DEBATE: What Is The MOST OVERPRICED Car Under $80,000?

Just the other day I had the opportunity to write down my thoughts on the most disappointing cars of 2012. I don't mean to be a downer but sometimes the truth just needs to be said, folks.

And we're looking for more of the truth. This time around, to be more specific, we want to know what cars YOU think are the most overpriced under $80,000.

Is it something like the Toyota Prius C, which benefits from Toyota's amazing hybrid tech but feels more like a $10,000 Hyundai from 1999?

Or how about the Cadillac Escalade, which is really a warmed over Chevrolet/GMC?

While those are merely two examples of products I've had experiences with, we really want to know which cars YOU think aren't worth those extra bills.

So, what is the MOST OVERPRICED car under $80,000 dollars?

Sciros - 1/30/2013 12:15:01 AM

+6 Boost

Well, the new Infiniti G Convertible IPL is over $60,000 for reasons entirely unclear to me. The non-IPL version isn't exactly a great car, being already overpriced at over $50k for a more "refined" Nissan Z, and the IPL trim costs $10k more for identical performance. So I'll submit it as a contender here.

M35MT - 1/30/2013 12:26:00 PM

0 Boost

You have a point with the IPL, where you go wrong is saying that the G37 is not a great car, because it is, also, it's at the end of its life cycle and will be replaced this summer.

Sciros - 1/30/2013 12:18:03 AM

-1 Boost

(Sorry about double-posting.) The 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT8 has an msrp in the high $60000s (with any options), and even though it might be very performant it's a Jeep and paying close to $70k for a Jeep is kind of embarrassing. The Escalade is at least branded as a Cadillac.

M35MT - 1/30/2013 12:29:19 PM

+3 Boost

Disagree. The Jeep brand has actual heritage, something to be proud of if you're an American - the Wrangler is true to form and the Grand Cherokee was one of the first luxury SUV's on the market (Grand Wagoneer at the time).

While there is nothing wrong with it's interior, further refinement and higher quality materials would only add $10k more to the price, so those who want a true 4X4 with a nice interior and performance should look no further.

The above comments coming from a satisfied Range Rover Sport owner who has plenty of respect for Jeep, as long as weren't not talking about the Liberty, Compass or Patriot - those are "Feeps".

sizquik - 1/30/2013 10:36:25 AM

+1 Boost

^^^^^^^^^^^^ has never driven an M3 ^^^^^^^^^^^^
If anything the V8 will go up in value once it changes back to a 6 and gets softer once again.

enthusiastx11 - 1/31/2013 4:10:12 PM

+2 Boost

that's funny. logically speaking, the M3 is UNDERPRICED. you'd need to spend nearly double to get a car that outperforms it.

do tell us oh great one...what OUTPERFORMS the M3 for $70,000?

trmckin - 1/30/2013 1:42:10 AM

+10 Boost

I'll nominate the Smart fortwo Convertible. Starting at $17,800, being a highway deathtrap, and 38 mpg... I don't see why anyone would spend that when you could get a Chevy Cruze, Dodge Dart, Fiat 500, Ford Fiesta, Ford Focus, Elantra, Forte, Mazda 3, etc... the list goes on.. All have a lower starting price, more interior space, and better MPG.

M35MT - 1/30/2013 12:31:12 PM

+4 Boost

Agreed. I dont understand the point of the Smart car other than if you want to look different and take up half a parking spot. No cargo space, no safety and it doesn't give impressive fuel mileage given the size of the car.

dt32886 - 1/30/2013 1:47:19 AM

+9 Boost

Porsche Boxster, Cayman, and 911.
Incredible cars, but waaaay overpriced!

Also:

VW Toaureg
MB GL550
Lexus LX570 and Toyota Landcruiser
BMW Z4
Base model Tahoe/Yukon

M35MT - 1/30/2013 12:32:11 PM

+2 Boost

+ 1 on the Toureg

Terry989 - 1/30/2013 1:52:49 PM

+1 Boost

For the new Porsche Boxster S, it all depends on what you want in the car. If you want a lot of amenities, luxuries and conveniences, the options will quickly drive the car into the over priced territory. If you want it for the performance, handling and fun to drive factor, it is still reasonably priced. How many $60K convertibles run the ring in in less than 7:58? (Ferrari F430 F1 - 7:55)

dt32886 - 1/30/2013 1:48:55 AM

-1 Boost

Agent 00R,

Leave the Escalade alone!

cidflekken - 1/30/2013 2:30:29 AM

+3 Boost

Audi S5/S4
BMW 335i/335is/Convertible
Mercedes C350
Cadillac Escalade/Chevy Tahoe LTZ/GMC Denali
Range Rover Evoque Prestige
Porsche Boxster S/Cayman S

enthusiastx11 - 1/31/2013 4:11:45 PM

+1 Boost

almost all of those are leaders in their class and sell serious volume. so if they are overpriced why are they outselling less expensive competitors?

PUGPROUD - 1/30/2013 7:09:13 AM

+3 Boost

I own one...I love it...but its overpriced...a JCW Mini Roadster !

TauronB2G - 1/30/2013 7:14:13 AM

+3 Boost

All BMWs especially the 3 series, Porsches and Benzes. It's only going to get worse as manufacturers continue to release 4 cylinder luxury cars with 40k price tags. I can't see myself spending 40 k on a 4 cylinder anything.
T

jprescott - 1/30/2013 7:35:03 AM

+6 Boost

I agree with the $70,000 Jeep

M35MT - 1/30/2013 12:33:23 PM

+1 Boost

Once you start adding options that should come standard given the price it begins at, yes...

enthusiastx11 - 1/31/2013 4:12:23 PM

+1 Boost

the best costs. lol

Sciros - 1/30/2013 1:54:47 PM

+1 Boost

@M35MT
1) the Infiniti G coupe is a nice car, but not for over $50k. Let alone $60k
2) Jeep has heritage but that heritage is not ~$70k for a Grand Cherokee. The SRT is very fast in a straight line but once you're asking for that kind of money you are competing with vehicles that you don't have to provide excuses for. And "but it's really fast" is what you have to say every time someone looks at you bug-eyed when you tell them what your monthly payment for your Jeep happens to be. Indeed, you drive a Ranger Rover Sport. I wonder why you chose it over a Grand Cherokee SRT :-P

LSIII - 1/30/2013 8:19:49 PM

+3 Boost

Escalade

85bmw745i - 1/31/2013 10:36:06 AM

+2 Boost

I agree 100% Its just a Tahoe/Suburban/Yukon with a different grill and instrument cluster. It has the same cheap plastic interior and thin cheap leather that will crack after 2 years. You can get a Tahoe/Suburban with the same options for half the price. If it were its own unique vehicle and wasn't a rebadged tahoe/suburban/yukon. Fail but us Americans are stupid enough to fall for it.

hensta - 1/30/2013 10:35:36 PM

0 Boost

Audi (all of them)

MorePower - 1/31/2013 5:27:21 AM

+1 Boost

VW GTi
VW CC
Nissan Maxima
Range Rover Evoque

SlenderSpy16 - 1/31/2013 12:53:38 PM

+2 Boost

The Escalade. That kind of money should buy build quality, at least.

enthusiastx11 - 1/31/2013 4:08:09 PM

+1 Boost

opinions are all well and good. but 'overpriced' implies that people simply won't pay what a manufacturers is asking. so just look at the sales bombs and there's your answer.

david999 - 2/1/2013 11:26:49 AM

+1 Boost

Escalade
Audi A5
VW Toureg

Eyecarehawaii - 2/4/2013 2:56:43 PM

+1 Boost

The vast majority of cars on the road today fall into the "under $80k" segment. Whether a specific car is "overprced" depends greatly the value one places on it. This is such an open ended question that it lacks value. Opinions are like..

kingsley - 2/5/2013 1:40:56 AM

+1 Boost

By far the Range Rover Evoque, with its uuuuugly bashed in roof and lamentable lack of real 'Range Rover' luxury inside.