STUD or DUD: Is Singer Vehicle Design's All-new, $41,000+ Watch WORTH The Price Of Admission?

STUD or DUD: Is Singer Vehicle Design's All-new, $41,000+ Watch WORTH The Price Of Admission?
If you haven't heard of Singer Vehicle Design, you've probably been living under a rock for the past several years. This is the SoCal-based company that's been taking vintage Porsche 911s and doing the most stunning retromods; however, you would hardly know it.

That's because the vehicles have an insane amount of attention put into each and every build. And, at the end of the day, they look like factory cars — except those who know the deal will immediately see where the big investments came into play.

It seems that the six-figure rebuilt Porsche 911 game is getting a bit, well, boring.

This seems evident as Singer has decided to take on an all-new space. High-end luxury watches. Or, if you're a real snoot, timepieces.

Although there's no question that the company's partnership with Jean-Marc Weiderrecht has resulted in a staggering movement, what about the rest of the watch? From a design perspective, it's painfully obvious it's inspired by the 1970s Omegas. And its central chrono seems a bit...outrageous.

What say you, Spies? Is the all-new, Singer Track1 a STUD or a DUD? Would you pick up this one of 50 piece for $41,000 plus?



The watch we have here is the "launch edition" of the Track1, which is limited to 50 pieces. It is priced at 39,800 CHF (approximately $41,350 at time of publishing). Case, 43mm x 15mm, in titanium; 10 ATM/100 meters water resistant. Movement, AgenGraphe chronograph/Singer Reimagined cal. 6361, 34.40mm x 7.18mm; column-wheel and snail cam controlled central chronograph with 60 hour power reserve, and instant-jumping hours and minutes. Strap, woven calf leather; titanium pin buckle.


Read Article

TheSteveTheSteve - 6/9/2017 2:47:46 AM
+3 Boost
Nah, I wouldn't pay $41,000 for ANY watch. That's just me.

Mind you, I've seen Singer's work. They do custom work on old Porsches, restoring them to "better than new" condition with a mix of original and custom components. I'd contract them if I had the need (and ability to pay). Their work is outstanding!


MDarringerMDarringer - 6/9/2017 8:48:52 AM
-2 Boost
This would be a "time piece" not a mere watch.

I derive much hilarity watching some of the men I work with who walk around with a Rolex on their wrist, but they take out their phones to check the time.

I teased one about it and he told me it would be "obscene" not to wear a watch and I replied that it would be obscene not to wear underwear, but that it had never stopped me in the past. He missed the irony of the reply.


supermotosupermoto - 6/9/2017 4:35:09 PM
+3 Boost
If someone wore a watch, why would the look at the phone to see the time? Makes no sense.

The only time I use my phone for the time is when I'm overseas and what to see what time it is in my other offices.


MDarringerMDarringer - 6/9/2017 9:08:28 PM
-2 Boost
Because--dimwit--people are always on their phones so they just look at the time on the phone. Watches these days are jewelry and nothing more.


CANADIANCOMMENTSCANADIANCOMMENTS - 6/12/2017 1:43:46 PM
+1 Boost
I used to wear a decent watch, a Tag Heuer I bought in the late 80's before they jacked up there prices. What was $600 became $2600. The crown used to always dig into my hand too. These days I wear a 10 year old Polar RS800CX HRM watch. Tells me the time and serves as a subtle reminder to not eat "this" or "that" or even buy it from the grocery store. Watches are much easier to live with if your wear French cuff shirts I find as well. Button cuffs never seem to be the right size.


TheSteveTheSteve - 6/12/2017 2:42:26 PM
+1 Boost
I bought a Gucci back in the days when I needed to broadcast my upward mobility (AKA "conspicuous consumption"... Steve hangs his head in shame). I haven't worn a watch in years. I carry my smartphone (biggest pocket-watch ever), which obviously tells time ;-)


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC