SPY PHOTOS: Latest Mercedes AMG Models

AMG Power for Mercedes C, GL, R-Class and CL...
Read Article

mstangpny07 - 8/17/2006 4:02:34 PM

+1 Boost

Those engines sound sweet.

jeffy210 - 8/17/2006 5:09:02 PM

+1 Boost

Though not on the list, I do have to ask about one of their AMG models. the CLK AMG (55, and 63). Will someone explain to my why the AMG trademark exhaust (dual twin tips) was neutered on the CLK? It has the same size engine as all of the other AMG counter parts yet only has a single twin tip. To me that is just a bad design mistake and makes it seem less than the other AMG's even though it's just as prestigeous. Was there a technical reason, or do they just keep forgetting? </end rant>

JeffLosAngeles - 8/17/2006 7:17:33 PM

+1 Boost

efoxS4, I guess the R63 might appeal to those Bev Hills housewives you don't want to be like all their friends at the spa driving Cayenne Turbos, Range Rovers and G55s.

BMW530i - 8/18/2006 3:55:10 AM

+1 Boost

R63 AMG, ML63 AMG and G55 AMG are totally pointless IMO.

Just like the BMW X5 4.6is, Porsche Cayenne (any model) and Range Rover Sport V8. Pointless.

BMW530i - 8/18/2006 3:55:13 AM

+1 Boost

R63 AMG, ML63 AMG and G55 AMG are totally pointless IMO.

Just like the BMW X5 4.6is, Porsche Cayenne (any model) and Range Rover Sport V8. Pointless.

M53R - 8/18/2006 5:43:05 PM

+1 Boost

more of those pointless cars to come.... R63 is just a waste of money. Its so damn ugly....ugh.

Matthew1 - 8/19/2006 4:01:27 AM

+1 Boost

Mmmmmm, over-powered minivans.

Tantalising.

lexusis350 - 8/23/2006 12:54:50 AM

+1 Boost

Who needs a station wagon/crossover (the r-class) to go 0-60 in less than 6 seconds.