00R List His Top 007 BIGGEST Disappointments Of 2017 — WORST Rides Of The Year

00R List His Top 007 BIGGEST Disappointments Of 2017 — WORST Rides Of The Year

You know what they say. “With the good comes the bad.”

 

Well, they weren’t kidding. 

 

On January 1 I published my Top 007 favorite rides for 2017. Although I know people are interested in that, something tells me there’s greater interest in the vehicles I didn’t like throughout the past 12 months.

 

Having said that, let’s not delay any further. To the list we go.

 

Note: This list only consists of vehicles I piloted in 2017. If I didn’t drive it, it was not considered.

 


 

1. Volkswagen Atlas. The all-new, seven-seat Volkswagen Atlas is the marque’s foray into the three-row world. I’ve given it the nickname “Atlast,” because the company finally is meeting the market need. Having been the owner of a 2004 Touareg, I have very high expectations for a VW sport-utility vehicle. Although the Atlas undoubtedly delivers space at a relatively aggressive price, I was really let down with a couple things related to the Atlas. First, this monster SUV cannot take bumps and its ride quality is abysmal. Were VW’s engineers asleep on this one? I was hoping for something on par with the Touareg, which had a more isolated experience over potholes. Working my way around Manhattan, passengers told me without any prompting “This car can’t handle bumps.” Secondly, VW used to produce fairly nice interiors for the money. Those days are long gone. Everything, top-to-bottom, was discount grade — similar quality as General Motors. Aside from that, the SUV drove OK and the six-cylinder engine was more than adequate. 

 


 

2. Ford Mustang Shelby GT350. I am donning my flame-retardant clothing for this one. My first experience with the GT350 was on the track and I had a good time with it given the limited seat time. The car felt special. Well, in this case what happened at the track stayed at the track. Driving this vehicle on public roads was, frankly, terrible. While the suspension was predictably not so great, what really stands out is its high-revving V8 motor. On the open road or on a track you can really exercise this vehicle and have a blast. But below 4,000 revs this engine is a dog and when you’re puttering around town or commuting, it just feels lazy. The steering is another low point with its rather meandering feel — changing the modes only makes it worse. While I was impatiently waiting for my BMW M2 to go into production earlier in 2017 I almost switched my order for a GT350. After spending a week with one I am SO glad I did not make that mistake. If you have access to country roads and a track, by all means go ahead. 


 

3. Mercedes-AMG GLE43 Coupe. This is the three-pointed star that’s clearly taking some creative license from the BMW X6. Now when I first listened to My Chemical Romance’s third studio album I just thought “Boy, this sounds like Queen.” Why listen to the knock off when I can dial up the real deal with the originals — Freddie Mercury and Brian May — that do it much better? That’s how I feel here. Even though the GLE43 makes use of a six-cylinder that produces 362 horsepower (MY 2017) it feels underpowered. Carving corners in the San Francisco Bay Area it was OK but it just didn’t feel as composed when compared to what I’ve experienced in the Bavarian. While I did like the Sport mode, which leaves you with a crackling exhaust note on the overrun, it just isn’t enough to swoon me. At the end of the day its just too damn big and bloated to feel like an AMG product. The 63 variant is an entirely different story because it has the right motor. Last, but not least, the GLE43 Coupe is very expensive and to be straightforward this is not how I’d spend my hard-earned bucks. Its base price is around $70,000 and that doesn’t even include leather. Essentially, you’re looking at nearly $90,000 for a well-equipped AMG that isn’t really an AMG. 


 

4. Ford F-150 Raptor. I’ll be the first to admit I am not a truck guy; however, I’ve been jonesing to get behind the wheel of the all-new Raptor since I first set eyes on it. Simply put, it’s the best looking truck ever made. There’s just one problem: I took delivery of the smaller two-door model. Though I cackled and howled for the first two days as I drove the truck during my daily routine, that ended soon. That’s because the short wheelbase Raptor really bounces around due to the super stiff suspension. At high speed its not uncommon to lose traction at the front wheels, which is particularly unsettling. While I understand the reason why Ford equipped this vehicle with the EcoBoost motor, it just doesn’t make the right sounds for me. Whatever Ford did to the GT to make the EcoBoost sound amazing needs to be applied here. In addition, Ford should really consider reengineering the rear doors. Over each and every bump they rattle, which reminds me of riding in a 1980s conversion van. Long story short, in 2018 I really want to see if I can get my hands on a SuperCrew. With proper doors and a longer wheelbase, I think it would add up to a much better Raptor. Avoid the two-door variant. 

 


 

5. Cadillac XT5. OK, so there’s no question that the XT5 was a nice step forward from the SRX. The revamped interior is a nice touch; however, let’s be real here: General Motors just applied lipstick to a last-gen Equinox pig. Even though the XT5’s interior improves upon the SRX, when you look at the competition — Lexus RX, all-new BMW X3, Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class and Audi Q5 — it is left in the dust. To keep this short, the XT5 is just a dated revamp that is below par across just about every metric except how quiet the cabin is kept at cruising speed. Given the strides seen with the CT6’s cabin, which still could use some work, I am looking forward to seeing Cadillac’s replacement for the XT5. I hope it is sooner rather than later as the competition continues to get stronger and the XT5 is left dangling in the wind. 


 

6. BMW X4 M40i. Although many said the X6 wasn’t going to be a sales success, it clearly opened up an all-new niche in the sport-utility vehicle segment. The X4 is the X6’s little sibling, however, it just cannot pull off the look with the same sleek attitude. It has a bulbous greenhouse and, frankly, it really hurts the vehicle’s design. It’s not good — at all. While its motor and overall driving experience is quite good, the cockpit is extremely dated. Ultimately, I feel the M40i’s engine should have been dropped into the same-gen X3 but BMW must have thought it was a better idea to hold it over until the all-new X3 was released. Now you can get the all-new X3 M40i, which will give you the updated technology that was lacking in the X4 I drove. That’s the move, folks. Simply put, the X4 M40i is not worth ~$63,000 when equipped even as a poor man’s Porsche Macan. 


 

7. Lexus IS200t. So, Lexus finally put the right motor in this vehicle that works all around. There’s just  one major issue with the IS: This vehicle does not stand a chance against the competition. Its interior is way too small whether you’re in front or in the back. In addition, there’s noting about it that really screams premium. Let’s say you do find it comfortable though and you start exploring the infotainment system, I guarantee that frustration will ensue. That’s because this Lexus’ user experience is really, really poor. It’s so bad, in fact, that one of my doctors told me she sold her one-year-old GS because she simply couldn’t deal with the clunky software and her inability to create preset radio stations. Considering how amazing Lexus’ latest all-new vehicles are — this includes the LC, LS and RX — this has to trickle down into the IS. 



MDarringerMDarringer - 1/8/2018 8:55:13 AM
-7 Boost
For the the bottom 7 that I drove this year were:

1. Volvo XC90 / It's terribly unrefined for wanting to run with Mercedes and BMW. The turbo is horrible.

2. VW Atlas / This would have been a game changer in 2005, but it's 13 years late to market and doesn't feel up to date. The Ford Explorer is much better and it's old and on and old Volvo platform. Factor in that when comparably equipped the Atlas is a lot more expensive and it's a deal breaker. It drives like VW has no clue that there is competition.

3. Alfa Romeo Giulia / The first arrivals needed assembly glitches fixed. How is that even possible? Then there are the notorious breakdowns that are STILL happening despite the supposed fix that made everything perfect. Couple that with the boring, cliched body styling (3 Series, Infiniti, Mazda) with gaping vajayjay face and it's a no. The one I sampled broke down twice in one week which is three times too many.

4. Jeep Compass / It's great looking and you want to to drive well, but something's just "off" not in a big way that you would immediately reject it, but nagging enough that you will come to hate it after you've bought it. The transmission never seems happy and the engine seems to huff and puff.

5. Ford Fusion / The update was botched. The styling wasn't different enough to be noticed, but this is a case of a good car standing still when it needed to leap out ahead. My one peeve is that they converted the start to a button--nothing wrong there--so that you don't need the key, but to lock the car you must use the key fob because they did not incorporate the touch lock/unlock feature as found on other Fords.

6. Mitsubishi Mirage / Guess what I had the misfortune of driving as a rental when the piece of intestinal purge Giulia stranded me? The Mirage is a horrible car in every conceivable way. The Chevy Spark by contrast is infinitely better for not much more money. This car sells solely on 84 month financing.

7. Lincoln MKZ / So the ugly face of the MKZ went away and was replaced with something attractive, but the ugly tail still remained. The one I drove was the turbo V6 and it's the case of a great engine slapped into a car not designed for it. Sure, it feels fast but it doesn't inspire confidence. It drives like something's not quite right The Continental is slightly better, but even it shows that it was hastily created.




Agent00RAgent00R - 1/8/2018 7:01:36 PM
+2 Boost
Hey there, Matt.

My .02 cents.

The XC90 is a great SUV; however, the NVH in regards to the motor is very unrefined.

The Giulia I was supposed to drive wound up never showing up. I wonder why...

Digging your other observations.




MDarringerMDarringer - 1/8/2018 8:32:50 PM
+1 Boost
@00R The standard Mustang GT will be better for most people. I love my GT350, but I also don't live in roads with craters as normal.


mre30mre30 - 1/8/2018 9:29:55 AM
+1 Boost
I am not in the car biz, so my list is not so exhaustive, but I was shopping for a new SUV this year.

Overall comment - is it me, or are we entering a "post-excitement" phase of the car universe? New products, to me, just seem to rehashed and/or warmed over updates of what they replaced. There is a lack of truly revolutionary products and when they are fresh and new on the surface (Volvo XC90 case in point) there is some terrible, deal-killing attribute that just ruins the party.

Observations -

(a) Cadillac XT5 - mediocre and Equniox-like

(b) Maserati Levante - huh? Aside from various flaws, the cargo area is as high as the rear parcel shelves on some sedans - you have to virtually lift stuff over your head to put it in there!

(c) Volvo XC90 - wanted to love it and buy it, but test drive put a damper on that.

(d) Land Rover Discovery - odd tailgate aside, powertrain mediocrity and the fact that 2nd row seats are about 3 inches off the floor killed that deal. Six months out - serious quality issues are surfacing in internet chat rooms (windshield leaks).

(e) Jaguar F-Pace - powertrain mediocrity and bargain basement interior.

(f) Other domestic SUV's - too old in the product cycle to consider.

Since I didn't want something as big as the Mercedes GL, it is down to the X5 or the Q7 - which one should I get?

On paper its the Q7 but I worry about Audi quality.

However, if I get the X5 I can get BMW South Carolina "Performance Center" delivery and take an "M" driving course while I'm there!



Like I said, I think there is really nothing exceptional on offer now.


Agent00RAgent00R - 1/8/2018 7:07:39 PM
0 Boost
Hey there, @mre30.

Adding some comments here.

What didn't you like about the XC90? Same NVH issues I've noted? Something else? Curious...

F-Pace was a truly sad when I drove it in 2016. Awful interior but I actually liked the motor. The ride was quite hard but there was so much body roll in corners.

Personally, I'd go X5 I think. Tough call between that and the Q7.


mre30mre30 - 1/8/2018 8:59:04 PM
+1 Boost
Hi there!

XC90 had NVH issues, I also thought it had a "flinty" feel to it - hard to put my finger on but combo of fragile, brittle, with a little coarseness thrown in.

I think its going to be an X5 - that I6 Turbo might be one of the best mainstream engines on the market!


MDarringerMDarringer - 1/8/2018 9:10:44 PM
0 Boost
The XT5 essentially IS an Equinox and I agree that it's not as compelling as it should be.
The Levante is a Maserati Magnum. I think it's nearly as despicable as the Giulia for being a mediocre design.


Agent00RAgent00R - 1/8/2018 11:32:39 PM
+1 Boost
@mre30 — shot you an email regarding the X5.


carsnyccarsnyc - 1/8/2018 1:58:18 PM
+1 Boost
I would scratch the Raptor and IS from this list.


cidflekkencidflekken - 1/9/2018 2:37:41 AM
+1 Boost
All I know is I can't wait for my friend's Trackhawk to get here this week. I'm really having a hard time fathoming 707hp in an SUV but will let you know after my drive!


dumpstydumpsty - 1/10/2018 1:39:22 PM
+1 Boost
Atlas - Yess! Its about time - very late to the game. VW clearly has not been able to read the US market well concerning SUV/CUVs. VW wants to offer something but doesn't want to take biz away from Audi/Porsche/etc which get much higher profit per vehicle.

GLE43 Coupe - I like it...just b/c. I owned an Infiniti FX45 ten years ago. It was not practical but was loaded & tons of fun to drive in all kinds of weather conditions. Fit 4 people comfortably + some gear which was plenty useful for me. I could live with the AWD TT-V6 - I don't need to be the fastest on the hood. Much like the FX45 there aren't many around - so I had gawkers all the time. That sticker price tho - that ain't cool.

XT5 - I like it for what it is & for what it isn't. OK, its a redesigned SRX - cool. It didn't get too big & has much better exterior proportions. Doesn't look like a JDM comic book jelly bean (see Lexus RX). Classy, upscale interior...especially the driver instrument cluster & center stack...the . Maybe the feel of the leather isn't up to par with M-B/BMW...so much of an issue. The overall vehicle is really nice & not a comical overstatement. I would get the lowest trim however - stick to the loaded Premium & V-sport trims if available.

IS200t - This model & trim was made for people who wanted to step into the luxury brand but not spend too much coin on a larger better equipped model. It's upscale...barely. I recently rented a Jaguar XE 25t - its a smaller car with a peppy turbo-I4. Entering & existing was a yoga exercise, while the overall driving experience was just OK. It didn't have a reverse camera - what?! It wasn't the top trim so didn't hate it too much knowing it could get much better.




dumpstydumpsty - 1/10/2018 1:43:46 PM
+1 Boost
...especially the driver instrument cluster & center stack...the big sunroof all look great.

Maybe the feel of the leather isn't up to par with M-B/BMW...NOT so much of an issue..

I would NOT get the lowest trim...


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC