FALSE Start? TIME Names GM's CEO, Mary Barra, To Its Top 100 Most Influential People — But, Why?

FALSE Start? TIME Names GM's CEO, Mary Barra, To Its Top 100 Most Influential People — But, Why?
Sometimes someone has to step out from the crowd and shout out the obvious. It's as though that Apple commercial with its commentary on '1984' is coming true. Folks are just marching in unison, staring into their smartphones and believing whatever is typed or displayed in front of them — even if it doesn't make sense.

Can anyone tell me WHY General Motors CEO, Mary Barra, is one of TIME's Top 100 Most Influential People?

I understand the print industry is in the can and needs to move books so it can still remain a going concern. In turn this leads to controversial moves to get attention. Recall Rolling Stone's decision to put the shameful Dzhokhar Tsarnaev on its cover? This list also puts Miley Cyrus in the Top 100, so, perhaps I should take it with a grain of salt but if I don't ask "what the hell is going on," then I don't think I'll be able to sleep tonight.

I understand that Barra was not in charge when this whole ignition thing went down; however, she must have been pretty high up, no? It seems like the old GM is the "new" GM, doesn't it?

Aside from working her way up and becoming a senior-level female executive, what else has Barra done? Frankly, I am sure there are plenty of other senior-level female executives that have done the same AND built a successful company that puts out great products.

Right now GM is in the midst of a scandal and, frankly, isn't putting out the best products. So, I ask again: WHY is Barra on this list? It's this kind of adoration of mediocrity that got GM stuck in this mess in the first place.

To me it seems far too premature to give an accolade without seeing what this all-new leader can actually do and if they're behavior is, in fact, something to aspire to. It's almost like giving a president the Nobel Peace Prize while they're engaged in two wars. Oops, did I say that?

What say you, Spies?


In a perfect world, gender shouldn’t matter. So it’s about time someone of Mary Barra’s caliber and experience was appointed to the coveted position of General Motors CEO. I’ve never had the privilege of meeting Barra, but although we are a number of decades apart, I’ve read her background and it is much the same as mine. She grew up in a working-class family, as did I, and fell in love with cars at a very young age. She fell in love with a red Chevy Camaro convertible, and I fell in love with the Model A my dad bought.

Only time (and the pundits) will judge Barra and the kind of job she’ll do for GM, its board of directors, its employees, the dealers and, most important, the people who buy its cars. If she remains as forthcoming as I’ve seen her on television with Congress, she will enjoy a long tenure at the helm.


Read Article

vdivvdiv - 4/28/2014 11:53:27 PM
-1 Boost
Becoming the first woman CEO of a huge multinational corporation, especially one that is dominated by males is a huge accomplishment. So on one hand she has made a positive impression on the board to appoint her, and on the other as a CEO she has the ability to guide not only GM, but also the whole industry.

One can argue that so far she has handled the fallout of the recall and the hearings relatively well. We shall see soon how well.


PUGPROUDPUGPROUD - 4/29/2014 7:48:07 AM
+1 Boost
Agree with vdiv comments above though my conspiracy theory is that the GM board was well aware of the coming ignition s**t storm of legal problems in advance and named her to soften the blows or even take the fall if all goes badly. Just saying there may be a hidden board agenda.


vdivvdiv - 4/29/2014 3:04:28 PM
0 Boost
It is quite possible, but if that has given her and GM the opportunity to change things for the better and she manages to do so then she deserves recognition. Bringing executives from outside the industry has not worked all that well for GM so I do not believe that the choice of Mary Barra for the position was a random or a superficial one. At the end of the day the recognition that a strong and well-functioning GM is good for the industry and the competition and certainly good for the investors and customers is what should drive our attitude towards GM's challenges.


Agent00RAgent00R - 4/29/2014 9:26:03 AM
+2 Boost
I hear you guys but there are better examples, like women in tech, if TIME wants to showcase a women getting ahead in a male-dominated space.


vdivvdiv - 4/29/2014 3:14:34 PM
+1 Boost
I would rather see Ms Barra as a capable executive, not just as a woman. Besides the auto industry and GM in particular are far more established, entrenched, and set in their ways organizations that are far more difficult to fundamentally change than the younger tech sector where change is everything.


vdivvdiv - 5/2/2014 2:36:57 PM
+1 Boost
Manufacturing engineering is the engineering of the GM factories that make the vehicles, not vehicles themselves. The defective ignition switches were made by Delphi based on poor specifications. How was she in a position to know about it or solve it?


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC