AWESOME or AWFUL? If Ford KILLED The Taurus, Would That Be A GENIUS Move Or A Poor Decision?

AWESOME or AWFUL? If Ford KILLED The Taurus, Would That Be A GENIUS Move Or A Poor Decision?
It looks like the Ford Taurus' days are numbered, if we're honest.

According to the latest reports, it seems like the Blue Oval may be thinking of putting a stake in the large sedan. With sales down a significant percentage, the only factor keeping the Taurus alive at the moment is that 20 percent of its vehicles are converted into police interceptors. And yet, most departments are still opting for the Explorer Police Interceptor over its sedan sibling.

At the end of the day, Ford's biggest enemy is itself. Simply put, the Taurus is not an especially competitive product. That's because its very own Fusion and Explorer are cannibalizing its sales.

The Fusion is a cheaper alternative AND get this, it has more room in the front and rear portions of its cabin. And that's been one thing I never understood about the Taurus. Although the Taurus is a BIG vehicle, its interior cabin space is completely inefficient.

In addition, buyers are still flocking to sport-utility vehicles. As you'd expect, Ford is not against that as Explorers have a higher profit margin than Taurus vehicles.

Having said all of this, would it be AWESOME or AWFUL if Ford KILLED one of its most well-known nameplates, the Taurus?


...U.S. sales of the Taurus, like many large cars, are tanking, down 28 percent through July. Ford unveiled a redesigned Taurus in April but said it was designed only to be built and sold in China.

Ford hasn't revealed any updates for the Taurus in North America, suggesting the current generation, introduced in 2009 and updated in 2012, will linger on dealership lots for at least a few more years. If sales keep falling, analysts speculate Ford could eliminate U.S. production of it and either import the small volume it needs here from China or leave the full-size sedan segment to its Lincoln brand, which will roll out the Continental next year...


Read Article

skytopskytop - 8/18/2015 1:08:11 AM
0 Boost
It's not the car. It's the car's classification that hurts it. American is not looking for family 4 door cars a longer. Crossovers, SUV's and truck are the public wants and needs. A 4 door car is so 'yesterday.'


MDarringerMDarringer - 8/18/2015 9:10:14 AM
+4 Boost
Incorrect. Family four-door cars are big business (Accord, Camry, Fusion, Altima, Sonata, Optima, Passat, Malibu, Mazda6...). Have you ever compared a Fusion and a Taurus? No? Let me tell you that if you did, you would discover how similar in size they are. The Fusion and Taurus are nearly equal on that account. Now factor in the Taurus' awkward styling (the tail is a hot mess) and the price premium to buy one and you realize that Ford has provided a disincentive to buy a Taurus.


TomMTomM - 8/18/2015 7:23:56 PM
+1 Boost
The current Taurus - which came from the Ford 500 - was a step backwards. The FORD 500 had a cavernous interior and lots of trunk space - when they "downdated" the car - it has far less interior room - so the Fusion is actually just as spacious for the most part.

Today - Lincoln dealers cannot survive on their own - so they are co-branded - either with Ford - or another Brand. So - it is likely you would see the Continental on the same sales Floor as a new Taurus. It is my understanding that the Continental will be far more pricey that the MKS it is replacing - and having a similar sized - much lower priced car next to each other will make it harder to sell the Continental. Since Ford is going to produce the Taurus for China - it will always be available if the find a market develops for it here.


jeffgalljeffgall - 8/18/2015 6:18:41 AM
+3 Boost
It never really was a Taurus. It was a Crown Vic with a Taurus badge on it (and a poorly done one at that). The true Taurus is the Fusion. Plus, I don't think the Taurus name had the brand equity Ford thought it did. Get rid of it and do a Fusion SHO with AWD.


MDarringerMDarringer - 8/18/2015 8:55:13 AM
+1 Boost
Killing Taurus production in the USA is a genius move. Given how Ford has taken Lincoln downmarket to Mercury levels, it follows that a "Taurus" should be a Lincoln entry model. Ford could import the small amount of Tauruses it needs from China. I mean after all Volvos are coming from China and soon a Buick.

The Fusion could conceivably be configured into a police interceptor, but the cops adore the Explorer Interceptor.


vdivvdiv - 8/18/2015 9:41:10 AM
+3 Boost
So in a couple of years Ford management will scratch their head once again realizing they need a full-sized sedan and once again will concoct one called Five Hundred (wait, what?!) only to realize the name is taken by a diminutive Fiat and say, OK, we'll bring the Taurus brand... back... again... for realz this time...


carsnyccarsnyc - 8/18/2015 10:22:12 AM
+3 Boost
What a mess. The inconsistency of it all is yet one more hurdle for the american auto industry. An Accord is an Accord and will always be so. Same thing for the Camry or a 3-series. Even Sonata is a nameplate now.


280SE280SE - 8/18/2015 10:34:16 AM
+4 Boost
I still believe the Taurus name has a lot of brand equity, not for being a sedan, but for being a quintessential family vehicle. Ford should evolve the Taurus with the times and collapse the current Taurus and Flex models into one 3-row futuristic crossover MPV vehicle (a la Tesla Model X). Call that a Taurus...Now that would be interesting.


MDarringerMDarringer - 8/18/2015 6:56:45 PM
+1 Boost
Unfortunately, the market research shows that more buyers by far know what a Fusion is over a Taurus.


222max222max - 8/18/2015 10:35:18 AM
+5 Boost
Ever heard of long in the tooth, Ford? The car is in dire need of a redesign... that's why sales are flat.


MDarringerMDarringer - 8/18/2015 6:58:22 PM
0 Boost
Indeed. It is built on the Ford D3 platform which originated in 1999 when Ford took the pre-existing Volvo P2 platform (S80) and made it less expensive to build.


gkearns56gkearns56 - 8/18/2015 7:18:45 PM
+1 Boost
@MDarr - I agree with your first comment on how the 4 door still has plenty of gas in their tank to compete. I don't totally agree with "killing the Taurus" off. Remember about 10 years ago when Ford made that IDIOT move of RENAMING the Ford Taurus to the Ford 500. The Ford buyers almost blew a gasket with that crazy rename. Within 3 years the brought back the infamous Ford Taurus name; kinda like Coke did when the changed their formula and people nearly crucified them. Those dedicated Ford buyers will always want that "Taurus" name in their family. Don't forget my I have an IDIOT brother worked for those UAW clowns for 30 plus years. I'll give him this one on keeping the Taurus name.


dumpstydumpsty - 8/19/2015 8:49:39 PM
+1 Boost
Killing the Taurus would take some real thinking & some really huge brassy balls. lol

Doesn't the Taurus currently share a platform with the Explorer & Flex - which are selling well? It's disappointing to find out that interior space closely matches the smaller Fusion. However bad the rear fascia, the SHO is a hoot to drive & the interior "felt" plenty more roomier than the Fusion - you sit much deeper than expected.

OK, the MKS is on its way out; its probably best that the current Taurus & Flex follows it out as well. I'm guessing that the Taurus is using the old Jag XF platform so Ford is definitely trying to get as much value out of that platform as possible.


mini22mini22 - 8/20/2015 12:45:43 AM
+1 Boost
It has less interior room than the Fusion and a lot more expensive. Saying this, however, Nissan keeps coming back with the Maxima so perhaps there is a still a market for it. On the other hand as Darringer said with the Lincoln MKZ there is little point now for a Taurus.


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC