Nissan Wants To Battle X1 And Q3 With A Premium Crossover - Shouldn't That Be Infiniti's Job?

Nissan Wants To Battle X1 And Q3 With A Premium Crossover - Shouldn't That Be Infiniti's Job?

Nissan is pressing on with a new range-topping Qashqai based on the matt black Premium Concept unveiled at the Geneva motor show in March.

Nissan was non-committal about the model’s chance of production success when it was first revealed, but an introduction date of 2017-2018 has since been pencilled in.

The Qashqai Premium Concept, which was styled in the UK at Nissan’s European design studio in London, is intended to be a test bed to push the crossover into a new £30,000-plus price point, possibly badged Tekna+, to battle more premium compact SUVs such as the Audi Q3 and BMW X1.
 


Read Article

jeffgalljeffgall - 5/20/2016 12:20:10 PM
-2 Boost
Nissan is dilutional. They think Infiniti is on par with BMW and Nissan is a sub-premium brand, or at least that is the perception they want out there in the customers eyes. The reality is they are not doing many things well.


cidflekkencidflekken - 5/20/2016 12:39:43 PM
+4 Boost
I thought Infiniti was already doing that with the QX30????


countguycountguy - 5/20/2016 2:47:22 PM
+2 Boost
Yeah I was also thinking that the QX30 could do that, but since people seem to love CUV's now, it couldn't hurt to have one in the Nissan line, so they hit them from above and below.


TheSteveTheSteve - 5/20/2016 12:48:51 PM
+1 Boost
I sometimes see “brand confusion” (or lack of brand clarity, or brand definition) in the automotive sector, where each related brand appears to behave autonomously rather than under the direction of the parent company. In my mind, Nissan should address the lower and mid-market, while sister brand Infiniti should address premium/luxury offerings.

We see a similar situation in the Volkswagen Audi Group (VAG) where VW, an economy brand, has offerings that overlap with Audi, a premium/luxury brand: The VW Touareg is priced higher than the Audi Q5 and even the Porsche Macan (!), and the now defunct VW Phaeton was priced similarly to an Audi A8.

It just doesn’t make sense to me.


TomMTomM - 5/20/2016 10:47:59 PM
+2 Boost
The problem is that each of these Marques have a product manager - and a set production/sales goal. (It may actually be set in profit dollars). So - when one product manager sees an opening for something that can easily be piggy back produced on another model - they're in. Obviously it is the Corporate management that should be watching for these things - and trying to prevent overlap. Trouble is - especially today - Crossovers are selling like hotcakes! And since the upper management also has a profit goal - they look the other way in regards to overlap. This is the problem Chrysler had when they had Plymouth and Dodge - and GM had Olds/Buick - or Pontiac/Saturn.


MDarringerMDarringer - 5/20/2016 4:33:01 PM
0 Boost
Now that Nissan plans to own Mitsubishi, maybe they can use Mitsucrap for this model.


TomMTomM - 5/20/2016 10:51:34 PM
0 Boost
Actually - I would think that they would use the one thing that Mitsubishi had left in its portfolio - ie - Micro Cars - that don't sell in the USA. They make up by far the majority of Mitsubishi sales - but unless you travel in 3rd world countries or some areas in Japan - you don't see them - they don't come here or go to Europe. Like Most manufacturers - Nissan is running into production limits - and adding


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC