Why Bother? Chevrolet Debuts Turbocharged 4 Cylinder Silverado - Gains 2 MPG Over V8

Why Bother? Chevrolet Debuts Turbocharged 4 Cylinder Silverado - Gains 2 MPG Over V8
The 2019 Chevrolet Silverado with a new four-cylinder engine will achieve an EPA-estimated 21 mpg combined, or 20 city/23 highway.

The ratings, for rear-wheel-drive models, are not much better than the fuel economy of the redesigned pickup's 5.3-liter V-8 engine, which offers 19 mpg combined (17 city/23 highway), according to the EPA's website.


Read Article

jeffgalljeffgall - 10/10/2018 11:44:16 AM
+2 Boost
That’s a 9.5% savings in fuel consumption (15% in city only consumption). Multiply that by dozens, if not hundreds, in a fleet and that is a business savings that helps the bottom line.


TheSteveTheSteve - 10/10/2018 1:19:19 PM
+1 Boost
Jeffgall: Kudos to you for doing the math in comparing the fuel CONSUMED, rather than just looking at a small “2” or “3” difference in MPG, and incorrectly concluding it’s insignificant.

Combined (9.5% savings)
19 MPG = 5.26 gallons/100 miles (baseline)
21 MPG = 4.76 gallons/100 miles

City (15% savings)
17 MPG = 5.88 gallons/100 miles (baseline)
20 MPG = 5.00 gallons/100 miles


zliveszlives - 10/11/2018 7:54:28 PM
+2 Boost
I went from a V8 f150 to a turbo6 Ecoboost... no gain in real world driving at all. i expect these numbers to also be non real world. VW is not the only one playing games with MPG


MDarringerMDarringer - 10/11/2018 8:13:52 PM
0 Boost
The Ecoboost Fusion gets the same or LOWER real world MPG as the old 2.5 4.


templar19dtemplar19d - 10/10/2018 11:58:00 AM
+2 Boost
does it require 93 octane vs. 87 for the V8? Ifso doesn't that equate to higher running costs?.....


TomMTomM - 10/10/2018 2:12:47 PM
+2 Boost
GM Blew it on this one

IF the 4 cylinder had come in quite a bit better in mileage than this - they might have had a case for it - BUT - at these numbers - it was not worth the trouble - that engine belongs in a Colorado - and I believe that is where it will end up


trboaccordtrboaccord - 10/10/2018 3:55:13 PM
+1 Boost
I can see these engines having problems down the road hence why Ford is using a V6 to turbocharge NOT a 4 cylinder as you have to really really work that 4 cylinder and in a truck that's a lot of working it needs to do. Mind you this is all besides the fact that GM cant make anything reliable.


TomMTomM - 10/11/2018 7:23:39 AM
+1 Boost
Nonsense - GM has made LOTS of auto parts that are so reliable that they have been used in high end exotic and luxury cars around the world - among them Rolls Royce - Bentley - Mercedes - and BMW.

And GM full size pick up trucks are also at the head of the list of longest lasting vehicles on the road.

THe problem with the 4 Cylinder is perception - people assume 4 cylinder engines to be "smaller" and will have to work harder - yet they have used 4 cylinder Diesel engines for decades without such complaints. This is not a "small" engine and likely will last a long time. The problem here is that the 4 cylinder does not offer higher fuel mileage over older designs of larger engines.




MDarringerMDarringer - 10/11/2018 8:26:47 AM
+1 Boost
The engine failures will be epic on this one if the truck is used regularly for hauling or towing. The little engine will be huffing and puffing 24-7.


skytopskytop - 10/12/2018 12:12:51 PM
+1 Boost
I won't notice the little 4 cylinder banger when descending long, steep hills.


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC