REVIEW: Can The Ford Mustang's EcoBoost Motor Hang With The Big Boys? Well, Yes AND No...

REVIEW: Can The Ford Mustang's EcoBoost Motor Hang With The Big Boys? Well, Yes AND No...
When it comes to muscle cars, it's hard to top the likes of the Ford Mustang. Sure, right now there's the Chevrolet Camaro and Dodge Challenger, but over the years we've seen them come and go as the Mustang has held strong.

After getting an all-new, retro makeover in the early 2000s, the Mustang was resurrected from several rather awful generations of design. This Mustang though reminded people of the much revered 1960s original with a modern twist. As the saying goes, "it sold like hot cakes."

2015 Ford Mustang

The problem is, of course, how do you follow up something like that? Although the vehicle was refreshed, it still had cues that were reminiscent of the original. This had to be Ford's toughest all-new design it had to top.


2015 Ford Mustang

**Please note: pictured below is the GT model.










This leads us to our subject, the all-new 2015 Ford Mustang. Boasting a new look, it's a new take on the Mustang that enhances much of the design without revolutionizing it. Take, for example, the prominent front grille. It's increased in size as its an industry trend and ensures the vehicle makes a statement going down your local boulevard — no surprise there. The headlights are swept back with integrated turn signals and the vehicle's greenhouse isn't as bulbous as it is more of a fastback design.

Said to be inspired by the 1970s Mustang, there's no question when you see the all-new car it is one of the Blue Oval's pony cars. Controversial design or not, this is clearly a Mustang. Mission accomplished.

Getting more comfortable inside, the all-new Ford is clearly proud of its heritage although it isn't afraid to take advantage of today's latest and greatest technology. Sure, the dash design harkens back to a simpler time period, but the multifunction steering wheel and large infotainment screen in the center stack are quick reminders that we're in the computer age.

While the space has some nice touches, I feel like the quality has actually downgraded from the last-gen product to this generation car. There are some suspect trim bits, which makes me wonder how the Fusion has such a lovely interior space and the Mustang gets relegated to some components that make you say "WTF?"

Take, for example, the emergency brake that looks and feels especially cheap. Not too far away is the hard plastic center console with integrated cup holders that looks like something you'd find in an economy car. But here's the funny thing: Ford made sure the center stack is flanked with leather/leatherette trim to dress up the interior. Why bother when this is less than a foot away?

One of my biggest irks is the faux aluminum dash trim. It certainly looks the part but when you touch it, your brain immediately processes that it's plastic imitating the real deal.

The good news, at least, is that the all-new Mustang has good touch points with a great feeling steering wheel and even better stock seats. In EcoBoost and GT trim you can upgrade them for a set of Recaros if need be. They'll cost you $1,595, but in all honesty when you sit in them you won't remember how much you paid for them.


2015 Ford Mustang

**Please note: pictured below is the GT model.










Aside from the vehicle's all-new look, this generation Mustang is actually a landmark for a couple reasons. First, and most important, is the vehicle's suspension that features an independent rear (IRS). While purists have long argued that the old-school set up that's been ditched is what gives the Mustang its character, Ford really did all it could with such an archaic set up. IRS is a huge deal. Second, Ford has brought back the four-cylinder motor. Though this isn't the first time we've seen a four-cylinder Mustang, this one is far from being underpowered and barely capable of getting out of its own way.

Making 310 horsepower and 320 lb.-ft. of torque, the four-cylidner turbocharged EcoBoost powerplant is not wimpy. In fact, the six-cylinder motor is now the base offering while the EcoBoost engine is the middler. Whether launching the car or at highway speed looking to pass, power is not an issue in this Mustang.

Coupled to my test car's engine was a six-speed automatic transmission. While many of today's autos are fast shifting and almost dual-clutch-like, this isn't one of them. While it's not completely lethargic, it could use a bit of fine tuning to make it shift with a bit more urgency, in my humble opinion.

But, there is one problem for me with the Mustang's all-new powertrain: It doesn't sound particularly good. While four-cylinder motors are not known for an evocative tone or being the most refined, some automakers have done some excellent tuning to make them passable. Volkswagen, for instance, has a fantastic four-cylinder in the all-new Golf GTI. Ford's 2.3-liter EcoBoost is far from it. Not only does it sound groggy, at best, it's also quite harsh as it sends vibrations through the cabin.

Instead of feeling like I am in a performance vehicle, I feel like I am driving an appliance. To me, that's a big part of the sports car experience.

There still is good news, however. That's because the fuel-sipping four-cylinder earned 22 mpg over a week of mixed driving. Considering it produces over 300 horsepower and does zero to 60 in about 5.5 seconds, that's not a bad figure.

As noted above, the biggest and most critical change though is its suspension. Rather than feel the car skipping over big bumps and road imperfections, now the Mustang feels planted. While I used to joke that the Mustang's name was applicable as it felt like a wild, bucking horse at full tilt, now it's much more tame and controlled. This means you can drive it much faster with more confidence that you will not wind up sideways or in a ditch. While I am sure purists will argue the character has been removed, I think most will agree that this is a welcome change.

Rather than feel truly awful shutters that jar passengers throughout the cabin, when you come across a minefield of potholes, you will not try to do a U-turn and re-route to your destination. Bumps are handled quite well.

Ford has never been known for how its vehicles steer and, to be straightforward, the all-new Mustang will not change that. It's not particularly responsive or communicative, however, I had zero expectation it would be any different so this is par for the course.

So, what have we learned with the all-new Ford Mustang? Its essentially doing the same thing it's always been good at but it isn't much of a revolution. Sure, the vehicle now features an IRS but this is something that should have been done years ago to stay at the cutting edge of performance vehicles. Yes, it is a welcome change but even I have to admit that the Mustang does lose a bit of what made it special. While this four-cylinder Mustang is far from being "the secretary's car," it still isn't the full banana like the V8 GT variant.

It's nice to see Ford up the ante and continue to create problems for the Chevrolet Camaro and Dodge Challenger.


The Good:

- Though it may be a four-cylinder motor, don't be fooled: this thing has power
- Finally! Ford equipped the vehicle with an IRS — planted feeling that inspires confidence and lets you push it to the limit without getting unpredictably bitten
- While I wasn't keen on its design originally, I will admit it's grown on me and looks very impressive from the back in the flesh


The Bad:

- Especially groggy and unrefined four-cylinder motor, Ford needs to go back and put this through some more noise, vibration and harshness (NVH) testing
- If NVH wasn't bad enough, the motor does not make an inspiring sound — very appliance-like
- The automatic transmission could use some fine tuning to make it shift with some urgency


The Lowdown:

This all-new, EcoBoost Ford Mustang has me torn. Although I want to say its a bred sports car, it really doesn't sound like one and it doesn't have the liveliness one would come to expect from a sporty product. It really feels like a well done grand tourer rather than a muscle car. That's not a bad thing, just don't expect the four-cylinder Mustang to get wild and go sideways when doing a burnout. It's a big improvement when it comes to ride quality, how controlled the body is when putting it through corners and being able to pick up speed. It may not be a revolution, but it is, overall, a significantly better product than the outgoing Mustang. I just hope when it gets refreshed the Blue Oval dresses up its interior a bit more.


2015 Ford Mustang

**Please note: pictured below is the GT model.






















































































































MDarringerMDarringer - 7/26/2015 12:39:22 PM
0 Boost
As counterintuitive as this sounds, the base V6 automatic (with paddle shifters) Mustang for $25K is one hell of a performance bargain. It's fast and the handling is anything but secretary special. The allotment on the Ecoboost tends to be highly optioned. When people go online to the configurator, they like the Ecoboost's base price, but finding one on the lot is virtually impossible. Finding a base V6 is easy by contrast and when people drive it, they really like it.

I agree that aurally the Ecoboost is less than ideal.


jeffgalljeffgall - 7/26/2015 1:21:15 PM
0 Boost
If you want a true muscle car, spend the money and get the GT with a manual. I did in 2006 and have not regretted it for a second. Took mine out for a 100 mile drive yesterday and had a great time.


MDarringerMDarringer - 7/26/2015 2:37:32 PM
0 Boost
The 5.0 is wonderful, but again even though it has a reasonable base price you'll find ones on the lot optioned $10K higher and they sell pretty fast at that price point.

A fully optioned convertible that was $51K sold surprisingly fast.

The point is that the V6 Mustang used to be a total penalty box, but that's not true of the 15 models. All three are good sports cars.




jeffgalljeffgall - 7/26/2015 4:41:17 PM
0 Boost
Agree with that. If I couldn't find myself in a 5.0, I'd go with the 3.6. Much better than the 4.0 was around in 2006. Also, the V6 looks more premium today than it did 10 years ago.

It is amazing how much the price went up in 10 years. My almost fully loaded GT Vert stickered for about 33k.

With that said, if you can find the right mustang for you, this is the kind of car that you want to spend the time on and order if from the factory tailored to you tastes.


MDarringerMDarringer - 7/26/2015 5:25:43 PM
0 Boost
A buddy of mine had a fully optioned 05 GT ($34K new). An idiot ran a red light and totaled it. He replaced it with a base V6. Same power, MORE options, better handling for $10K less.


PrefurbiaPrefurbia - 7/27/2015 9:11:20 AM
+2 Boost
I regret the day I leased my Eco-Boost Mustang. Every time I hear a V8 go by I feel that this engine is seriously underwhelming from a sound perspective. I also own an Aston Martin and an original Buell, both of which the sound is a major part of the driving experience. At best under full acceleration the car is whimpy. It's a lease so I will not spend money on a new exhaust, but Ford really blew it. Also this car is massive, taking up more space in the garage than the CTS-V I used to own. There is something wrong when a Pony Car is larger than a Cadillac. I also agree with the cheap plastic - why not use fake aluminum on the console. Did not bother me at first, but as time wears on it simply looks - overlooked. Even though it's a lease, I'm sure an aftermarket kit will solve something the factory should have considered. My son has his name on a list for the New Camaro, actually first on the list. It will be an interesting comparison.


MDarringerMDarringer - 7/27/2015 10:16:08 AM
0 Boost
If you can afford an Aston Martin, why didn't you just go with a full-boat 5.0?


Agent00RAgent00R - 7/27/2015 1:15:52 PM
+1 Boost
Thank you for the comments, Prefurbia!


mini22mini22 - 7/27/2015 11:24:48 AM
+1 Boost
Ford needs to get the feedback on the ecoboost in order for them to improve it. Clearly it's not so much a power issue(although really 350 HP should be the minimum). How the thing sounds and feels is just as important. No amount of piped in phony sound is going to fix this. I would have gone the Camaro route and tuned the V6 done the ecoboost V6 to 350 HP. That would have sounded and felt better while letting the 2.3 4 be at the bottom wrung. Anyway it sounds like Ford has some work to do.


280SE280SE - 7/27/2015 1:39:13 PM
+1 Boost
This past weekend just spent 4 days with a new white 2015 V6 fastback model w auto transmission/paddle shifters, upgraded 18" rims, and black cloth interior (complements of Avis). The car looks absolutely stunning, sounds great, and commands serious respect on the road. The interior isn't the best, but when you think about where $25K went, I do not think complaints are justified (I would hope the experience is elevated for GT and Premium trim models, though). Felt great driving it, and with the windows up, the cabin feels very tight and sound. Having logged around 500 miles in a previous generation Mustang (2013 convertible V6) I'll say that I am disappointed by how massive the new car feels. And while the chassis feels vault-like, the steering doesn't feel as fun or as true as the last car. The turning radius has also suffered noticeably.


TomMTomM - 7/28/2015 5:10:16 PM
+1 Boost
The Mustang has been a perennial Chicks car for decades -
As long as it looks good - and makes the right noises - it will continue to sell.


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC