REVIEW: Is The All-New BMW M2 The ONE To Get? 00R Drives And Tells In This M Rated Review...

REVIEW: Is The All-New BMW M2 The ONE To Get? 00R Drives And Tells In This M Rated Review...
While it’s pretty standard that every BMW M car is eagerly anticipated, we do have to point out that every once and a while the Bavarians have something a bit more special on its hands. Though many look forward to the launch of an all-new M3 or M5, there’s something to be said for the little guy.

Last seen as the 1M coupe, the teeny M-rated product was a leviathan. Easily the best driving M car I’ve ever piloted, I have been in pursuit of a solid example for over 12 months now. With only 739 units available for public consumption in the U.S. market, there's plenty of stiff prices and poorly modified vehicles available. It's been tough.

BMW M2

But now that the all-new M2 is here, perhaps it is time to forego a seemingly impossible quest. After all, it is the 1M’s successor and there’s plenty of hype that this vehicle packs a special punch. My goal was simple: See if the M2 could divert me from my quest. Let’s see how our subject faired out.

Arriving to me painted in Long Beach Blue, it is clear that this isn’t your run-of-the-mill BMW 2-Series. Equipped with some distinguishing characteristics, the M2 looks like a standard 2-Series’ steroid-infused cousin. Not so keen observers will note its much more aggressive front clip that has much larger air intakes flanking its center, the larger wheel and tire combination that looks very M3/M4 inspired, a larger track front and rear with massive hips, and of course, a quad-tipped exhaust.


BMW M2










It doesn’t take too long of a walk around the M2 to figure out that it is a much cleaner and sharp design than the 1M. It still has a tinge of goofiness to its look, but I am fine with that. The same can be said of the highly coveted 2002 and E30 M3.

On the inside there’s nothing shockingly different going on in the M2. Compared with the rest of the BMW product portfolio it is considered a Spartan interior though I would argue it is a rather comfortable and luxurious space. I see it this way: If I cannot order it without an infotainment screen and I have to accept power seats then it is not a Spartan BMW any longer.

To differentiate the M2 over other 2-Series vehicles, there’s a healthy use of Alcantara as well as a contrasting blue stitch throughout the cabin. This isn’t groundbreaking as it is a similar treatment to what we saw in the 1M.

Though there has been much written about how the driver’s seat is peculiarly angled, personally, I did not find that to be a problem. Perhaps I’ve been sitting crooked in every car up until now? I don’t know, I just didn’t feel it like the others have noted. Personally, I thought the driving position was OK, though I wish it were lower, and I found visibility to be excellent in all directions. In the 2-Series there’s a bit more glass than the M4, which seems to have larger blind spots.

If I were a betting man, and I am, I’d wager that you’re not too interested in these elements though. You really want to know how it drives. Let me indulge you.

Equipped with a 3.0-liter inline six-cylinder engine that’s aided by a turbocharger, the M2 makes an impressive 365 horsepower and 343 lb.-ft. of torque. My test vehicle arrived with a six-speed manual gearbox though you can tick the option box for the dual-clutch transmission (DCT). Tipping the scales at 3,450 pounds, it’s light by modern car standards. Zero to 60 happens in 4.4 seconds with the stick and 4.2 second if you order it with a DCT.

The clutch’s take up is on the smaller side though it doesn’t bite back if you’re a bit careless now and then, and the pedal’s weighting is also on the lighter side when compared to previous M cars I’ve driven. This is actually welcome. The shifter is easily put into each gear with a more fluid feel — it doesn’t fight you — and snap-into-place satisfaction.


BMW M2










While the M3 and M4 can be had with adjustable everything these days, the M2 I piloted only benefited from a rocker switch to toggle different driving modes a la every BMW now made. After putting it through some twisties, you quickly realize that this M car is an agile little thing. That’s because the steering is light by BMW standards but what really makes it shine is how direct its steering rack is. Now I’ve driven a lot of vehicles by the blue and white, but I don’t recall any vehicle from the Bavarians having steering this sharp and precise. Although that’s a bonus it does suffer by being numbed out and uncommunicative — not a surprise in today’s market where electric power assisted steering rules.

Really getting on the throttle in corners, I have to make mention that the vehicle, overall, feels quite planted in Sport +. In M Dynamic Mode; however, it will get a bit of a wiggle in its ass end in a very playful and predictable manner. The M2 is a flirt, which is a good thing, because that’s what makes driving fun.

What stood out to me above all else though is how the M2’s suspension is tuned. Driving the M2 around Manhattan and New Jersey’s suburbs I noticed how well dampened the vehicle is. Even hitting bumps that would be devastating for other autos I’ve driven, the M2 handles them with ease. I would have expected it to be kidney crushing but it wasn’t in the slightest. Compared to how previous Bimmers were set up, the engineers deserve a pat on the back for their work here.

If I were to sum up my total experience with the M2, there are two major takeaways.

First, this car is supremely fast. When you get on the throttle, you’re going to get up and moving extremely quick. Perhaps it’s just me but the car feels a bit faster than the M3s and M4s I’ve piloted. Where I found it particularly pleasing is on highways where you can pass with ease thanks to the mountains of torque. Drop the car a gear and you’re off!

Second, to me the all-new M2 really makes the M4 feel a bit dated. You see, when you put the M4 into Sport + and dial up the settings the steering rack gets too heavy and devoid of feeling. It makes the M4 feel a bit overkill. In the M2, however, the car operating at its peak settings feels nimble, sharp and direct.

If you’re a driver, you’re going to want the M2. Simple as that.


The Good:

- Exterior styling that truly differentiates the M2 from the M235i — there’s no confusing what you’re seeing
- Excellent motor with gobs of power — torque for days
- Surprisingly well tuned suspension with great damping on less-than-ideal roads


The Bad:

- What happened to simple BMWs with cloth and manual seats, and no infotainment systems
- What happened to BMW’s unique steering racks that spoke to the driver and, ultimately, differentiated the brand's driving experience
- For an M car, there’s something missing from it — there’s no lust here


The Lowdown:

One of the main reasons I love providing you with a breakdown of The Good and The Bad at the end of my reviews is because it really spells out the vehicle’s strong and weak points. With the all-new M2 there’s a lot to like, no doubt. And, in my humble opinion, it really makes the M4 obsolete if you’re purely seeking for a driver’s car. There’s just one problem with the M2 for me. There was absolutely zero lust. When I would go for my errands or even a short cruise there was no urge from me to extend the ride or even hop back in. I simply locked it up and walked away. That’s a huge problem because this is the type of car I usually claw to get back into and that special feeling just wasn’t there. The last time I drove a 1M, on the other hand, I didn’t stop thinking about it for two weeks. Hell, I almost went and paid WAY too much money for one against my better judgment — almost. With the blue M2 I just could have cared less. I think that’s because it may actually be a bit too refined and lacking that certain raw character that pervades M cars. Hopefully this is not an early indication of an all-new theme within M because that would just be sad. Really, that would mean the end of enthusiast’s hearts pumping the tricolor and, frankly, that may just very well explain why E30s, E36s and E46s are in such high demand today.


BMW M2












































































CANADIANCOMMENTSCANADIANCOMMENTS - 8/27/2016 4:08:41 PM
+2 Boost
Tri-colour on the grill would be nice and on the steering wheel somewhere. Nice effort by BMW.


TomMTomM - 8/27/2016 6:31:42 PM
+3 Boost
Will somebody explain to me why BMW is still producing the 5th generation 3 series - bodies - for most of its cars? Rolls Royce hay be able to do that based on very low production numbers - but BMW need to modernize its designs - they are getting like Honda - too long in the tooth.


carloslassitercarloslassiter - 8/27/2016 8:40:05 PM
+4 Boost
Some people (such as yours truly) like BMWs partly for the classic style, so whenever I read a comment like that from TomM I just shake my head. If you want the latest toy or some psuedo modern crap, go buy a Lexus or Infinity.


GermanNutGermanNut - 8/28/2016 5:07:55 PM
+4 Boost
It's not what you want that matters. BMW is getting lapped by Mercedes-Benz in the U.S. market as well as globally. The boring "same-old exterior" styling is likely a major contributing factor for BMW falling behind (along with interiors that don't look as luxurious as the competition's).


TomMTomM - 8/28/2016 8:17:31 PM
+2 Boost
I own a Mercedes S 600 thank you - - Infiniti and Lexus are second tier premiums to me - a level below - and I don't want that junk either.

I have no objection to a manufacturer keeping styling themes for a long time - BUT - clearly some manufacturers have managed to update the styling over years - while clearly differentiating between the old models and the new ones. AUDI and BMW have failed at that for the most part. AND both are guilty of making it almost impossible to tell their big expensive cars apart from their smaller cheaper models from a distance.


MDarringerMDarringer - 8/28/2016 8:32:30 AM
+2 Boost
The M2 looks cartoonish and boy racer. BMW has really lost its way stylistically. It's standard cars look a decade old and their uprated ones just put a bunch of fussy styling touches on the dull standard car's lines and they call it good.


GermanNutGermanNut - 8/28/2016 5:09:52 PM
+3 Boost
I 100% agree with you. BMW's styling is frozen in time and buyers are fed up. While the Mercedes-Benz S-Class, E-Class and C-Class all look very similar to each other, they at least look different than their versions from 10 years ago.

Mercedes-Benz is crushing BMW in the U.S. market as well as globally.


MDarringerMDarringer - 8/28/2016 5:35:11 PM
+1 Boost
Not much engineering prowess separates the German 3, but Audi and BMW are embracing stylistic stagnation whereas Mercedes seems vibrant.


GermanNutGermanNut - 8/29/2016 10:21:15 AM
0 Boost
At least Audi has indicated it will take its styling in a different direction than what it is currently and will differentiate between models.

BMW has not indicated such for its design strategy and every spyshot we have seen of the upcoming 5-Series and 3-Series confirms that BMW is not planning to make any major design changes in the foreseeable future.


mini22mini22 - 8/28/2016 7:05:23 PM
+3 Boost
I agree that Mercedes styling is generally better than anything that BMW has in it's staple. However in terms of the best sporting drive mixed with bang for the buck it has to be the M2.I like the flair the extended grills and spoilers. it is the closest you can get to the old school M3's out there. The M4 to me is a disappointment and the GTS is 130 grand. I'll put up with not perfect electric steering. Look you get room in the back and you not paying 80 grand for a base Cayman with essential options and a four cylinder engine that sounds like a Subaru.


ScirosSciros - 8/28/2016 9:10:45 PM
+3 Boost
Don't like it. It looks chubby, like all 2 Series. They can put all the aero effects on it in the world and give it 400hp, and it'll still look chubby.


TomMTomM - 8/29/2016 8:46:31 AM
+2 Boost
No LUST - the problem is - there are now a lot of competitors for this type of machine - at many price points - so a car that hit all the buttons once - no longer does. In addition - since these cars are mostly small - they are basically two seaters with a package shelf in the back - so as long as they have good front seat travel - they compete with the larger but still small cars like the 3 series. And it depends on what you are looking for. If you want a real race track car - the Cadillac V-series is more like that. The BMW has softened itself to more a road course driver. AND Mercedes has moved into even more luxurious territory. Still - there is precious little difference between the top of the line "sport" cars - where once there were clear differences. There are just so many choices that no manufacturer can hit the bullseye for everyone anymore. I still think back to my 450SEL6.9 as being the one car that could do what it could - at that time - and it was a clear choice if you could afford it. Nobody was even sort of close.


focalfocal - 8/29/2016 1:23:57 PM
+3 Boost
MB has crowd pleasing design and has made their interiors stand out. I actually don't like their new exteriors. At least they take chances. BMW tried to take chances with the Bangle butt and the market place bought it up but the critics/traditionalists hated it. They definitely went conservative with the current generation cars and appears next generation is the same style language.

As all cars get too fast for the legal street limits, branding, tech and style are the only differentiations. MB recognizes that. The only way to get people to buy a new car ever 3-5 years is to get them to lease and change the style drastically. Old school differences in driving dynamics are not resonating with the new buyers. All you need is style, mega HP and brand.

As for the M2, it's a great package. The flared rear fenders really adds to the design. For a 2+2 coupe, it's all you need and renders the M4 redundant IMHO. If you wanted real utility, get the M3 four door. The main differentiation is still offering the 6MT while Audi/MB have given up on it.

Drive a Cayman/Boxster and except for the engine, the dedicated sport car chassis and care in the tuning makes it a more enjoyable sports car. Although it isn't as good as a daily driver compared to the M2. I was fortunate to get an allocation for a Cayman GT4. It definitely trumps the M2 for what I wanted. My daily will continue be the 3 series. All because these companies still have a 6MT.


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC