In Terms Of Design ALONE, Did McLaren BLOW IT With The All-new Senna? Weigh In!

In Terms Of Design ALONE, Did McLaren BLOW IT With The All-new Senna? Weigh In!
There's nothing quite like a really well designed automobile. When a beautiful automobile is created it draws people in. 

Take, for example, the Alfa Romeo 8C. Largely considered one of the most gorgeous modern day automobiles, it is not known to be one of the best driver's cars. That doesn't mean it isn't highly collectible. People fall over themselves to put one in their garage. 

Needless to say, design is important. 

So when I saw McLaren's latest creation, which was penned by Robert Melville, I had to stop for a bit. Well, longer than that. I looked over the all-new McLaren Senna, which is named after one of the most legendary Formula 1 drivers to ever grace the circuit and I was left disappointed. 

And I hate to write it because Melville is a tremendously nice fellow, but the all-new Senna isn't so easy on the eyes. 

After riding alongside an MP4-12C about two weeks ago, having had the chance to experience a couple 570 models, sample the 650S and see the 720S in the flesh, the Senna is a remarkable miss. Although I understand that the Senna is a track-focused auto that will serve only one purpose — to go as fast as possible around a circuit — it is truly dreadful to look at. It reminds me of two things: 1) A Gumpert Apollo, which also serves the same purpose; and, 2) a LEGO car. 

I know there's some serious geekiness going on here to ensure the Senna is an outstanding vehicle but, boy, I've got to turn away. Make mine a 720S with some nifty MSO handiwork.

What say YOU, Spies? Did McLaren BLOW IT with the all-new Senna's design?


McLaren Senna
























































TheSteveTheSteve - 12/17/2017 10:12:09 PM
0 Boost
I find the exterior better looking than McLaren's recent "swishy" designs, but it's still "overdone." I like the styling of Koenigsegg's works, for example, as well as today's 911s (991.2 body). As for the interior, I prefer a much less overly-stylized, less touch-screen-centric, less video-game-dashboarded one.


cidflekkencidflekken - 12/17/2017 11:07:39 PM
-1 Boost
There's just too much going on, inside and out.


runninglogan1runninglogan1 - 12/18/2017 2:21:59 AM
+3 Boost
This design is all function over form. Have you seen a modern F1 car? Not pretty. But fast as hell. This thing will probably be untouchable on a track - where it's meant to live.


Agent00RAgent00R - 12/18/2017 8:41:34 AM
0 Boost
I made that point above...


Dexter1Dexter1 - 12/18/2017 6:57:50 AM
0 Boost
Not a fan of McLaren smiley-face designs. But the Senna has a purpose-built look I find attractive. The see-through doors are awesome!


MDarringerMDarringer - 12/18/2017 8:07:27 AM
-7 Boost
This is rolling excrement. It's trashy looking like a bad body kit on a Diamond Star Mitsubishi.


t_bonet_bone - 12/18/2017 10:00:03 AM
+1 Boost
This is styling. The original 1994 F1 probably had the best functional design including the downforce being efficiently generated at the bottom of the car...


zliveszlives - 12/18/2017 12:31:43 PM
+2 Boost
looks like a hyper car to me!! i mean if you want a daily driver i may choose another but if i want to own a race car... looks good to me.


qwertyfla1qwertyfla1 - 12/18/2017 5:11:23 PM
0 Boost
Two of the biggest sore losers and whiniest F1 drivers ever where Alain Prost and Ayrten Senna. I hated them both and I hate this car as the name brings up bad memories of my automotive nemesis which bears the badge and name of one of the best F1 drivers ever, gentlemen and super nice guy -Bruce Mclaren.

Name aside the design while for function is too busy and choppy for my liking but I sure wouldn't turn down some track time for shits and grins even if just riding shotgun.


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC