Back In The Hunt? Lexus Leads The Pack In JD Power And Associates Intitial Quality Study

Back In The Hunt? Lexus Leads The Pack In JD Power And Associates Intitial Quality Study
As the U.S. automotive industry continues to recover, vehicle manufacturers post the strongest improvement in initial quality since 2009 and are producing higher-quality vehicles than ever before, according to the J.D. Power and Associates 2012 U.S. Initial Quality StudySM (IQS) released today.

Overall initial quality for the industry improves by 5 problems per 100 vehicles (PP100) to average 102 PP100 in 2012--an improvement of 5 percent from 2011. There are year-over-year gains in most areas of initial quality, with one notable exception--audio, entertainment, and navigation problems have increased by 8 percent from 2011. This continues a recent trend, as problems in this category have increased by 45 percent since 2006 while other categories have improved by 24 percent, on average.



As manufacturers introduce increasingly sophisticated multimedia systems designed to enhance the ownership experience, owners more frequently cite these systems as a source of quality problems. For the first time in the 26-year history of the study, owners report more problems related to audio, entertainment, and navigation systems than in any other vehicle area. This is driven in part by a rapid increase in the fitment of new technology, such as voice recognition on mainstream models.

"Until recently, this type of sophisticated technology was found primarily on high-end models" said David Sargent, vice president of global automotive at J.D. Power and Associates. "However, over the past few years it has rapidly found its way into the automotive mainstream. For example, in 2012, more than 80 percent of owners indicate that their new vehicle has some form of hands-free technology."

Specifically, the number of owner-reported problems with factory-installed hands-free communication devices has increased 137 percent during the past four years. In fact, hands-free devices not recognizing commands has become the most-often-reported problem in the industry.

"As smartphones become ubiquitous in the lives of consumers and are ever-more sophisticated, expectations about the complementary technologies being offered in new models will only get higher," said Sargent. "Automakers and suppliers are working hard to meet those expectations with systems intended to make the driving experience safer, more convenient and more entertaining. However, the most innovative technology in the world will quickly create dissatisfaction if owners can't get it to work."

Other key findings from the study include:
Of the 34 brands ranked in the 2012 IQS, 26 have improved from 2011, five have declined, one scores the same as in 2011 and two were not included in the 2011 study.
Of the 185 models ranked in both the 2012 and 2011 IQS, 65 percent have improved.
The average quality of all-new or redesigned models improves 12 percent compared with 2011, with eleven all-new or redesigned models performing better than their segment average.
The Initial Quality Study, now in its 26th year, serves as the industry benchmark for new-vehicle quality measured at 90 days of ownership. The study is used extensively by manufacturers worldwide to help them design and build better models and by consumers to help them in their vehicle purchase decisions. Initial quality has been shown throughout the years to be an excellent initial indicator of long-term durability, which directly impacts consumer purchase decisions. The study captures problems experienced by owners in two distinct categories: design-related problems and defects and malfunctions.

2012 IQS Ranking Highlights
Lexus is the highest-ranked nameplate in the industry for a second consecutive year, averaging 73 PP100. With 75 PP100 each, Jaguar and Porsche follow Lexus in a tie to rank second. Jaguar posts the largest improvement in the study--reducing problems by 39 PP100 and vaulting from the 20th rank position in 2011. Cadillac (80 PP100) and Honda (83 PP100) round out the top five rank positions.

Among the 21 model-level segment awards, Ford and Lexus receive three each. Ford earns awards for the Expedition, Mustang and Taurus, and Lexus garners awards for the ES 350, LS and RX. Receiving two segment awards each are Infiniti (EX-Series, M-Series); Nissan (Frontier, Quest); and Toyota (Corolla, Yaris). The Porsche 911 ranks highest in the premium sporty segment and achieves 44 PP100, the lowest PP100 score since the study was redesigned in 2006.

Also receiving segment awards are the Buick Enclave; Cadillac Escalade; Chevrolet Malibu; GMC Sierra LD; Honda CR-V; Kia Soul; Mazda MX-5 Miata; and Volvo C70.

"While in past years a handful of brands tended to collect numerous segment awards, 14 different brands receive segment awards in 2012--this is only the second time in the history of the study that so many different brands achieved award status," said Sargent. "This is a positive indication of how widespread high quality is among automakers, with most brands producing a number of models with exceptional quality levels."



Plant Assembly Line Quality Awards
Honda Motor Company's Suzuka 3, Mie (Sss) plant in Japan, which produces the Honda CR-Z and Fit, receives the Platinum Plant Assembly Line Quality Award for producing models yielding the fewest defects or malfunctions. Plant awards are based solely on average levels of defects and malfunctions and exclude design-related problems.

Among plants in the North/South America region, the Toyota Motor Corporation Cambridge South, Ontario, plant, which produces the Lexus RX, receives a Gold Plant Assembly Line Quality Award.

In the Europe and Africa region, Volvo receives a Gold Plant Assembly Line Quality Award for the Uddevalla, Sweden, plant, which produces the Volvo C70 in a joint venture with Pininfarina.

The 2012 U.S. Initial Quality Study is based on responses from more than 74,000 purchasers and lessees of new 2012 model-year cars, trucks and multi-activity vehicles surveyed after 90 days of ownership. The study is based on a 228-question battery designed to provide manufacturers with information to facilitate identification of problems and drive product improvement. The study was fielded between February and May 2012.




WillisWillis - 6/22/2012 2:09:17 PM
-4 Boost
Yeah, along with your precious Scion...


LexusLexus - 6/20/2012 5:06:30 PM
+6 Boost
Congratulation Lexus and keep up the good work. If this was a recall we probably have 1,000s+ post by now but since it's an award Lexus is receiving BMWspies I mean autospies is a little quiet here. IMAO.......!


g2okg2ok - 6/20/2012 5:38:33 PM
+2 Boost
Aren't VW, Audi and Porsche the same company. They are all over the place. Looks like VW/Audi are the big losers. Also surprised MB/BMW were just above average with Toyota itself.
The ES and RX are big winners for Lexus.


Dr550Dr550 - 6/20/2012 7:31:58 PM
-1 Boost
The ES and RX are Lexus. Good Camry parts tried and tested.


USNA1999USNA1999 - 6/20/2012 7:02:07 PM
-1 Boost
This study is as useless and any from Consumer Reports. Really? Who buys cars based on these reports? I currently own cars in both sides of their spectrum; 2009 LS 460, 2008 VW Toaureg and a 2011 MINI. No complaints from any of them. All purchased new.
Looking at the list, some of the companies below the industry average are selling cars at record levels (ie. AUDI, VW, SUBARU, MINI and so on). Obviously, the report has no impact in sales.
Jaguar just below LEXUS? Please, give me a break. What a joke!


enthusiastx11enthusiastx11 - 6/20/2012 9:18:38 PM
-2 Boost
and once again this survey proves one things: all cars today are incredibly well made.

the difference between first place and dead last is 0.78 problems per car. #1 has 0.73 problems per car and dead last has 1.51 problems per car.

initial quality is now a moot point of comparison between cars.


enthusiastx11enthusiastx11 - 6/20/2012 9:21:12 PM
-2 Boost
and it's even more ludicrous when you compare difference amount the top ten. lexus has 0.73 problems per car and mercedes, for example, has 0.96. OH MY GOD, 0.23 more problems per car. CALL OUT THE NATIONAL GUARD. lol


enthusiastx11enthusiastx11 - 6/21/2012 1:52:24 PM
-3 Boost
pondo: i really don't care who announces what. and anyone who announces silly things like this is desperate for a story. i'm more interested in FACTS. these numbers are laughable. 20 years ago the differences were huge, today they're silly.


lexworldlexworld - 6/21/2012 11:10:50 AM
+3 Boost
...There is a pattern I see here. I think Toyota really understands profitability. Them keeping their Lexus Brand at the top reveals Number One, they are the Superior Automaker and Number Two, It actually saves million of dollars to keep the Toyota Brand close to it's nearest Competitors but above all others while they bring all those new products to the Market Place. Trust me, they aint puttin all their eggs in one basket. They know that spending Millions just to Have both the Toyota & Lexus Names @ the top (quality wise) will not change their position to out sell their Competitors, at the same time why use the extra effort/expense when introducing new products. They will continue to work on quality issues as they go. Remember, a new product is tested before, during, after it's released. Over all the Toyota Brand is actually the best, knowing they are the one's who are the makers of the Lexus Brand....They are the Mothership!!!



WillisWillis - 6/22/2012 2:08:40 PM
-2 Boost
Get off the KoolAid. Seriously.

As enthusiast said, all cars today are well made and very reliable.


lexworldlexworld - 6/21/2012 11:14:17 AM
+4 Boost
....Dont hate, Congratulate!!



VISOVISO - 6/22/2012 6:21:36 PM
-1 Boost
Is the differences between the top and say the industry average ACTUALLY statistically significant? Does not seem to be from a mathematical and statistical perspective, so then one can assume the the percentage of error inherent in any study would actually show no discernable difference of the outcomes here. So if one make has a score 73 vs.105, it means nothing as the study bares no statistical significant outcome. And reading the fine print from JD Powers states the following: "Ranking is based on numerical scores and not necessarily statistical signifance." So the results are meaningless other than a marketing tool. Definitely, would not base any purchase on this study. It has zero outcome difference. Very poor way to conduct a study.


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC