VIDEO: Tesla's Model S Gets TRUMPed In IIHS Small Overlap Front Crash Test — TSLA Dismisses Results

VIDEO: Tesla's Model S Gets TRUMPed In IIHS Small Overlap Front Crash Test — TSLA Dismisses Results
The Tesla Model S has been a complete game changer in the electric vehicle community and, frankly, the automotive space at large. As the company prepares to roll out the first batch of production Model 3s that are expected to broaden the appeal of the marque, the pressure is on.

Will it be a boom or bust? Time is counting down until we find out.

If you've been following the price of TSLA these days, you may have noticed the company had a bit of a slide this week to the tune of about 13 percent. One of the reasons behind this was the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety's (IIHS) testing of the Model S.

Although the Model S scored the best possible rating everywhere else, it only received an "acceptable" in the small overlap front crash test. This is notoriously the most difficult crash test in the industry and has been responsible for resetting safety expectations.

Wondering why the S received that score? Well, that's because the Model S' seat belt was not able to keep the crash test dummy's head from slamming into the steering wheel. According to reports this was seen in earlier tests of the Model S; however, it's pretty clear there were no lessons learned there.

To make matters worse, Tesla's response has been quite dismissive. I am paraphrasing here but essentially the company said that private organizations have agendas and that the most accurate safety ratings come from the U.S. government.

[Crickets]

Because the government doesn't have an agenda? Pft.

Maybe the PR team could have just taken "the big bath" on this one and said we'll revisit the seat belt design and get the car back in for more testing with IIHS. I mean, it is only considered the industry standard. Mind you, the Lincoln Continental, Mercedes-Benz E-Class and Toyota Avalon all were rated higher in this specific crash test.


...In the tests conducted by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), the seat belt in Tesla's Model S was not effective and could lead to the driver's head striking the steering wheel hard through the air bag.

Ford's Lincoln Continental, the Mercedes-Benz E-Class and Toyota Motor Corp's Avalon received the highest rating overall, the agency said on Thursday.

Tesla's Model S received the highest rating in IIHS's crash testing in every category except one, the small overlap front crash test, where it received the second-highest rating available, a Tesla spokesperson said in an email...


2017 Tesla Model S (models built after January 2017) 40 mph small overlap IIHS crash test

Overall evaluation: Acceptable

 

 


Read Article

MDarringerMDarringer - 7/8/2017 11:39:02 AM
-6 Boost
I'm obviously no fan of Tesla, but the IIHS has one and only one function and that is to create and produce test results that justify higher interest rates among the companies that own the IIHS and keep them in business.

Tesla owners are more wealthy. Thus, finding a way to charge them more for insurance rids them of some of that cash in their pockets.

This is a money grab by the insurance industry.

The IIHS's protocol is not scientific nor are the results statistically accurate.


vdivvdiv - 7/8/2017 12:57:53 PM
+4 Boost
All that said Tesla claims to take safety rather seriously so dismissing the crash test results is in contradiction. If Tesla doesn't trust these results let's hope they can provide others that they do, perhaps with the Euro NCAP.


SanJoseDriverSanJoseDriver - 7/8/2017 5:08:08 PM
-6 Boost
There is some bias with the IIHS, and considering they are backed by insurance companies it is in their best interests to steer people away from both EVs and Autonomous Cars.

That being said, this does seem like a common crash scenario, so hopefully Tesla will fix this for the next round of testing. They already made one adjustment to the seat belts, but that didn't do the trick.


Vette71Vette71 - 7/8/2017 11:46:49 AM
+5 Boost
Tough week for Tesla with the stock now trading in bear territory although still higher than a year ago. Today the financial community opened a new negative. Tesla is committing to building the biggest battery on earth in Australia, made up of their battery power modules, in the next 100 days or it is free, at the same time as they are doing an aggressive ramp up of the Model 3 (batteries needed) while in the just completed quarter production of Models S/X fell short due to lack of batteries. General disbelief that they can pull that off. Something has to give!


vdivvdiv - 7/8/2017 12:55:30 PM
+2 Boost
Normally what gives is time. The gigafactory has been rolling out cells for the powerwalls and powerpacks now for a few months. The ramp up for the Model 3 will likely be slower than expected.


SanJoseDriverSanJoseDriver - 7/8/2017 5:10:24 PM
-4 Boost
30 in month one to 100 in month two to 1500 in month three sounds pretty slow to me... was hoping for a faster ramp to be honest. If they can get to their target of 20k cars by Dec, then 2018 should be a great year.


MrEEMrEE - 7/8/2017 1:11:32 PM
0 Boost
Acceptable rating is hardly bad, but does sound like a better pretensenser could bump the rating.


CANADIANCOMMENTSCANADIANCOMMENTS - 7/9/2017 10:07:40 PM
+3 Boost
It is the hardest test they perform and it certainly does reflect real world accidents. In prior years you would see the A-pillar fold up and kill/maim the occupant. As MrEE stated, an adjustment to the seatbelt pre-tensioner would easily fix this issue and the test dummy head would stay on the deployed steering wheel airbag.


SanJoseDriverSanJoseDriver - 7/11/2017 5:32:31 PM
+2 Boost
If you define safety by the lowest probability of death in a major crash, then it is.


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC