REVIEW: Land Rover Range Rover TD6 — Does A Diesel Motor RUIN or IMPROVE The Luxury Experience?

REVIEW: Land Rover Range Rover TD6 — Does A Diesel Motor RUIN or IMPROVE The Luxury Experience?
In the world of rough and tumble sport-utility vehicles, to me there is only one really excellent product that stands head and shoulders above the rest. That would be a Land Rover Range Rover.

While commonly confused with the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, the big daddy Range is the full banana. That means it's a bit larger, a bit more capable on- and off-road, and it's more luxurious. My personal favorite is the long wheelbase though I reckon the super luxurious Holland & Holland model is simply to die for.

Range Rover TD6

But what if you want something with better fuel efficiency? The reality is that the Supercharged versions have trouble eeking out more than 15-17 mpg if you're lucky. We've been waiting eagerly for a solution and while they've sold diesel products overseas, the U.S. market was never lucky enough to receive them.

Until now.

There's just one problem, however. Volkswagen's Dieselgate fiasco has poisoned the well. As the VW situation is still to be determined, we cannot blame consumers for questioning diesel purchases. Rather than hark on the VW's mess and its potential impact on diesel sales though, we're going to focus on the product.

Approaching the big daddy diesel, I have to say that upon looking at its exterior you would never know this is an oil burner. Aside from the discrete TD6 badging on its ass end, this looks to be, for all intents and purposes, a non-differentiated Range Rover.


Range Rover TD6










The interior is more of the same. Leather adorns just about everything, there's a tasteful amount of wood and the seating is as supple as ever. There's no peculiar odors or anything of the like as I've noticed in some other diesel-fueled products. It's a proper Range Rover. Hell, even the infotainment system is wretched — please, Jaguar Land Rover, do something about this as soon as possible.

Clearly, not much has changed.

What has changed though is the engine. As noted previously, it is a diesel mill. Good for 254 horsepower and 440 lb.-ft. of torque, this turbocharged six-cylinder engine is a workhorse. Coupled with this powerplant is an eight-speed automatic that doesn't feel any different from the conventional gasoline-powered Ranges. Shifts happen but they're not noticeable or jarring. Comfort and luxury is the emphasis here.

After spending so much time in the Range Rover's supercharged variants, I was expecting this engine to be a bore and a snoozefest off the line. Although I know diesels do have quite a punch of torque, you have to remember that the big daddy weighs in at about 5,000 pounds. That's a lot of weight to shift around whether trying to get on a freeway or coming to a stop.

I am happy to report the engine is able to get the Range Rover moving with adequate pace. Zero to 60 happens in 7.4 seconds.

Also impressive is the amount of refinement engineered into the TD6. It's evident that the research and development staff kept noise, vibration and harshness (NVH) top of mind. While there's a bit of grogginess at the low end and a bit rumbly at idle, which is to be expected in any diesel, it's hardly noticeable once you start turning revs above 1,200 rpm.

When I picked up a family member who's in the market for a Land Rover Range Rover, they didn't even realize it was a diesel. She was more interested in the accoutrements and interior design, which she found a bit too minimalistic. Considering she's the target demographic to a "t," this was even more proof to me that the NVH is more than taken care of with this diesel engine.


Range Rover TD6










One thing that struck me as problematic though were the vehicle's brakes. In other Range Rovers I've driven I've never had such a poor experience. I had to apply a good amount of force with each stop and the brakes gave me little in return. Are they adequate, yes, but could they use some work? Absolutely. I don't expect F-Type SVR performance levels of braking here but I shouldn't feel as though every time I need to halt it's an "OMG" moment.

Aside from that, it's the typical Range Rover experience. The vehicle's steering rack feels like it's out of a Jaguar sedan, the ride comfort is excellent and it's not particularly exciting in the corners as the center of gravity is too high, which means you will feel it lean.

Now here's the kicker. As noted previously I've seen 15 mpg in the Range Rover Supercharged models in the city and up to 17 on the highway. Considering it's a 500 horsepower monster, that's actually not awful. With the Range Rover TD6 though I accomplished a healthy 25 mpg after one week of mixed city and highway driving.

I was actually surprised by that number as it is a monumental leap forward. To say I was pleased would be an understatement. I feel as though the TD6 crushed my expectations. JLR did this one a solid.

Now the question remains: Will buyers be scared off thanks to VW's mess? I hope not. They'd be missing out on a good thing.

The Good:

- NVH is kept well in check, so much so that passengers didn't even remark
- MPG is up to 25 — not bad for a large SUV weighing about 5,000 pounds
- Everything is as you'd expect in a Range Rover

The Bad:

- The TD6's brakes need improvement in feel and in stopping power — it felt like it wasn't nearly enough
- JLR's infotainment system on some vehicles is downright poor — this is one of them
- I cannot get a Range Rover LWB with the TD6 powerplant

The Lowdown:

Probably the biggest problem with a diesel-powered Land Rover Range Rover is that it has landed on our shores at, possibly, the worst time ever. Due to Volkswagen, there's no way to tell if this will hamper the TD6's sales. Aside from that, the Range Rover delivers a superior experience that bests any other competitor. Assuming, of course, you're not expecting a killer infotainment experience. Barring that, the Range Rover to me is the benchmark large luxury SUV and it proves that again. Now if JLR offered a LWB TD6, that would be the one I'd like to have in my driveway.


Range Rover TD6




















































































































MDarringerMDarringer - 4/30/2016 3:34:19 PM
-1 Boost
If you can afford a Range Rover why would you want diesel?


Agent00RAgent00R - 4/30/2016 4:44:23 PM
-3 Boost
I'd want one.

Significantly better mpg with essentially zero trade off. Just would want the LWB.


MDarringerMDarringer - 4/30/2016 5:36:03 PM
-3 Boost
@Agent00R The point being that if you can afford the Range Rover, you can afford the gas. Buying a vehicle that easily costs over $100K and then worrying about MPG is a bit ridiculous.


mre30mre30 - 4/30/2016 5:42:31 PM
0 Boost
The trade off is much higher maintenance costs and reliability issues post-50,000 miles vs the gas engine.

I got my GL450 serviced at 40,000 miles and the service advisor basically told me to trade it in before the warranty is up. Basically diesels are heavy polluters and all the ad-blue stuff are band aids that eventually end up expensively failing. For example, for emissions purposes all diesel engines now have extensive insulation at the top and BOTTOM of engines to speed warm-up. Because the engines now run so hot, they cook the oil, which cooks the gaskets, which creates oil leaks, which no one knows about because it leaks into the insulation UNDER the engine.

The EPA has basically ruined things for all us consumers. The EU regs are much less stringent and the diesels last longer over there.

I went away upset because I otherwise really love my GL350 diesel!


Agent00RAgent00R - 4/30/2016 7:29:18 PM
-3 Boost
I understand, Matt, but many new age consumers do not want to 1) waste fuel with their DD, or 2) waste their $$$.


MDarringerMDarringer - 4/30/2016 9:53:58 PM
0 Boost
@Agent00R ditch the bullshit factor and own that you aren't green


Agent00RAgent00R - 5/2/2016 7:02:32 AM
-3 Boost
Matt, once again, making silly statements.

I never said I am green; however, I consider the economics of...everything. In addition, I do like holding onto my hard-earned dollars. And, I do like electrics and diesel products as they serve a purpose.


jameswisrikjameswisrik - 5/3/2016 7:29:25 AM
+1 Boost
RANGE ROVER/LAND ROVER...MY TOASTER LOOKS BETTER AND IS MORE RELIABLE.


TheSteveTheSteve - 4/30/2016 4:05:17 PM
+1 Boost
I have a well-appointed Audi Q5 with a 3.0 L V6 diesel (turbocharged), and I love it. No truck-like clatter, smoke, or smell. 428 fl-lbs of torque delivers muscle-car acceleration, with 0-60 mph times of about 6.4 sec, and effortless uphill passing, from any speed. But if I drive sedately, I can get insane fuel economy (51.8 MPG (real, not indicated) on a 528 mile trip from VA to FL, $21 in fuel).

The combination of luxury, power, and efficiency turns my crank. (VW/Audi's Dieselgate does not). I would have saved a few grand by buying a slightly quicker 3.0L V6 gas engine, but knowing that after about 4.5 years of driving, I'll be saving about 1/3 off fuel as compared to the 2.0L I4 gas base model... well, that has it's appeal to me.

FWIW, I'm one of those weirdos who gets a thrill out of besting my previous best fuel economy for a trip.

Yeah, I'm a diesel fan, when it's done right (even though I'm pissed at VAG for Dieselgate).


knowitall1985knowitall1985 - 4/30/2016 4:35:29 PM
+1 Boost
RUIN!!!


atc98092atc98092 - 4/30/2016 7:41:43 PM
+1 Boost
"There's no peculiar odors or anything of the like as I've noticed in some other diesel-fueled products."

Not sure what diesels you've been driving. I've never had a trace of diesel smell at any time from my Passat, even after backing into the garage. Same with any BMW or MB diesel I've driven. The HD pickups or large semi trucks you still might get a whiff of something, but nothing with modern emissions equipment. I don't even smell anything lately behind school buses, as our district has a fairly modern fleet.

Bottom line, almost the only time you'll ever smell diesel is at the pump, if the nozzles aren't cleaned well.


deaHelkcunKdeaHelkcunK - 5/2/2016 8:15:01 AM
0 Boost
You're missing the biggest benefit with the diesel. The incredible range means about half the fuel stops. I drove my wife Cayenne diesel from South Florida to Toronto on one stop (1500 miles). The performance off the line with all that torque is better than most of the gas variants and you can very easily lose your license with this thing.


TheSteveTheSteve - 5/2/2016 11:03:52 AM
0 Boost
deaHelkcunK: regarding your southern Florida to Toronto (Canada) trip, I bet you had plenty of range remaining when you arrived in Toronto, too.

My understanding is that the Cayenne has a 26.4 US Gallon (100 liter) fuel tank, and that's part of the reason you get such good range. Assume you burned nearly 2 full tanks (2 x 25 gallons = 50 gallons total), and compare that to the miles traveled (1500, according to your post above), and that works out to 30 MPG, which isn't huge.

I speculate you *didn't* run your tank almost to dry, and that you get much higher fuel economy. My 2015 Audi Q5 3.0 TDI has only 19.8 US gallons (75 liters) fuel capacity, and in my last Florida-to-Canada trek, I got a true 45.24 MPG one way, and 44.18 MPG on the return trip (1,135 miles). That's a range of over 850 miles on a ~20 gallon tank. That's very respectable for an SUV.


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC