Motor Trend: 2013 Audi S8 Goes 0-60 MPH in Just 3.5 Seconds!

Motor Trend: 2013 Audi S8 Goes 0-60 MPH in Just 3.5 Seconds!
How fast is your new whatever? Doesn't matter -- this full-size, four-door Audi is faster. That's right, kids, unless you're driving one of the absolute quickest cars on the market, the 2013 Audi S8 luxury sedan will probably show you its taillights. Let's look at the numbers. This all-wheel drive luxo-cruiser weighs a stout 4619 pounds and packs a 520-horsepower, 4.0-liter twin-turbo V-8 with 481 lb-ft of torque. Hah! Your Chevord Mustaro GZ-51 makes more power than that! Well, you'd better get that launch right, or you'll be explaining to your passengers why you just lost to a sedan. See, this new Audi S8 hits 60 mph in 3.5 seconds and runs the quarter mile in 11.8 seconds at 118.3 mph. Your Camaro ZL1 doesn't have a chance, and your Shelby GT500 better hook up or it's done, too. Of course, S8 buyers don't usually cross-shop Mustangs and Camaros, but it's still worth noting that you'd have to pay nearly the same coin for a Nissan GT-R or a Corvette ZR-1 that will actually beat the $110,000 Audi.

Forget the sports cars, then. Let's talk real-world competitors. Mercedes-Benz S63 AMG? The last one we tested (a 2012 model) needed 4.3 seconds to get to 60 mph and 12.6 seconds to run the quarter. There's a new one coming, but it's at least a year out. How about that new Alpina B7, since BMW doesn't do an M7? BMW claims a 0-to-60 mph time of 4.5 seconds. We'll verify that soon enough, but it makes no difference here. The S8 also bests the smaller, lighter M5, which needs 3.7 seconds to hit 60 mph and 11.9 seconds to finish the quarter mile. The newest Maserati Quattroporte we tested, a 2008 Sport GT, matches up on price but not performance. It needed 5.4 seconds to hit 60 mph and 13.9 seconds to do the quarter. What about the Jaguar XJ Supersport? 4.7 seconds to 60 mph claimed. Lexus LS 460 F Sport? Slightly faster than the Maserati, Lexus says. Infiniti M56? Into the fours, but still way behind the Audi. For nearly double the price, you could get a Bentley Continental Flying Spur Speed, but you'd be more than a second slower to 60 mph. If you're willing to triple the price tag and forgo two doors, Ferrari says the new FF will hit 60 mph in 3.7 seconds and it's probably slightly quicker than that, but Ferrari won't give us one to test.


Read Article

GermanNutGermanNut - 10/22/2012 3:24:07 PM
-2 Boost
The best quote:

"The 2013 Audi S8 is one of the most capable sedans we've driven, and it does so at a price that shames some of its closest competitors. Audi has been firing volleys directly at sport luxury competition for years now, and with the new S8, it's scored a direct hit."

This review sounds just like the comparison test where the 2013 Audi S6 defeated the 2013 BMW M5 and Mercedes-Benz E63 AMG. Once again the Audi is as capable or more capable than its closest rivals but costs thousands (in some cases tens of thousands) of dollars less.



The 2013 Audi S6 Goes 0-60 mph in just 3.7 seconds.




MercedesSLMercedesSL - 10/22/2012 3:27:50 PM
+3 Boost
Same old Audi story quick in a straight line but little else. They maybe the stoplight racers car of choice, but are far less at home on a track, and not the enthusiast choice. Case in point, see the video of how bad the RS3 understeers compared to the more balanced M135i.

"The story differs only slightly when you turn the steering wheel. The Panamera Turbo S and M5, being nearly full-fledged sports cars, pull higher average g numbers on the skidpad and run quicker figure-eight times"


"If there's once place where the big Audi falters ever so slightly, it's in the steering. Audi power steering has refined seemingly with every new model in the past few years, but it's still not quite there."



MercedesSLMercedesSL - 10/22/2012 3:55:00 PM
+3 Boost
"Who the hell would track a $100k luxury flagship sedan??! "

The same people who would care about doing a 3.5 second launch controlled start in a 100K luxury flagship....no one, thats why this car is so pointless.


chewychewy - 10/22/2012 9:54:49 PM
-2 Boost
No launch control on the S8, pure traction and power.


911gt2911gt2 - 10/22/2012 10:25:38 PM
+3 Boost
I have read some reviews on the S8, while it is quick due to an obviously underrated engine, they all conclude its a dull instrument...there are more to cars than quick 0 to 60 times...The panamera is a better overall package than this.


ThierryHenry14ThierryHenry14 - 10/24/2012 3:13:55 PM
0 Boost
Not quite sure why everyone is bashing this car... the first sentence kinds of says it all... to all the haters...

And yes, I am almost certain all the bashers also will not be in the market for this car either because they cannot afford it or... yea, they cannot afford it. So Audi does not care that you think its pointless, because your opinion, to Audi, is meaningless...


94geo94geo - 10/22/2012 3:41:06 PM
+9 Boost
Too bad that 0-60 time doesn’t make it any better looking.


LexusLexus - 10/22/2012 3:47:52 PM
+2 Boost
That's really impressive number but I agree with MercedesSL here that Audi need to make it cars faster and more fun to drive on the track as well. If Audi cars is Only fast at the stoplight than it's nothing than a German version of the American muscle cars like the Mustang, Camaro, Doge Challenge and Corvette etc....!

But American muscle cars is getting better at the race track as well. So it's more refine now and fun to as well on the track.


chewychewy - 10/22/2012 4:02:51 PM
-1 Boost
The S8 is probably as good on the track as any 202 inch sedan (or any German or British competitor) can possibly be in stock form. It's competing with the S63/65 and Alpina B7 not the M5/Panamera. There are people that do take the A8/S8 onto the track but it's probably to see what it can do and not go full out, probably the same case with the BMW/MB equivalent.


Car4LifeCar4Life - 10/24/2012 12:23:40 PM
+1 Boost
Enjoy it while you can Audi, The 8 year old S Class rival you "feel" you've finally dethroned takes the throne right back next year with an all new model.


cidflekkencidflekken - 10/22/2012 4:45:08 PM
+2 Boost
Interesting trend that seems to be occurring. The focus used to be on all -around driving dynamics and hard-ass acceleration. BMW M seemed to dominated driving dynamics and today still pulls some of highest track results. Mercedes AMG seemed to have dominated the drag-racing all through the speedometer and still does. Now, Audi introduces basically a new category of dominance with the S-lines: short-length acceleration. It pummels at 0-60 and 1/4 mile (mainly due to quattro), but falls short almost everywhere else. So, at the end of the day it's going to depend on what your driving preference is.


chewychewy - 10/22/2012 5:16:01 PM
-3 Boost
Show any evidence where the S8 falls to S63/S65 or BMW equivalent in handling or other dynamics. It's actually lighter than those competitors. The thing traps 118, unless you have multiple miles of airport nothing in its segment is going to be ahead. The next S63 might do better in due time but once again it's traction limited unless it goes AWD as well.

If you look at the MT test the S8 actually has a better figure 8 time than the M5 (although just a tenth to be fair) The M5 is 10 inches shorter yet can't go around a tight track any better. This shows the bigger S8 isn't much worse if any on a track than the class size lower M5.


mclaren428mclaren428 - 10/22/2012 10:59:33 PM
+3 Boost
How would figure 8 performance translate to how fast a car could lap a track? Unless the track was 200ft long with two hairpins. accelerating from a dead stop is one thing, but when you are on a fast back road or a race track your in motion, there are no 0 to 60 runs...its all in gear acceleration, and lateral grip, which is wear the M5 would whip the S8. The M5 still manages the same trap speed (and have seen the M5 trap up to 122mph) with only Rwd from a stop!!!


chewychewy - 10/23/2012 1:39:33 AM
-3 Boost
The figure 8 looks like a blend of two skidpads, certainly not a real track but it provides you with information on what the car in question can do when driven flat out.

Would the M5 post a better time on a track than the S8, I would expect that it would as the two aren't the same size nor weight nor purpose as the M5 should be more hardcore. It doesn't have the S8's interior either. But subtract half a foot of length, 200-300 pounds of weight and add horsepower and you get the idea of what the RS7 will be able to accomplish.

The US spec M5 only posted a 114 1/4 in the same mag and it looks like US versions are clearly under 120 even if the 114 is on the low end. Kind of a weird coincedence of how the heavier and supposedly less powerful S8 outnumbered the M5 in this case. Your punt returner just got chased down by the linebacker and it wasn't pretty.

As an uber sedan the S8 has a couple of rivals and it will more than hold its own against them.


mclaren428mclaren428 - 10/23/2012 8:24:43 AM
+3 Boost
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/sedans/1203_2013_bmw_m5_test/specs.html

And here is a test MT did of the M5 a few months earlier WITH DCT where it trapped over 120mph! And did the Figure 8 in 24.9 sec @ 0.81 g (avg). So the M5 is clearly faster.

The 114 you refer to is with a 6 speed manual.


chewychewy - 10/23/2012 12:04:58 PM
-3 Boost
NO, the M5 tested was NOT a manual. It was just a slow US spec which BMW claimed wasn't broken in. Which is reasonable but the difference was bigger than what you usually see in different tests.


mclaren428mclaren428 - 10/23/2012 12:26:06 PM
+2 Boost
Just like there will be slower times for the S8, but the numbers I posted above are what the M5 achieved when MT first tested it just like what is posted above is what they acieved when they first tested the S8...who knows maybe the when they test the S8 in a few months it will be slower also.

Regardles the 120mph in the 1/4, And the Figure 8 in 24.9 sec @ 0.81 g (avg) Are quicker than the S8..and the S8's wheelbase is only and inch longer. Im sure the RS6 will be quicker than the M5 in a straight line thanks to awd, but that has always been the case, and around the track the M5 will be the prefered choice over the awd rs...


chewychewy - 10/23/2012 1:38:08 PM
-3 Boost
It could go slower or quicker, usually it's 1-2 mph in the quarter and not 6 but whatever. The S8 is still 9 inches longer and 200+ pounds heavier. Not bad for 202 inches.

We shall see what the RS7 and RS6 will do, based on what the S6 and S8 are able to do it shouldn't be bad at all.

Do you know any race car drivers that prefer something slower around a track to something quicker?


mclaren428mclaren428 - 10/23/2012 2:50:01 PM
+3 Boost
"Do you know any race car drivers that prefer something slower around a track to something quicker? "

Race car drivers do not buy these car. But no, thats why the RS6/7 will be a hard sell since it will not be as home on a track as the M5. But considering the RS will be two years newer than the M5, and Audi will have been able to see what BMW does, you would home its faster right? BMW will be offering a performance back on the M5 around the RS6 launch like they did wiith the M3 when the RS5 came out to ensure the M has the edge.


mclaren428mclaren428 - 10/23/2012 2:57:18 PM
+2 Boost
Did you see the recent video where the M135i beat the RS3? The M135i should compete with the S3 but beat the more focused RS3 b/c it was much better to drive.


chewychewy - 10/23/2012 4:01:48 PM
-2 Boost
So the RS6/RS7 will be a tough sell because it possibly won't be as at home on the track, even if no one actually buys these based on how it would do on the track nor has the driving skill to extract 10/10 performance of either one. Yet Motor Trend found the S8 to be perfectly balanced driver on the road. And their comments about steering feel were along the same lines for both. And once again this is in reference to a size bigger S8. Don't think many RS7 buyers will be dissapointed.

You are already giving the M5 the excuse of being older yet are perfectly fine comparing the last generation RS3.


mclaren428mclaren428 - 10/23/2012 5:00:04 PM
+3 Boost
“It could go slower or quicker, usually it's 1-2 mph in the quarter and not 6 but whatever. The S8 is still 9 inches longer and 200+ pounds heavier. Not bad for 202 inches”

Yeah it’s not bad for Awd, but the fact the M5 has trapped up to 122mph and can do it out of the hole with only RWD shows it’s a much quicker car than the S8, especially if it was around a track. I only state this B/c in your first post you started comparing the S8 to the M5…But check the link I posted above and it proves this is simply not true.

I’m sure the S8 drives great on the road but so does a 750i, and S63, but on the track it’s the same old from Audi…massive understeer…and the same will most likely apply the the RS, but it will be fast in a straight line so who cares right?

"While the big Audi would plow like a Deere when pushed too hard on the skidpad"-MT

M6 gran coupe has yet to be released, I’m sure it will be right on par with the RS7.



chewychewy - 10/23/2012 6:56:14 PM
-1 Boost
Convenient how you left out the oversteer on the figure 8 because you know every track is just purely a skidpad. As they said unless you are pushing 10/10 there are no faults with its handling.

I think the S8 will easily spank the 750li on the track since that's so important to you.

The only reason I brought up the M5 was because they showed up on the MT website on the same day and they mentioned the M5 in the S8 article that I read first.

"The S8 also bests the smaller, lighter M5, which needs 3.7 seconds to hit 60 mph and 11.9 seconds to finish the quarter mile."

You are correct the M5 makes up a tenth from 60 to 120 on the S8 and will probably pull ahead slightly at higher speeds but I wouldn't be surprised if extra traction didn't prove useful putting the power down out of corners. It's not like MT didn't say those exact words.

The M6 GC vs. RS7 vs. CLS63 should be a good battle, as far as I remember the V6 A7 took the first rounds vs. the 635i GC.


Yonder7Yonder7 - 10/22/2012 5:59:03 PM
+2 Boost
chewy: BMW Fans are hurt M5 inferior to S8 ...wow...show me those numbers ...Foreseen..M5 will be losing buyers a lot quicker this time..


HolydudeHolydude - 10/23/2012 5:44:51 AM
+1 Boost
Sorry, I just don't see or believe how the S8 can put up those numbers with those specifications...


JustaCarJustaCar - 10/23/2012 7:08:34 AM
-2 Boost
Why is the S8 being compared to an M5? Why not compare it to the 7-series equivalent?



chewychewy - 10/23/2012 12:23:41 PM
+1 Boost
There isn't one. Even the semi official B7 Alpina is not on the same plane. The updated version should be more competitive.


Yonder7Yonder7 - 10/23/2012 8:12:10 AM
0 Boost
Cause it kick the butt of both cars... 7 or M5..


Yonder7Yonder7 - 10/23/2012 1:33:46 PM
+2 Boost
Still give me the M5, Audi Nice..very Nice done but still, the front of S8 is even uglier than the one on the M5...


lexworldlexworld - 10/23/2012 7:33:24 PM
+2 Boost
...Say what you may, this thing is the new King of the Hill in 4 door sedan straight line performance!


lexworldlexworld - 10/23/2012 7:37:13 PM
+2 Boost
...And BMW will not be losing any buyers any time soon because of Audi's horrible trouble index. An Audi over an IS-F or Lexus anything is not likely among most non-enthusiast buyers. You can take that to the Bank folks! Or should I say Lexus will take that to the Bank!


ThierryHenry14ThierryHenry14 - 10/24/2012 3:43:14 PM
0 Boost
Its amazing how many haters out there... Remember, this car is a Luxury, full size saloon, not intended to go against the M5. So for all the haters and BMW fanboys who are so upset and having to prove that the M5 is better is actually proving Audi's point, that this car, although a sports version of a larger class car which is not meant to compete with the sportier M5 but can keep up with it is exceptional...

Most people here are missing the point. The point is not that the S8 is a competitor to the M5, the point is that for such a big car, its performance figures are comparable to the sportier, lighter, more powerful M5...


chewychewy - 10/24/2012 4:22:47 PM
-1 Boost
Exactomundo!


mclaren428mclaren428 - 10/24/2012 10:05:06 PM
+1 Boost
"performance figures are comparable to the sportier, lighter, more powerful M5"

Lol, MT dynoed the S8 and it puts down 575hp at the crank, coupled with Awd you would expect some quick numbers..... Chewy compared it to the M5, yes the S8 is quick in a straight line, but the M5 is still in another league dynamically. There are more to cars than the drag strip, but Audi fansboys don't understand that.

" I wouldn't be surprised if extra traction didn't prove useful putting the power down out of corners."...yeah on the street, but people do not race these or even approach half their limits on the street, so it is irrelevant. The only place both of these cars limits could approached is the track, and at the track the M5 would be far quicker machine....and Mt did say at the track it plows/understeers, and it has Audi's typical numb steering. Yes the S8 is a fast and comfortable street car and that's it, its not M5 competitor.



chewychewy - 10/25/2012 1:16:32 AM
+1 Boost
Where is the article with S8 dyno results, I must have missed it.

MT said that it understeered on the skidpad, you know the 200 feet tight circle. It oversteered a bit on the figure 8. Even on the track it would do more than well enough for someone taking a 202 inch 120,000 car onto the track.

I am not saying that the S8 would necessaraly beat the M5 on a track, but it might be much closer than it should for what the two cars are.


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC