BMW And Hyundai Score Big As JD Power Takes a Stab At Ranking Automotive Tech Usability

BMW And Hyundai Score Big As JD Power Takes a Stab At Ranking Automotive Tech Usability

BMW and Hyundai each have two models that rank highest in overall customer experience with vehicle technology in their respective segment, according to the J.D. Power 2016 U.S. Tech Experience Index (TXI) Study,SM released today.

The inaugural study measures a vehicle owner’s experiences, usage and interaction with driver-centric vehicle technology at 90 days of ownership. The major technology categories analyzed in the study include collision protection; comfort and convenience; driving assistance; entertainment and connectivity; navigation; and smartphone mirroring.

BMW models that rank highest in their segment1  are the 2 Series (small premium segment) and 4 Series (compact premium segment), while the Hyundai models that rank highest are the Genesis (midsize premium segment) and Tucson (small segment). Model-level rankings and awards include 2016 model-year vehicles that were all new or redesigned within the past three years.

Other models that rank highest in their segment are the Chevrolet Camaro (midsize segment); Kia Forte (compact segment); and Nissan Maxima (large segment).

Safety Technologies Reign

Among the vast array of technologies available in new vehicles, those that assist with collision avoidance have the highest usage and the highest overall satisfaction. Additionally, they are the technologies owners most want in their next vehicle, according to the study.

Collision avoidance technologies—such as blind spot warning and detection, lane-keeping/centering and back-up camera/warning systems—are collectively part of the collision protection category, which has the highest overall satisfaction among the five groups of technologies included in the study index scores, with a score of 754 on a 1,000-point scale. In contrast, owners are least satisfied with their navigation systems (687).

“For any technology in a vehicle, it’s critical that the owners want it, are aware they have it and know how to use it,” said Kristin Kolodge, executive director of driver interaction & HMI research at J.D. Power. “It is alarming how many technologies consumers have in their vehicle but aren’t using because they don’t know they have them or don’t know how to use them. Both of these knowledge gaps have long-term implications for future demand.”

Back-up camera/warning and blind spot warning and detection are the most often used technologies, with at least three-fourths of owners saying they use the technology every time they drive. Additionally, they are the most in-demand technologies, with 96% of current owners of the technologies saying they want each of the features in their next car.

Other industries beyond automotive are keeping a close eye on in-vehicle technologies. For example, the insurance industry is closely tracking the use of safety-related technologies that, while potentially increasing claims costs when a vehicle is damaged, also help prevent or mitigate collisions and protect occupants when there is an accident. Auto insurers have been slow to add discounts for newer safe driver technologies, but that is beginning to change. Liberty Mutual Insurance offers a vehicle safety discount for teens driving a vehicle equipped with safety features, such as a lane departure warning system; adaptive cruise control; and collision preparation systems.2

“As auto insurers begin to offer discounts for vehicle safety features, this may help raise consumer awareness that they actually have these technologies and the knowledge to use them properly,” said Jessica McGregor, director of the insurance practice at J.D. Power.

The Role of the Dealer

Even if owners are aware they have an in-vehicle technology doesn’t mean they will use it.

Among owners who say they never use a specific technology, 39% indicate they bring another device into their vehicle to replace certain technologies that are already present. Of those who bring in another device, navigation is the feature most often replaced. Furthermore, 57% of owners who bring in another device say they never used the in-vehicle equipment before bringing this outside device into the car to replace the vehicle’s features. Of the 43% who have used it, 56% stop using it within the first month. 

“The dealer plays a critical role in whether or not a technology is used,” said Kolodge. “When the dealer takes the time to explain the technology or provide a demonstration, it not only makes the owner aware they have the technology, but also helps them understand how to use it, which means they are more likely to use it, continue to use it and, because they see the value, want it in their next vehicle.”

Among owners who learn how to operate the technologies from their dealer, overall satisfaction is 25-54 points higher, compared with those who learn how to operate the technologies from another source or from prior experience. Technologies that owners say are difficult to use (DTU) put a strain on satisfaction.  Across all technologies, there is an average 98-point drop in satisfaction when owners have DTU issues.

DTU problems not only deteriorate satisfaction, but they also affect the vehicle’s quality. Even though it may operate as intended, when a technology is difficult for an owner to use or understand, it is likely to be considered a quality issue. For example, navigation system difficult to use/poor location is the sixth most common problem in the J.D. Power 2016 U.S. Initial Quality StudySM (IQS). Owners who learn how to use their navigation system from the dealer report 2.0 problems per 100 vehicles (PP100) fewer navigation DTU problems than those who do not get a dealer explanation.

“By taking the time to show the technology to the new owner, the dealer can mitigate DTU issues, improving both satisfaction and quality,” said Kolodge. “The navigation system is just one area. If the dealer explains all or many of the technologies to the new owner, it can have a dramatic positive effect on the ownership experience.”

Gap between Premium and Non-Premium Is Narrow

Overall owner satisfaction with new-vehicle technology averages 730. Satisfaction among premium vehicle owners is slightly higher at 734, compared with 730 among non-premium owners.

Overall satisfaction varies greatly by segment. Satisfaction is highest in the large segment (755), followed by the small premium segment (735); compact premium segment (732); midsize premium segment (731); compact segment (727); midsize segment (725); and the small segment (706).

“It’s not just how much technology you have in the vehicle, but how well it’s delivered,” said Kolodge. “The technology’s usability and how well it is integrated into the vehicle are critical—that has to be done right.”

The 2016 U.S. Tech Experience Index (TXI) Study is based on a survey of 17,864 vehicle owners and lessees. Awards are based solely on responses from the 13,269 consumers who purchased or leased a new 2016 model-year vehicle in the previous 90 days that has been considered an all-new or redesigned vehicle within in the past three years. The study was fielded from February through August 2016.
 



GermanNutGermanNut - 10/10/2016 3:42:46 PM
-9 Boost
It certainly isn't helping BMW's sales in the United States. It shows that customers likely care more about exterior design and interior look and materials quality than technology usability.

Audi's MMI, Mercedes-Benz's COMAND and BMW's iDrive all more or less do the same things in different ways.


TheSteveTheSteve - 10/10/2016 11:06:13 PM
+2 Boost
GermanNut wrote “…Audi's MMI, Mercedes-Benz's COMAND and BMW's iDrive all more or less do the same things in different ways…”

With respect to cars, Hyundai, BMW and Lamborghini ALSO “all more or less do the same things (get people from A to B) in different ways”, and yet virtually every consumer sees substantial differences in how they get that done. The same can be said for all the infotainment systems and other tech out there.



carsnyccarsnyc - 10/10/2016 5:53:37 PM
+4 Boost
GermanNut, what little love I have for Audi suffers everytime you desperately try to position it at Merc and BMW levels.


TheSteveTheSteve - 10/10/2016 11:12:12 PM
0 Boost
I'm a long-time BMW owner (4 vehicles across 18 years, with several in the garage at the same time). I'm now on my first Audi, a 2015 Q5. As much as I love many aspects of the vehicle, and feel they're at least on par with what I've experienced in 18 years with my BMWs (loved each one, BTW), I must say I'm not favorably impressed with Audi's MMI. I expected something MUCH better than what feels and looks somewhat like DOS.

(For Audi fans who are about to jump in to defend their beloved MMI, hold your breath unless you DON'T have the factory NAV system. Audi sells different versions of the MMI, depending on which options you get. No NAV, and the UI is monochromatic and primarily text based. No icons).


MDarringerMDarringer - 10/11/2016 8:16:58 AM
+1 Boost
It is rather amusing to watch though.


GermanNutGermanNut - 10/10/2016 6:23:39 PM
-1 Boost
That's okay, when I looked for who the arbitrator was in terms of the German 3 competing against each other I didn't see carsnyc or any other Autospies commenter.


GermanNutGermanNut - 10/11/2016 9:35:51 AM
-2 Boost
TheSteve, go sit in a 2017 Audi A4, Q7 or the new Q5 when it arrives at showrooms - the technology is far more advanced than what is in your 2015 Q5.




TheSteveTheSteve - 10/11/2016 4:16:42 PM
+1 Boost
GermanNut: When I was shopping for my current car, I DID go to showrooms and I sat in cars and tried things out. Nobody, not the Audi website, not the dealer, not the salesman, NOBODY said "Oh, BTW, if you don't get the optional factory NAV, you get a much lesser MMI system." Furthermore, nobody indicated that Audi offered different versions of MMI. Additionally, the Audi showroom only had vehicles with the factory NAV system, to show off their best. Similarly, reviews done by TV shows, magazines and online always review the best the manufacturer has to offer -- they didn't mention the lesser MMIs, presumably because they didn't know about them.

So unless the consumer was suspicious, and took pictures, and got statements from Audi/dealer/salesmen that the product I am ordering is identical to these pictures: Caveat Emptor.

While I agree with you that the new (totally redesigned) Q5 will have "far more advanced" tech than the previous generation, I still emphatically state "Caveat Emptor," because I don't trust Audi (the brand), Audi dealers, or salespeople to disclose any product shortcomings. The same may apply to other brands.


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC