Lexus Steps Ahead Of The Competition In JD Power 2013 Vehicle Dependability Study

Lexus Steps Ahead Of The Competition In JD Power 2013 Vehicle Dependability Study
The long-term dependability of three-year-old models has improved year-over-year, according to the

The study, now in its 24th year, measures problems experienced during the past 12 months by original owners of three-year-old vehicles (those that were introduced for the 2010 model year). Overall dependability is determined by the number of problems experienced per 100 vehicles (PP100), with a lower score reflecting higher quality.
 

In 2013, the dependability of models that were new or substantially redesigned for the 2010 model year averages 116 PP100, compared with 133 PP100 for models that were unchanged from the 2009 model-year—also referred to as carryover models. This is the first year that there are fewer reported problems for all-new or redesigned models than for carryover models since the study was redesigned in 2009. Models that were refreshed in 2010—those with generally minor changes to the interior or exterior—average 111 PP100 in the 2013 VDS.

"There is a perception that all-new models, or models that undergo a major redesign, are more problematic than carryover models," said David Sargent , vice president of global automotive at J.D. Power and Associates. "Data from the 2013 VDS suggests that this is not the case. The rapid improvement in fundamental vehicle dependability each year is more than offsetting any initial glitches that all-new or redesigned models may have."

Overall Dependability Improves
In 2013, overall vehicle dependability averages 126 PP100—a five percent improvement from the 2012 average of 132 PP100—and is the lowest problem count since the inception of the study in 1989. Among brands measured in the study, 21 of the 31 improve in dependability from 2012. Domestic nameplates have improved in 2013 at a slightly greater rate than have imports, narrowing the dependability gap to 10 PP100 from 13 PP100 in 2012 and 18 PP100 in 2011. Overall, domestic nameplates average 133 PP100, while import nameplates average
123 PP100.

"The continuous improvement in long-term dependability means consumers should have more confidence in three-year-old vehicles, whether they are keeping their current vehicle or shopping for a used car, truck, crossover or SUV," said Sargent. "This means there are a lot of dependable off-lease vehicles in the used-vehicle market. It also means that owners who keep their vehicle beyond the manufacturer's warranty period are able to have greater peace of mind that vehicles are becoming increasingly more dependable. That said, it is virtually certain that new vehicles being sold today will be even more reliable in three years."

Dependability Equals Higher Loyalty
The study finds that the fewer problems owners experience with their vehicle, the greater their loyalty to the brand. Combining previous-year VDS results with actual vehicle trade-in data from the J.D. Power and Associates Power Information Network® (PIN), J.D. Power finds that 54 percent of owners who do not experience any problems with their vehicle stay with the same brand when they purchase their next new vehicle. Brand loyalty slips to just 41 percent, on average, when owners experience three or more problems with their vehicle.

While owners of premium models are more loyal than owners of non-premium models, on average, the loyalty of premium model owners is more impacted by an increase in the number of problems experienced. For example, 55 percent of owners of premium models remain loyal to the brand when they report zero problems with their vehicle, compared with 53 percent of owners of non-premium models who report zero problems. Loyalty begins to decline as soon as the owner experiences any problems with their vehicle.  When experiencing three or more problems with their vehicle, loyalty among owners of premium models declines to 39 percent and 41 percent among owners of non-premium models.

"It's one thing to ask consumers if they intend to buy another vehicle from the same brand, but it is much more impactful to know what happens when they actually buy their next vehicle," said Sargent. "By combining our consumer research with trade-in data, we see a clear correlation between dependability and loyalty."

Highest-Ranked Nameplates and Models
Lexus ranks highest in vehicle dependability among all nameplates for a second consecutive year. Among models, the Lexus RX has the fewest reported problems in the industry at just 57 PP100. This is the first time in the history of the VDS that a crossover or SUV has achieved this distinction. Rounding out the five highest-ranked nameplates are Porsche, Lincoln, Toyota and Mercedes-Benz. Chrysler Group LLC's Ram brand posts the greatest year-over-year improvement from 2012—by 52 PP100.

Toyota Motor Corporation continues to perform well in long-term dependability and earns seven segment awards—more than any other automaker in 2013—for the Lexus ES 350; Lexus RX; Scion xB; Scion xD; Toyota Prius; Toyota Sienna; and Toyota RAV4.

General Motors receives four segment awards for the Buick Lucerne; Chevrolet Camaro; Chevrolet Tahoe; and GMC Sierra HD. American Honda Motor Corp., Inc., receives two model-level awards for the Acura RDX and Honda Crosstour. The Audi A6, Ford Ranger, Hyundai Sonata, Mazda MX-5 Miata, and Nissan Z also receive segment awards.

J.D. Power and Associates offers the following tips for consumers regarding vehicle dependability:

  • The perception that all-new or redesigned models can't be as dependable as those that have been on the market for a year or more is not accurate. Just because a model is new to the market or has been recently redesigned doesn't necessarily mean it won't be as reliable. In fact, dependability of all-new and redesigned models is at a record high, according to 2013 VDS data.
  • Dependability of three-year-old models is at an all-time high. If you can't afford a new vehicle, or simply don't want one, you should feel confident when buying a certified pre-owned (CPO) vehicle. Whether buying a CPO vehicle or not, be sure to check quality, appeal and dependability ratings of models you are considering on jdpower.com.
  • Improvements in vehicle dependability have been made by both domestic and import brands, and the gap between the two is narrowing. Perceptions of dependability should not be based purely on vehicle origin—consumers should research a variety of sources in order to make a decision consistent with the current reality of the market.

The Vehicle Dependability Study is used extensively by vehicle manufacturers worldwide to help design and build higher-quality models, which typically translates to higher resale values and higher customer loyalty. It also helps consumers make more informed choices for both new- and used-vehicle purchases.

The 2013 Vehicle Dependability Study is based on responses from more than 37,000 original owners of 2010 model-year vehicles after three years of ownership. The study was fielded between October and December 2012.



enthusiastx11enthusiastx11 - 2/13/2013 11:51:09 AM
+2 Boost
amazing how good cars have become! industry average is only 1.26 problems per car. love how JD powers changes the scale to 'problems per 100 cars' to actually make the differences look significant when they're not.


Agent009Agent009 - 2/13/2013 2:20:21 PM
0 Boost
126 (the industry average) is better than Top Dog Lexus scored in 2007 @ 145 (2008 was 120)

So the question is....... has the industry really made that much progress, or have the found a way to beat the study?



quizzquizz - 2/13/2013 4:43:20 PM
+1 Boost
I believe the industry has made progress in the last 5 years for the following reasons:
1. Defending class action lawsuits is expensive; survival requires that you are constantly on top of your game; yes folks, attorneys did some good here by forcing manufacturers to be more attentive to even the smallest details now.
2. Improved automation technology - with every generation of robotics, we are able to reduce the margin of error - everything is more tight fitting and can be designed more precisely to tolerances.
3. Evolution of electronic reliability - most issues arise from complicated electronic components in climate control, engine management, etc. But over time, evolution has allowed the most reliable processes to survive and eliminated the less reliable ones. We are now easily in the 10th generation of several technologies previously unproven outside of the lab. Whether hard drives or CPUs, electronics are generally more durable today than before. Compare the last generation of vacuum tube TVs in 1999 with the ones produced in the early 80's.

I don't doubt there may be some "gaming" of the system, but it shouldn't be surprising that the industry as a whole has improved their reliability over 5 years. Remember that LG used to be a crappy producer of home appliances in the 80's, called Lucky Goldstar - remember that?



quizzquizz - 2/13/2013 4:46:43 PM
+1 Boost
Interesting numbers, but generally very low for the Top 5; I've never ever had an engine failure and I've owned a Caddy, Olds, Lincoln, Toyota, Lexus, BMW, Nissan, etc.




PLAYPLAY - 2/13/2013 1:36:10 PM
0 Boost
They run forever, I think it is hard to dispute that.


knowitall1985knowitall1985 - 2/13/2013 5:39:59 PM
+1 Boost
Good job Mercedes, when they owned chrysler they hit rock bottom. They really have improved. Now if they just had some value.....


bfghemicudabfghemicuda - 2/13/2013 10:12:33 PM
0 Boost
When Diamler owned Chrysler they drove Chrysler down as they pillaged everything they could from Chrysler then put them up for auction when done and moved on. You that think Diamler bought Chrysler to try to help them and couldn't and it hurt Merc really don't know the true story.


knowitall1985knowitall1985 - 2/14/2013 10:35:55 AM
+1 Boost
As usual you don't know what your talking about. Mercedes lost millions when they sold chrysler. They took their eye off the ball trying to get chrysler gowing and mercedes quality hit rock bottom. They were getting killed with warranty claims. Im in the business 28 yrs.....


bfghemicudabfghemicuda - 2/14/2013 2:21:24 PM
0 Boost
Knowitall1985 Diamler received billions that Chrysler had in a "rainy day" account that was created by Iacocca. There motive was never to help or try to improve Chrysler. Hence the outcome. I have kept close track on Chrysler for over 40 years. I Have personal relationships with those in corporate, I am not wrong. What I mentioned is a fact. They claimed a loss in the sale but it was what they gained during the merger or like I prefer to call it a Hostile Takeover. Merc was already on a down turn and used Chrysler profits to improve Merc Finally give me a reason why Fiat is having record success with Chrysler when they aquired them as a gost town corporation but Diamler could'nt when they aquired Chrysler in good shape? Being in the business for 28 years you should know better.


bfghemicudabfghemicuda - 2/14/2013 2:55:18 PM
0 Boost
BTW Read "Taken For A Ride" How Diamler drove off with Chrysler.


knowitall1985knowitall1985 - 2/13/2013 6:13:54 PM
0 Boost
Lexus!!! WOW!!! 20 years of domination.....


vtandonvtandon - 2/13/2013 6:22:21 PM
+1 Boost
What really impresses me is Porsche. Good Job!


USNA1999USNA1999 - 2/13/2013 6:32:12 PM
+2 Boost
Mercedes is doing better than Honda and Porsche than Toyota? LoL!
I still think these studies are BS just like Consumer Reports.


MrEEMrEE - 2/13/2013 7:42:30 PM
+2 Boost
This is not what I would call long term, more like new car reliability for the 3rd year. I have a 2006 Civic > 92k and yet to have a problem, just maintenance items; battery, tires, front brakes, fluids, and two recall items. Maybe you would count the recalls even though they were preventative. My multiple vehicle experiences are right inline with with CR survey results. I would never buy without consulting CR results. Maybe not relevant to those that replace every 3 years.


lexworldlexworld - 2/13/2013 7:56:15 PM
+1 Boost
....Wow, -sportbike82 wants Honda to be #1 so bad he can taste it! As for Lexus, if anyone is surprised, dont be because the progress comes from great LEADERSHIP from the top down and that my friends is where MR. AKIO TOYODA comes into view. By the way Agent009, even Akio said before taking over in 2009 I believe, that his fathers Company was being run by proffessionals up to that point. So, that being said, Lexus and Toyota are seriously aiming to make the best build cars, trucks and suv's intentionally. The 90's I believe is when Akio's dad was CEO, and if you all know anything about cars, a Lexus anything was the best build quality car to buy and most of those models where over-engineered. Mr. Akio vowed to take his fathers Corp back to and beyond those past Glory Days! Jump on the bandwagon now! You'll be very glad you did!!!


FijianFijian - 2/13/2013 8:06:37 PM
+1 Boost
My Lexus LX470 started a small knocking sound in 2005 with 49k miles on it. Best thing I ever did was to tade that in for a Cadillac ESV Platinum. It is running like a champ with no issues. Lets talk about issues after the warranty is over. Thats when it really counts.Just look up consumer affairs about Toyota/Lexus engine failures and see how many there are.


MrEEMrEE - 2/13/2013 8:35:33 PM
+2 Boost
Ask your Cadillac service manager how many Northstar engines they have rebuilt.


FijianFijian - 2/13/2013 8:22:15 PM
+2 Boost
You might want to read this:

http://www.consumeraffairs.com/automotive/toyota_engine.html


LemonadeLemonade - 2/13/2013 8:32:14 PM
+1 Boost
You might want to read this:

http://www.consumeraffairs.com/automotive/cadillac-escalade.html

Just sayin....


LemonadeLemonade - 2/13/2013 8:33:43 PM
+1 Boost
You might want to read this one too:

http://www.consumeraffairs.com/automotive/gm_dexcool.html

Just sayin....


LemonadeLemonade - 2/13/2013 8:40:16 PM
+2 Boost
Oh look, here's more:

http://www.consumeraffairs.com/gm-news-and-recalls
*GM Wants to Void Pre-Bankruptcy Warranties
*"New GM" says it shouldn't be responsible for "Old GM" problems

What year is your Cadillac Escalade ESV?

By the way, how's that glass house holding up?


bfghemicudabfghemicuda - 2/13/2013 10:19:47 PM
+1 Boost
Well look at that, Ram right up there with Acura and Honda. Huh!


lexworldlexworld - 2/13/2013 10:22:51 PM
+2 Boost
-Fijian, I'm really not sure that you are telling the truth about that Lexus LX470. That engine is bullet-proof my friend. And you said you traded it in for a so called Caddy Escalade EVS? What ever you do, get rid of that thing and take the advice of some of these other guys. I've had many friends, family and uncles who are seasoned mech tell horror stories about those Caddy V8's, Northstar eninges included. I think you my friend just plain ole hate those Lexuses and Toyota's because YOU KNOW THEY ARE THE BEST, but you are not a believer. Mr. Akio need guys and gals like you, for feedback purposes. Good luck with that Escalade because you are going to seriously need it!



enthusiastx11enthusiastx11 - 2/15/2013 1:09:12 PM
+1 Boost
lexus is the best in an area where everyone is GREAT. doesn't make them much of a standout. industry average is 1.26 problems per car. lexus is 0.71.


skytopskytop - 2/14/2013 10:53:44 AM
+2 Boost
The JD Power chart is not mileage adjusted so the numbers are inaccurate and skewed.
Numbers don't lie but liars use numbers.

Look at the difference in "reliability" between the Chevy and the rebadged Chevy called a Buick. Same car, same parts, same everything but the badge but they show dramatically different results. Why? Because old people buy Buicks and drive far less miles so fewer problems are reported.





Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC