Porsche Leads All Automakers In 2017 JD Power APEAL Rankings - Mini Top Mainstream Brand

Porsche Leads All Automakers In 2017 JD Power APEAL Rankings - Mini Top Mainstream Brand
Car owners’ general satisfaction with their new vehicles shows one of the strongest gains ever, according to the J.D. Power 2017 U.S. Automotive Performance, Execution and Layout (APEAL) Study.SM Overall vehicle appeal increases by 9 points (on a 1,000-point scale) from last year—from 801 to 810—which ties for the largest gain in the 22-year history of the APEAL Study.

Accounting for this jump in overall customer satisfaction with vehicle performance and design are better scores in nine of the 10 categories that the study measures compared with 2016, plus increases in satisfaction with 19 of the 32 brands included in the study.

“Many automakers are getting better and better at giving consumers what they want in a vehicle,” said Dave Sargent, vice president, global automotive at J.D. Power. “The industry is doing a very good job of creating vehicles customers like across every segment, and the APEAL Study identifies why this is. One clear reason is that non-premium vehicles are increasingly offering technology and safety features found in premium vehicles.



Gap Narrows between Premium, Mass-Market Brands
The latest study shows that the satisfaction gap is narrowing between premium and mass-market vehicle brands. The average APEAL index score for the non-premium segment (804) improves by 10 points over the 2016 study, while the premium segment (now 845) improves by just one point. The gap between the two segments now stands at an all-time low of 41 points.

Several models score high both in the APEAL Study and in the J.D. Power 2017 U.S. Initial Quality StudySM (IQS). Eight of the models that earn APEAL segment awards also receive awards in the IQS: BMW 2 Series; Chrysler Pacifica; Kia Cadenza; Kia Niro; Kia Soul; Mini Cooper; Porsche 911; and Porsche Macan. The all-new Genesis brand ranks second in both APEAL and IQS this year, while Porsche is the highest-ranked nameplate in APEAL and third in IQS.

“Manufacturers are making ever-higher quality vehicles, but this is not coming at the expense of performance, styling, utility or features,” Sargent added.

Porsche Stays On Top; Chrysler is Most Improved
For a 13th consecutive year, Porsche (884) receives the highest overall APEAL score. Genesis (869) ranks second overall, followed by BMW (855), Audi (854) and Mercedes-Benz (851). Chrysler (815) is the most improved brand—scoring 41 points higher than last year (774). Other badges that improved dramatically year over year include Mini (+30 points), Nissan (+27 points), and Honda (+25 points).


Volkswagen AG leads all other automakers with six segment-level awards for its various models, followed by BMW AG with four. The Porsche Macan scores a hat trick in this year’s study, receiving an award for a third consecutive year. The BMW 2 Series, BMW X1, Chevrolet Tahoe, Kia Soul, Mini Clubman, and Porsche 911 each receive segment awards for a second consecutive year. The individual award winners are as follows:

    Volkswagen AG: Audi A3; Audi A4; Audi A7; Porsche 911; Porsche Cayenne; and Porsche Macan
    BMW AG: BMW 2 Series; BMW X1; Mini Clubman; and Mini Cooper
    Ford Motor Co.: Ford F-150; Ford Super Duty; and Lincoln Continental
    General Motors Co.: Cadillac Escalade; Chevrolet Bolt; and Chevrolet Tahoe
    Hyundai Motor Co.: Kia Cadenza; Kia Niro; and Kia Soul
    Fiat Chrysler Automobiles: Chrysler Pacifica and Dodge Challenger
    Honda Motor Co.: Honda CR-V and Honda Ridgeline
    Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.: Nissan Altima and Nissan Murano


Consumer Tips

Based on the study, J.D. Power offers the following consumer tips:

    Consider vehicles from automakers that consistently win awards for multiple models, especially those that win consecutive awards.
    Consider vehicle brands that show dramatic improvement in customer satisfaction compared with the previous study.
    Consider vehicle brands that show a consistently high level of customer satisfaction over a period of several years.
    Many vehicle owners form an emotional bond with their new car. Treat the APEAL rating as a factor in your purchase decision, but not as the deciding factor.


cidflekkencidflekken - 7/26/2017 2:08:01 PM
+12 Boost
Oh, dear lord. Everyone hold on because Nuttie is going to NUTS that Audi "lost" to BMW by a point. Look for the 50-email chain about Audi's better quality interiors, new-design direction, new Q8 and A8 that are going to increase sales by a gazillion, and so on.


MDarringerMDarringer - 7/26/2017 3:11:13 PM
+5 Boost
JD Power and their statistical analysis of apples-to-oranges pseudo-data.


TomMTomM - 7/26/2017 8:17:54 PM
+7 Boost
Still another "Poll"of potential customers that tells us NO information about the actual questions asked of the people - and who the people were who were polled. AS a result - we are left with a lot of unsupported gobbledygook tat fails to show anything concrete about its conclusions - other than one should NOT use this Ranking to determine much - if anything.

For example - it is noted that a number of Mass market manufacturers are adding features that were once only available in more expensive cars - something that has been happening for a century or so. (Believe it or not - you do not need to turn a crank to start your engine anymore!)

In addition - it does not even mention whether the cars tested for are New to the market or have been available for several years. The newest cars with the newest features tend to have more problems for example.


GermanNutGermanNut - 7/26/2017 11:54:02 PM
-6 Boost
Too bad for BMW it's high APEAL score has not translated into rising sales YTD in the U.S. market.



FirewombatFirewombat - 7/27/2017 4:01:01 AM
+3 Boost
Some surprises here, like why Jeep is so low and Land Rover so high? Also would have expected VW to be higher...

It's a great result for some brands, like Audi, too bad their ranking here can't translate into moving from 4th place in sales the U.S. behind Lexus, where they have been for so many years now. Maybe more exciting styling or a new styling direction would translate into better sales or at least a better rate of growth for Audi

Also a great result for Genesis, if they can add more relevant models to their line-up I think they could see a lot of growth in the next couple of years.

I think the survey is correct, the gap is closing between premium and non-premium brands which is good news for consumers.


TomMTomM - 7/27/2017 6:25:01 AM
+2 Boost
Actually- the rating for Jeep would be logical - it is one of the most recalled brands - and also among the least reliable. Not surprising coming from FCA. FCA should be prepared for the next car purchases where the buyers will be less likely to re-up for another Jeep.

As far as Genesis - I would think that brand is too new to have enough responses from actual owners to give a response I would be confident in - and again - much also depends on what these questions were.

As far as the "GAP" closing between premium and non-premium brands - THAT is also logical because the last breakout left us with fewer intermediate brands - making it CLEAR which brands are what - and people now are reducing expectations for true entry level vehicles because they don't expect things - and yet the brands often offer the high level options as well.




FirewombatFirewombat - 7/27/2017 9:35:47 AM
+2 Boost
Thanks Tom, I didn't say the rating for Jeep was illogical I said it was surprising :) And I think there were obviously enough responses from Genesis owners to justify a ranking so maybe just give credit where it's due. I also didn't say that the gap between premium and non-premium vehicles is illogical so not sure what your point is there but thank you. Might I add that I do find it amusing that YOU make use of CAPITAL letters to try and make a POINT, it adds a lot of nuance.


MDarringerMDarringer - 7/27/2017 9:19:45 AM
0 Boost
Actually this points out a flaw in JD Power's methodology. Of course Genesis should have brilliant customer satisfaction given the volume level of the brand. If Hyundai cannot keep such a small group of people happy then they are screwed. Conversely, the larger the car company the more likely they will not be at the top. The BS from JD Power simply says nothing of substance, but buyers have been duped into believing it.


vdivvdiv - 7/27/2017 11:21:11 AM
0 Boost
They are not listed because they refused to participate in the JDP APEAL survey (Tesla did not sell their customer data to third-party marketing, unlike all the makes listed here)


MDarringerMDarringer - 7/27/2017 11:43:15 AM
+4 Boost
What have they got to hide?


carloslassitercarloslassiter - 7/27/2017 11:52:30 AM
0 Boost
Proprietary information about their customers?


MDarringerMDarringer - 7/27/2017 12:16:22 PM
+4 Boost
No. Tesla is like Nazi Germany. Speaking against Der Fuhrer has dire consequences.


FirewombatFirewombat - 7/27/2017 3:21:19 PM
+1 Boost
You heard it here first folks


HolydudeHolydude - 8/3/2017 3:08:27 AM
+1 Boost
@Matt That statement is rather ironic coming from one who tolerates no dissent from his own point of view...


MDarringerMDarringer - 8/3/2017 8:53:49 AM
+1 Boost
You so DON'T understand the term "irony". Look up "facetious".


HolydudeHolydude - 8/3/2017 1:17:02 PM
+1 Boost
Ahh, pretending to be ironic when one's caught with his pants down, yes, i see the irony there indeed!


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC