BMW Turbo Technology Revived

For more than two decades, BMW has been rolling off naturally aspirated vehicles as if it did not know the existence of a turbocharger. But BMW’s 2002 Turbo put the automaker in the spotlight back in 1973.
Read Article

BM3WBM3W - 7/27/2006 1:52:51 PM
+1 Boost
BMW insured that this twin-turbo six cylinder engine slated for the 335 coupe will perform as potently as a V8 while maintaining the V6’s fuel advantage!!!


PlanoA4PlanoA4 - 7/27/2006 2:22:40 PM
+2 Boost
BMW3W - Wow that sounds like the Audi 2.0T a four cylinder that acts like a six! It is about time BMW woke up and smelled the coffee.

Barrista! Pass them a double shot please! They have been asleep too long.


chewychewy - 7/27/2006 3:35:06 PM
+1 Boost
PlanoA4

It looks like it, it also uses the exact same technology that Audi has had for couple of years already.


PlanoA4PlanoA4 - 7/27/2006 4:33:04 PM
+2 Boost
No Chewy, They have "Discovered" new technology through extensive R&D. More like the finally walked into the Audi Showroom and said "Vat dis dees Tuuurbo thingie", and grabbed a brochure.


BMWRocksBMWRocks - 7/27/2006 4:43:57 PM
+1 Boost
BMW had turbo before Audi came online. hahaha. :(


BM3WBM3W - 7/27/2006 4:52:35 PM
-1 Boost
chewy and Plano A4......BMW is not using the same turbo technology has Audi. Unlike Audi, BMW will be using their twin turbos at their highest potential. ZERO turbo lag is the key here guys. Something Audi could never achieve. The lag on Audi's turbo engines is unbearable. I know because one of my friends owns the Audi S4. Audi makes good engines but BMW makes great engines. Why do think BMW continues to rake in "engine of the year awards" year after year. I'll make my prediction right here right now. BMW's all new I6 twin turbo will yet again win the "engine of the year award" next year!!!!


BMW4me4everBMW4me4ever - 7/27/2006 5:09:24 PM
0 Boost
I agree with BM3w ... The Turbo Lag on an Audi is borderline ridiculous ... My brother is a mechanic for Audi, and last year for my b-day he took an Audi A6 2.7T as a demo. We raced stop light to stop light in a 2005 loaner 530i ( with the 225 hp version ) and I killed him due to the lag. Only when we did a roll on was it even close .. The BMW will win engine of the year again for it seems like the 8 consecutive year now ... Just like the vanos technology in the 7-series and the 3-series deal... The 3.2l I6 of the M3 ... When was the last time Audi won engine of the year award? Not the interior of the year, cause we all know that is the sole reason that the pro-audi people say that Audi will end up selling more cars in the US than BMW .... BMW is the Ultimate Driving Machine ...


RupertRupert - 7/27/2006 5:52:24 PM
+1 Boost
"I know because one of my friends owns the Audi S4. "
umm.....doesn't the s4 have a naturally aspirated 4.2? so there isn't any turbo lag possible as there is no turbo?


BM3WBM3W - 7/27/2006 6:10:19 PM
+1 Boost
Rupert....

NO the Audi S4 does'nt have a NA 4.2 Liter. Here are the specs for a 2002 Audi S4 . And yes this ride comes with plenty of turbo lag!!

-Turbo compressor
-2,671 cc 2.7 liters 6 V front engine with 81 mm bore, 86.4 mm stroke, 9.3 compression ratio, double overhead cam, variable valve timing/camshaft and five valves per cylinder
-Premium unleaded fuel
-Fuel economy EPA highway (l/100km): 10.2
-Multi-point injection fuel system
-Main 62 liter premium unleaded fuel tank
-Power: SAE and 186 kW , 250 HP @ 5,800 rpm; 258 ft lb , 350 Nm @ 1,850 rpm



RupertRupert - 7/27/2006 8:25:57 PM
+1 Boost
sorry, i didn't know that version of the s4 had that engine. i thought only the 02-05 model had an s4 (which came out in 03), and that is a 4.2.


chewychewy - 7/27/2006 9:08:43 PM
+1 Boost
Good job comparing a 2002 engine with a 2007 engine. That engine didn't have FSI. Hell, why not compare a 1937 engine with the one from today, I know which one is better. Also as I said in the other thread, the BMW 3.0 liter 300 hp will probably have less turbo lag than Audis 2.0 liter 200 hp engine (it doesn't have much) because it is 50 % larger and has 50 % more horsepower.


BMW530iBMW530i - 7/28/2006 8:43:48 PM
+1 Boost
Claims that Audi "will never achieve turbo-lag free" engines are a bit ridiculous and unfair, don't you think?

I was lucky enough to be driven in a Mercedes S600 (the turbo or twinturbocharged V12 with 590 lb/ft of torque) in Europe and the fellow who owned the car hammered it on a few occassions, to impress me I thought. Well impressed I was. I didn't notice any turbo lag. Granted, I wasn't driving, but the moment he stomped the pedal, the car took off with such brutality, I was slammed deep into the leather seats. It was a fantastic experience.

Anyway, if MB can do this, you bet Audi can too. ;)


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC