the study but not ranked
due to small or insufficient sample size. |
Top Three Models per Segment
Car Segments
Sub-Compact Car
Highest Ranked: Toyota Yaris
Scion xD
Honda Fit
Compact Car
Highest Ranked: Toyota Prius
Toyota Corolla
Hyundai Elantra
Compact Sporty Car*
Highest Ranked: Scion tC
Midsize Car
Highest Ranked: Ford Fusion
Mitsubishi Galant
Toyota Camry
Large Car
Highest Ranked: Buick Lucerne
Toyota Avalon
Ford Taurus
Entry Premium Car
Highest Ranked: Lexus ES 350 (tie), Lincoln MKZ (tie)
Acura TL
Midsize Premium Car
Highest Ranked: Hyundai Genesis
Mercedes-Benz E-Class
Volvo S80
*No other model in this segment performs above the segment average.
NOTE: For a segment award to be issued, there must be at least three models with sufficient sample that comprise 80 percent of market sales within an award segment. In the compact premium sporty car segment, midsize sporty car segment, premium sporty car segment and large premium car segment, these criteria were not met, so no awards have been presented in these segments.
Top Three Models per Segment
Truck/Multi-Purpose Vehicle/Crossover/SUV Segments
Compact Multi-Purpose Vehicle*
Highest Ranked: Scion xB
Compact Crossover/SUV
Highest Ranked: Chevrolet Equinox
Honda CR-V
Toyota RAV4
Midsize Crossover/SUV
Highest Ranked: Ford Explorer (tie), Nissan Murano (tie)
Toyota Highlander
Midsize Premium Crossover/SUV*
Highest Ranked: Lexus RX 350
Lincoln MKX
Midsize Pickup
Highest Ranked: Nissan Frontier
Ford Ranger
Honda Ridgeline
Minivan*
Highest Ranked: Toyota Sienna
Honda Odyssey
Large Pickup
Highest Ranked: Toyota Tundra
GMC Sierra HD
Chevrolet Silverado LD
*No other model in this segment performs above the segment average.
NOTE: For a segment award to be issued, there must be at least three models with sufficient sample that comprise 80 percent of market sales within an award segment. In the entry premium crossover/SUV segment, large crossover/SUV segment and large premium crossover/SUV segments, these criteria were not met, so no awards have been presented in these segments.