Toyota recalls another 650,000 vehicles for airbag flaws (for those that claim that recalls don't equate to reliability, so what do we call this? quality issues? reliability? safety issues?)

TOKYO (Reuters) - Toyota Motor Corp is recalling about 650,000 vehicles in Japan because of potentially defective airbags, expanding a costly recall it announced in 2013 because the supplier, Takata Corp, had not fully identified the problematic parts, the carmaker said on Wednesday.


Shares of Takata dropped after the announcement and were down over 4 percent when the Tokyo market closed.

A Takata spokesman said that more vehicles could be recalled by other manufacturers because of potential airbag inflator defects.

Carmakers including Toyota, Honda, Nissan Motor Co and BMW in 2013 recalled 3.6 million vehicles in total due to problems with the airbag inflator that could potentially explode and injure the driver or passengers. Those airbags were manufactured by Takata.

Honda and Nissan also said they were investigating whether they needed to recall more vehicles due to this problem.

Toyota said it was expanding the recall it announced in April 2013 that involved 2.14 million vehicles because the serial numbers that Takata had provided for potentially flawed airbag inflators had been incomplete.

In a further step, the Japanese automaker said it would instruct its dealers in the United States and other overseas markets to begin replacing suspect Takata inflators on all of the vehicles covered by last year's recall. Previously, the automaker had asked its dealers to inspect the airbags and only replace those that were judged to be defective.

Toyota said it had been notified of one case in which a defective airbag inflator had caused a seat cover to burn. It said all of the recalled vehicles were equipped with passenger-seat airbags that could be defective and deploy "abnormally" in the event of an accident.

Toyota vehicles covered by the recall include the Corolla and Camry sedans, and Tundra trucks.

Takata has acknowledged to U.S. safety regulators that it improperly stored chemicals and botched the manufacture of the explosive propellants used to inflate airbags.

The company has also said that it kept inadequate quality-control records which made it impossible to identify vehicles with potentially defective airbag inflators a decade or more after they were manufactured at factories in the United States and Mexico.

The Takata recall in 2013 was the largest airbag-related recall in history and came after a series of accidents and at least two deaths allegedly caused by faulty airbags.

Read Article

MattDarringerMattDarringer - 6/11/2014 10:15:40 AM
+4 Boost
I love the National Enquirer mentality of the moronic headline. Recalls are about customer protection. Recalling 650,000 vehicles does not mean that all 650,000 are unsafe, but rather than Toyota has identified a possible defect and is doing the right thing. Had GM recalled the cars with the POSSIBLY malfunctioning ignition switch all would have been well. Not all of the cars in the GM ignition switch recall experienced the problem.


Agent009Agent009 - 6/11/2014 10:55:35 AM
-2 Boost
And JD Power regularly reports issues that affect a small number of owners.

The difference is those reporting the quality are also the ones defining it. The definition of quality is a moving target depending on how to best present winners and losers. Then that list can be sold for big money.

If the scores are too tight then the report has little value to the industry. They want clear cut winners for advertising.


Agent009Agent009 - 6/11/2014 10:50:53 AM
0 Boost
First of all any recall is a quality issue.

The main reason most sites don't quantify recalls as reliability is they do not want to continually revise prior year studies. It is entirely possible that vehicles with stellar "reliability" scores in 2013 will be regulated to also ran status in 3 years due to massive recalls.

Remember these reliability and quality studies are money makers for those that create them. So there is little interest in sites like JD Power to go back and show the true quality 3 years later. They only want to sell the current report where there are winners of losers, not real world scores three years later.




800over800over - 6/11/2014 3:28:35 PM
+1 Boost
Remember that some of the sites take info from the consumer....so if a recall is a reliability issue is up to them. Consumer reports redoes their reliability rankings every year backwards. You may have filled in 3 past years of the car with no problems....in the latest year if you fill in that you've had a problem they add it to their data. If the consumer says it's unreliable it'll show up. Wether you or I consider it a reliability/quality problem matters not.


7msynthetic7msynthetic - 6/11/2014 3:06:50 PM
+3 Boost
For the most part, recalls are safety related. Warranties are for quality.


MrEEMrEE - 6/12/2014 8:30:09 PM
+1 Boost
The difference is a timely recall that fixes a potential issue before it becomes an problem, I would consider a reliability plus. A car maker that fails to recall, like others that used the same parts, that would rather settle lawsuits or let the customer eat the cost of repairs, is certainly safety or reliability negative. I value recalls outside of the inconvenience.


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC