Lexus going to large format video screen on next LX470

Lexus going to large format video screen on next LX470
Check out the size of the video screen on the 2008 Lexus LX470!

Sources tell us it will be the first vehicle to employ the next generation 'larger format' video screens...

lexusis350lexusis350 - 9/22/2006 4:47:51 PM
+1 Boost
That's way cool. The new LS has a big TV screen for the rear passengers. Maybe all of their new vehicles will have big screens too.


lexusis350lexusis350 - 9/22/2006 4:47:52 PM
0 Boost
That's way cool. The new LS has a big TV screen for the rear passengers. Maybe all of their new vehicles will have big screens too.


DanteDante - 9/22/2006 6:20:01 PM
+1 Boost
No,It's a little bit bigger but not by much.


I95SPEEDINGTICKETSI95SPEEDINGTICKETS - 9/22/2006 6:39:49 PM
+1 Boost
^^^^^^^^^^^^ Now That Would Be Something ^^^^^^^^^^^^


dbohnodbohno - 9/22/2006 10:14:29 PM
+1 Boost
Why are they going to a larger screen? They cannot enable video playback in the u.s.----maybe for europe? Possibly have persistent climate info while in nav mode? That would be a nice feature.




kart1kart1 - 9/22/2006 10:43:32 PM
+3 Boost
I want a large screen too. When is it coming out???

I think that Lexus does have DVD playback right? The only trick is that the car has to be in Park and the parking brake has to be engaged.


MercBasherMercBasher - 9/22/2006 11:11:03 PM
+1 Boost
For me this is very exciting news, I have a 2004 LX470 and its the best, most reliable comfortable vehicle I have ever been fortunate enough to own [including BMW, Mercedes, Rover] - however the current LX is way over-due for an update.


lexusis350lexusis350 - 9/22/2006 11:30:21 PM
+1 Boost
Will-
I would definantly buy an LX over an Escalade reguardless of interior. There was an Escalade at my Toyota dealership (I take my Lexus there to get it's oil changed) and next to it was a Land Cruiser and the Land Cruiser was so much more comfortable, and it isn't even a Lexus. Cadillacs aren't comfortable or stylish at all. I hate how the nose and rear of the car are pointed.


wangawanga - 9/29/2006 3:52:55 PM
+1 Boost
Call it escalades,we all know that it's just a yukon,
rap stars vehicles of choice.Navigator ang expedition
have better rating than GMC trucks>I'm not a Lexus/Toyota fan but they are more reliable than the 2
German monsters,oop i meant to say MB and BM.


S4cabriofoxS4cabriofox - 9/23/2006 12:04:45 AM
+1 Boost
And this has its own article, why?

lexusis350-

The Escalade is a far superior car, engineering-wise at least. I love the LX, but it's fallen behind the times terribly. The recent '05 update has kept it semi-up-to-date, but the engine is so old tech that it's laughable. Mercedes only needs 3.5 liters to come up with 270hp, and in a 3.5 liter engine, Lexus itself makes more than 270hp! The Escalade, although with a significantly larger engine, delivers a superb 403hp and actually has acceptable mpg.


00JT00JT - 9/23/2006 12:51:22 AM
+1 Boost
S4Cabriofox,

If you forget Lexus has a 3.5 liter that also makes 270 hp in the RX350. The 4.7 liter unit in the LX470 is used across the Toyota/Lexus lineup. It has been reguarded as one of the smoothest and refined engines of its time.


MPowerMPower - 9/23/2006 2:22:24 AM
0 Boost
As time passes more and more lexus owners are losing thier sight. Lexus is a smart company. How else is an 80 year old man/woman going to see? Bigger screens. Duh.


mitchatlexusofmarinmitchatlexusofmarin - 9/23/2006 1:38:27 PM
+1 Boost
I've sat in the LS460- the screen is very similar to this one.


lexusis350lexusis350 - 9/23/2006 7:40:36 PM
+2 Boost
S4cabriofox-
"Mercedes only needs 3.5 liters to come up with 270hp"
-----------------------------------------------------
I think it's safe to say that with an SUV the size of an LX 470, they aren't necessarily looking for high horsepower, they're looking for high torque. That's how it is with all full-size SUVs, they need the torque for pulling power.


RupertRupert - 9/24/2006 4:02:02 PM
+1 Boost
lexusis350,

bmws 4.4 x5 has more torque and power than the LX.
the 3.0 diesel x5 has more torque too (49 lb/ft more) and 17 less hp.
also the engine only meets eu 3 standards (we are now on eu 4), and has shockingly high CO2 emissions (387 g/km), more than the 4.2 supercharged range rover, a far faster car (4 seconds faster, and in a car that is also heavier!) with 165 bhp MORE!.
it is a very inefficient engine.


S4cabriofoxS4cabriofox - 9/24/2006 9:28:17 PM
+1 Boost
OOJT-

I mentioned that the 3.5L in the Lexus made 300hp. I didn't mention the RX unit.

lexusis350-

Ditto. I was also saying that Lexus makes much better engines than this 4.7L if you noticed (I didn't only use Mercedes as an example).


lexusis350lexusis350 - 9/24/2006 11:02:03 PM
+1 Boost
Toyota's new Tundra is said to have somewhere around a 5.8 liter V8, which will probably carry over to the Land Cruiser and the LX. But, it is true, the current LX generation has been around way too long. They still look good though.


RupertRupert - 9/25/2006 11:29:05 AM
+1 Boost
the 5.8 wouldn't be the only engine, they wouldn't sell any in europe. hopefully a nice new diesel and perhaps a 3.5 v6? a lexus suv isn't exactly supposed to be a rocket anyway is it?


jeff329jeff329 - 9/25/2006 11:53:51 AM
+1 Boost
lexusis350,

"Lexus only needs 3.5 liters to come up with 303hp"


lexusis350lexusis350 - 9/25/2006 11:17:43 PM
+1 Boost
But they also need torque for towing and hauling. 3.5 liters won't pull a trailer. Power isn't everything, at least not in a truck or SUV.


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC