2018 Nissan 370Z News, Rumors, Specs

The article was written by someone with ZERO command of English and was incoherent in several places. If the illustration is correct, I have been proven wrong. I thought Nissan could not possibly have made the Z uglier, but if the chop is correct, dear god that's disgusting.

The person who wrote this needs to be banned from writing here overall, as news content like this makes my blood boil. I cannot understand why any of you would fall for such nonsense, since the actual car looks nothing like it nor is anything written here of relevance.

Skip past articles like this and move on, if not written by reputable users or the primary trio of AS authors. Jonsea and lana82 are spammers, essentially hijacking Auto Spies' news feed.

MDarringer, you need to get your eyes checked. When was the last time you saw any car beautiful other than a Hyundai. Seriously thing before you write.

Sorry. I have to side with MDarringer. What a hot mess. The Bucky Beaver one-tooth grill. The silly swoops and swirls that plague all the current Nissans are front and center in this eyesore. One Asian cliché after another. They're coming close to the Lexus Origami School of Design. Wait—Nissan is worse because it makes absolutely no sense. At least Lexus had to design something that would take the focus off the God-awful spindle grill they seem to love.

I'd tell you to go penetrate yourself, but I realized you are dimensionally challenged.

I'd tell you to go penetrate yourself, but I realized you are dimensionally challenged.

MD: I'm assuming you're talking to "monster". Lol.

That IS the Murano nose - you seriously want your sports car to share the same front as your SUV? UGH.

Common design language is one thing, but the sports cars (GTR, Z) should have their own design language that reflects their sporty intentions, because an SUV's design language reflect its off-road, manly intentions. The two have different design sensibilities. Just because something looks good on a high riding Murano does not make it look good on a sports car that sits low to the ground.

@Dexter1 Yes, you and I posted at the same time.

For a sports car this is way to old and the restyle is not real helpful. They should have saved the money and used it to develope the new car. Let this one die off...

Had a 1990 twin turbo when it first came out with new design and it was awesome at the time. Drove a recent Nismo and while it was hoot handling wise, the engine, the sound and the interior were awful. Time for Nissan to start with a clean piece of paper but I think they have lost their way and don't want to spend the money. They are so caught up with the GTR that while a monster has no impact on the sales of their other cars. I would suggest combining GTR and Z cars into a new model priced closer to the top of the line sedans and SUV's...say a base price of $55K.

Matt is 100% correct that pic is hideous. I find nearly every Japanese car ugly or boring. I don't much care for the Koreans either but their stylists are significantly better than Nissan/Toyota & Honda. A "Z car" needs to not be a new version of the glorious original Z's but that's a good place to start. A new Z needs to be a budget F-Type but better looking... that's what started it all in the first place.

The Z needs to be priced like the Mustang and Camaro and not be yet another expensive Japanese masturbatory exercise like the NSX, GTR, and most likely the coming Supra. Building a mainstream sports car that isn't severely compromised is one thing the Japanese just don't get. Affradable (Miata/GT86) gets you an underpowered wheezer and Japanese power comes at Porsche prices and, Honey, no Japanese brand has the panache to command Porsche/AMG prices.

Auto Spies, I suggest that you ban jonsea and lana82 from posting on this site. They are nothing but spam-bots, that post useless rumours all across the internet in poorly written English and many others like them regarding upcoming redesigns and future vehicles.

My advice to everyone that reads here, please dismiss their articles as being pure fluff. The quality of content has gotten eons worse on here and typical search engine results from their corruption of each.

I don't see why anyone that isn't Agent001, Agent00R, or Agent009 should be presenting articles on this site.

I wish that many of you were smarter than that to fall for such drivel. The rendering is highly inaccurate, if not extremely lazy. It doesn't look like that, trust me on that.

I spend so much time debunking inaccurate news in the automotive industry and would consider such sources of information, to be the worst of the worst in regards to their track records. I do not consider Auto Spies to be reputable, but trust Agent00R, Agent001, and Agent009 over these idiots spamming this site. Please dismiss them.