Study Indicates Owners Becoming Frustrated With Lack Of Voice Control And Complexity In NAV Systems

Study Indicates Owners Becoming Frustrated With Lack Of Voice Control And Complexity In NAV Systems
 Despite many new-vehicle owners saying their  factory-installed navigation system is better than their previous system, navigation system satisfaction has declined from 2011, as owners are frustrated by the complexity of menu systems, voice control commands and inputting destinations, according to the J.D. Power and Associates 2012 U.S. Navigation Usage and Satisfaction StudySM released today.

Now in its 14th year, the study identifies six factors that contribute to overall satisfaction with factory-installed navigation systems. In order of importance, they are ease of use; routing; navigation display screen; speed of system; voice directions; and voice activation. The study also measures quality by examining problems per 100 (PP100) vehicles, in which a lower score reflects higher quality.

On average, satisfaction with navigation systems is 681 (on a 1,000-point scale), a 13-point decrease from 694 in 2011. Satisfaction declines in all factors, most notably in ease of use (637), which declines by 25 points year over year.  

As smartphones become more sophisticated in the functions they can perform, more owners are using them for navigation. In the 2012 study, 47 percent of vehicle owners indicate they use a downloaded app on their smartphone for navigation in their vehicle, compared with 37 percent in 2011. Notably, 46 percent of owners indicate they "definitely would not" or "probably would not" repurchase a factory-installed navigation system if their smartphone navigation could be displayed on a central screen in their vehicle.

"Manufacturers of navigation systems face a serious challenge as smartphone navigation usage continues to rise and gains preference among vehicle owners," said Mike VanNieuwkuyk , executive director of global automotive at J.D. Power and Associates. "Free apps, up-to-date maps and a familiar interface allow for quicker routing and improved interaction, including better voice recognition. Manufacturers have a window of opportunity to either improve upon the current navigation system platforms or focus on new ways to integrate smartphones."

The study finds that input and selection controls account for six of the top 10 most frequent problems owners experience with their factory-installed navigation system. The remaining four problems are the inability to read the text due to size or location; the map not showing enough street names; the system was slow to boot/connect; and the screen lighting not working properly.

"As more than one-half of the top problems relate directly to inputting information and interacting with the navigation system, there is a clear need for manufacturers to improve upon the interaction between the user and the navigation system," said VanNieuwkuyk.

Another key study finding is the level of interest in voice activation, as 67 percent of owners without voice activation in their vehicle indicate they would want it in their next navigation system, and 80 percent of those with voice activation say they would want it again in their next system. While this is a highly sought-after feature, voice activation satisfaction is 544, the lowest factor score in the study—93 points below the factor with the second lowest score, ease of use. In addition, difficulty using voice activation controls is the third-most-frequently reported problem in the study at 27.8 PP100.

"Smartphones and natural voice recognition have raised owner expectations among all vehicle segments, and manufacturers are not yet meeting these demands," said VanNieuwkuyk.

Satisfaction with the basic functions of factory-installed navigation systems, such as map routing, declines less than all those measured in the study, indicating they are performing as owners expect them to. However, satisfaction with the ease of using the system—such as connectivity with smartphones, user interface and integration with other media devices in the vehicle—declines more than the other functions measured.

"We're seeing a demand from owners for connectivity with not only other in-vehicle systems, but also their own equipment and smartphone. Navigation systems are no longer viewed as a stand-alone component, but as part of a media, safety and infotainment package, and are expected to seamlessly work together, but in many cases are falling short of owner expectations."

Among vehicle models with a factory-installed navigation system that perform particularly well are the Garmin-supplied Chrysler 300 Series and Dodge Charger and the Harman-supplied Porsche Cayenne. The Garmin systems in both the Chrysler 300 Series and the Dodge Charger perform well in all factors, particularly in ease of use. The Harman system in the Porsche Cayenne also performs well in all factors, particularly voice activation.

The 2012 U.S. Navigation Usage and Satisfaction Study is based on responses from 20,704 owners who recently purchased or leased a new 2012 model-year vehicle with a factory-installed navigation system. The study was fielded in October and November 2012.



atc98092atc98092 - 1/11/2013 1:18:59 PM
+2 Boost
The main issue I have with phone based nav is that the screen is far too small. Also, I have used my car nav to simply look at the street layout around me to see if another street might offer a better path, without actually using the nav portion.


AlleVierAlleVier - 1/11/2013 2:02:55 PM
0 Boost
Screens for navigation should be on their way out. If voice instructions and location detection get really good, a screen will be minimally helpful. And, by good, I mean the nav unit knows what lane you're in with almost no latency and has traffic awareness and the voice instructions are more detailed and naturalistic ("go ahead and get in the right lane after you pass this red car on the right, you'll be getting off at the next exit"). As it is, I barely look at the screen with the unsophisticated and repetitive "get ready to turn" instructions of current phone navigation apps. But for those moments where visual information is helpful, I'd hope the augmented-reality windshield will be the answer.


Agent009Agent009 - 1/11/2013 3:16:07 PM
+1 Boost
The automakers are not a fast on the feet as the phone makers.
By the time they lock in to a design and produce it, it is out of date.

Just make an industry standard and have the phone do the leg work via a series of apps on the display.


SteveSteve - 1/11/2013 5:00:31 PM
+2 Boost
Factory nav systems are rubbish, and way over-priced. For an example of how the best-in-class people do it, turn to Garmin. They have industry-leading functionality, great user interface, the best graphics, and ease of use, with the flagship model running about $400.

I have Garmin's 3790LMT, and I love it. I got it for $349 when it first came out. I never use the voice control gimmick. but it's nice for impressing passengers when you demo the unit. $3000 factory nav systems look and feel like cheap, antiquated imitations by comparison :-(


PLAYPLAY - 1/11/2013 10:20:02 PM
+2 Boost
All this technological crap. I don't use anything besides AC and radio. Seriously, I get in my car and drive someplace. I can't imagine being distracted and fidgeting around with technology. Who needs it!


trmckintrmckin - 1/13/2013 11:52:33 AM
+2 Boost
I use the weather app frequently in my wife's car. Especially when driving between Denver and the ski resorts. Comes in handy with very little distraction. All the rest of it is just fluff and a waste of time. Passengers find it fun to fool with and irritate me while driving but otherwise, it's just something that will be outdated sooner rather than later. Next purchase will be without nav screen. Money is better spent on a sunroof or other option. I'm already paying for data and Nav on my phone. A manufacturer should come up with a way to link those handy new cluster screens with your phone via usb connection. Would be much more useful and would be upgraded every time you upgrade your phone.


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC