Mazda Plans To Be The First To Market With A Compression Ignition Engine

Mazda Plans To Be The First To Market With A Compression Ignition Engine

Mazda Motor Corp. said it would become the world's first automaker to commercialize a gasoline engine using technology that deep-pocketed rivals have been trying to engineer for decades, a twist in an industry that is increasingly going electric.

The Japanese automaker, with an r&d budget a fraction of those of major peers, said in a statement Tuesday it plans to sell cars from 2019 with compression ignition engines -- a type of cleaner, more fuel efficient gasoline engine that has eluded the likes of Daimler AG and General Motors.


Read Article

MDarringerMDarringer - 8/8/2017 8:54:26 AM
-2 Boost
Yawn. I couldn't care less about Skycraptiv II.

This is so systemic of Mazda i.e. to waste money on engine technology when their vehicle lineup isn't exactly causing a stampede to dealers. They wasted money for years on the rotary and never made it viable. They wasted money on a 1.8 liter V6. Now this.


FirewombatFirewombat - 8/8/2017 9:52:17 AM
+3 Boost
Interesting, I like car companies that think and act more like engineering companies vs. just marketing vessels


MDarringerMDarringer - 8/8/2017 2:17:14 PM
+1 Boost
There is no point in doing engineering if it does not result in a product that generates sales. If sales are not generated, you have spent money on NOTHING.

The RX8 was fun, but an MX8 (piston version) would have easily sold more.

Mazda is heading for being an acquisition.


FirewombatFirewombat - 8/8/2017 2:54:23 PM
+1 Boost
Tell that to TVR


MDarringerMDarringer - 8/8/2017 4:36:13 PM
+1 Boost
@Firewombat You proved my point by that mention. TVR has almost always used other companies' engineering so as to make money given their sales volume and even then, they've had ups and downs. Their demise was exacerbated by engineering costs for the Speed 6 and then Speed 12 engines which drained capital when they could have just gone with GM's LS V8. Had they NOT decided to dump money into engineering engines, they may very well have been able to keep going. Thankfully Les Edgar is repurposing a LOT of engineering done elsewhere. All of the Gordon Murray technology already existed so designing a TVR had minimal cost. Similarly, the Coyote/Voodoo V8 is pretty much off-the-shelf from the Mustang. Cosworth's contributions were pretty much relegated to designing manifolds.



FirewombatFirewombat - 8/8/2017 6:50:40 PM
+2 Boost
I appreciate your response but that's a lot of detail to come to the conclusion that a company went down the drain even though it didn't do a lot of its own base engineering. So I still agree with you, no point going down the road of engineering a car, or borrowing engineering to build a car, if no one buys it or if it's constantly stuck in bankruptcy mode because the engineering, borrowed or not, is so bad it can't lure enough customers in.


TheSteveTheSteve - 8/8/2017 11:50:10 AM
+5 Boost

I truly wish them success, and I hope this new technology proves to have some *substantial* advantages without any drawbacks. Otherwise, it'll become a non-event, or more cynically, just another marketing gimmick.


TheSteveTheSteve - 8/9/2017 1:55:47 PM
+1 Boost
For interested parties, here's a video describing the new technology and explaining the real-world benefits, should it deliver as promised:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBkfOUaEcWM


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC