NHTSA Wants To REMOVE Any Barriers Keeping Self-driving OFF The Road — But WHY?

NHTSA Wants To REMOVE Any Barriers Keeping Self-driving OFF The Road — But WHY?
Perhaps I am a bit slow on the uptake regarding self-driving vehicles but this one is a bit of a concern for me. In recent months it seems that NHTSA is really pushing to get self-driving vehicles on the roads as soon as possible.

The difference now is that we're talking about self-driving cars that do not have human controls. 

Considering the technology is still quite nascent and we're talking about vehicles that weigh, I don't know, a ton or two, shouldn't we be a bit more keen on safety? According to this Reuters story, General Motors, Ford and Alphabet are lobbying to make this happen as swiftly as possible. 

Is that it though? Follow the money trail?

As someone who is certainly not an expert in self-driving autos, I want to hear what the Spies think of all this hubbub. Does this concern you? Or, do you feel the tech-enabled vehicles may actually be MORE safe on the road than those piloted by people?


The U.S. National Highway Traffic-Safety Administration said Friday it is looking for input on how it can remove regulatory roadblocks to self-driving cars.

The auto safety agency said in a report that it wants to find any “unnecessary regulatory barriers” to self-driving cars “particularly those that are not equipped with controls for a human driver.” 

The agency also wants comments on what research it needs to conduct before deciding whether to eliminate or rewrite regulations. But it could take the agency years to complete the research and finalize rule changes, and advocates are pushing Congress to act...

Read Article

TheSteveTheSteve - 10/28/2017 7:20:03 PM
+1 Boost
Who knows why a government agency (or administration) would choose to endanger its citizens? My cynical side *speculates* that they want to allow a lot of incidents to happen, due to today's not-ready-for-prime-time autonomous systems, and then when massive public outcry happens to stop the carnage, they'll implement overly restrictive laws that render autonomous cars unfeasible (motive: remove an advantage over the Big Three in Detroit). I stress that this is just wild speculation without evidence to support it.

This move could just be something as simple as being similar to this administration's crippling (already done) and dismantling (in progress) the EPA, the agency whose mandate is to protect the environment (Protection = the "P" in "EPA") and the people and living things in it. Who knows why they're doing that? To support Big Business at the price of The People?


TomMTomM - 10/29/2017 7:01:26 AM
0 Boost
I have said in the past - that eventually - cars will have the capability of being controlled from the outside of the car - by speed limit signs and similar.

This will be big in controlling accidents - since speed is that major factor in most deadly accidents. EVentually - these controls could simply PREVENT speeding - keep a "safe" distance between you and the car in front of you - allow for merging on major highways - enforcing stop and yield signs and MUCH more - but only if the cars are equipped to do that.

FAQMD - the problem is that the controls will NOT prevent a person from traveling - they will require the "CAR" to obey the laws - which is not supposed to be a "choice" and is perfectly legal. Everyone will go as fast as every other car - maintain safe distance - merge easily - stop and yield - accelerate at a specified rate - brake well in advance of these signs - and lots more. AND that will simply take all the FUN out of driving - making cars equivalent to Flatware - tools for transportation - and nothing more. WHy buy a Ferrari if you cannot accelerate any faster than the Old Yugo in front of you. YOU will not able to take turns at "excessive" speeds - no speeding. I would suspect the accident rate would really plummet - BUT of course - the downside - so would the FINES for MV violations. But ALL of this for the BENEFIT of the people! AND all perfectly legal.


t_bonet_bone - 10/29/2017 9:49:53 AM
+2 Boost
I think the money trail is related to the potential to keep sitting on our hands when it comes to road projects. The technology either allows more capacity at the same speed, or if that doesn't work people will be on their phones and not notice how much their commute sucks.

Anything but asphalt.


MorePowerMorePower - 10/29/2017 8:56:40 PM
+2 Boost
Answer is easy:

Car manufactures, hardware and software companies want to "test" software and hardware in real world situations.

These companies "promise" financial gains for "all" and governments say/said yes, because . . . you should have insurance anyway and they have more influence than the common person.


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC