Cadillac Launches The First Of A New Generation Of Sedans With CT5

Cadillac Launches The First Of A New Generation Of Sedans With CT5
Cadillac today revealed its first-ever CT5 sedan with a social media campaign designed to stimulate the senses using autonomous sensory meridian response, also known as ASMR.

The videos focus on distinct sounds designed to trigger a physical response,­­ often experienced as a spine-tingling sensation, such as the rev of the CT5’s available 3.0L Twin Turbo engine, audio from its Bose® Performance Series speakers and the whisper of its custom black-and-white camouflage wrap slowly being peeled away to reveal the new sedan’s exterior.

The CT5 “Sensory Symphony” series can be found on Cadillac’s YouTube page and social media channels.

“The Cadillac CT5 is meant to overwhelm all of the senses, and that’s why we’re using ASMR-style videos to showcase its features,” said Deborah Wahl, Cadillac chief marketing officer. “The ‘Sensory Symphony’ videos are designed to convey for viewers the same satisfying feeling that arises from driving this car.”

Cadillac collaborated with artist Darel Carey to create a one-of-a-kind camouflage wrap for the CT5. The black and white tape patterns reflect forms found in nature and distort the viewer’s perception of space, and the videos will leverage this effect to disguise the shape of the vehicle. In the videos the camouflage is slowly peeled back to trigger the ASMR sensation while revealing the first-ever CT5.

The brand will feature a new video each week leading up to the New York Auto Show, where the CT5 will make its public debut, culminating in a “Sensory Symphony” video of vehicle sounds on April 16.

“Sound leaves a lasting impression, and that’s why it is such a focus for this vehicle,” said Brandon Vivian, Cadillac executive chief engineer. “With standard sound optimization and active noise cancellation, our goal is to deliver a world-class cabin experience with a Cadillac-exclusive curated sound library.”

CT5 showcases Cadillac’s unique expertise in crafting American performance sedans, with details designed to elevate every drive. Built on an evolution of Cadillac’s award-wining RWD/AWD Alpha architecture, the CT5 features a standard 2.0L Turbo and available 3.0L Twin-Turbo engine with unique sound calibrations, each paired to a standard 10-speed automatic transmission offering nearly imperceptible shifts.

The driver-centric cockpit inside the CT5 blends high tech and high touch for an exceptional blend of control tactility. The new sedan will be offered in Luxury and Sport models, giving customers more choices in appearance and ride character.

The CT5 will be built at GM’s Lansing Grand River facility, which received an investment of $211 million to build the next-generation Cadillac sedan, and will make its public debut in April at the New York International Auto Show.





countguycountguy - 3/18/2019 10:14:59 AM
+8 Boost
Wow, holy side rip off of the honda accord Batman.


dlindlin - 3/18/2019 10:22:50 AM
+9 Boost
Overall I like this car, but the copy of C pillar kink is... pathetic


xjug1987axjug1987a - 3/18/2019 11:03:41 AM
0 Boost
I think it looks pretty clean... though I do see alittle Genesis in it. It clearly represents the Escala but why not the lift back? Suppose in typical GM style they'll come out with a more expensive model with a liftback? It would have been terrific packaging if the trunk were a lift...

The "kink" is such a weak attempt to be different all the while copying Infiniti and BMW... I like it though, over all its a nice next Gen sedan. Is this the replacment for the CTS or ATS?


PUGPROUDPUGPROUD - 3/18/2019 11:41:08 AM
+3 Boost
Cadillac has lost its way and cannot find its way back. Who is running this division...o yea it depends on which year it is. Sad downward spiral of a once proud brand.


NewQNewQ - 3/18/2019 11:45:52 AM
+5 Boost
It looks nice. I think this is roughly 3-Series sized.

They way they did the C-pillar portion of the green house and the quasi-fastback makes the rear end look kind of hiked-up. That causes the whole profile to seem a little tall of its length, which ultimately leads to the proportions looking smooshed.

I hope to God that interior isn't shit. Not holding my breath though.


TomMTomM - 3/18/2019 1:19:31 PM
+3 Boost
Actually - this is sized much like the current CTS.

WHat is happening - is that Cadillac is returning to its initial Arts and science plan - by Offering a car slightly larger than others in the class. The current CTS actually competed with the E-class - Now the CT6 will compete in that "PRICE" range - actually larger than the others in that class.

The CT5 will be closer to the E-class in interior size - but will compete in Price with the 3 -series and the ATS replacement - the CT4 will compete with the CLA class - but is rear wheel drive too.

It was something that I and others here recommended when they came out with the last generation - because the cars consistently came in at the low end of the class in size.

It was time for a move on from the Arts and Science styling that was now too old


NewQNewQ - 3/18/2019 1:55:41 PM
+3 Boost
Yes, you're right. It's a 5-Series competitor.

I'm not sure how I feel about it in comparison to the 5 though. I think it works a little bit better, and doesn't seem as staid as the BMW. It could use more dash-axel ratio though, but I like how short the front overhang is.

That rear door shape is going to be weird. But at least it got rid of that plastic triangle on the CT6, which Audi also uses as well.


NewQNewQ - 3/18/2019 2:05:22 PM
+4 Boost
Also, I'm still a little concerned with the "price lower/size higher" strategy.

You can frame it as "priced like a 3, sized like a 5", but what it really amounts to is a mid-size entry, but on the cheap.

It's that last part that worries me. I have no problem with being competitive on price, but I'm concerned this strategy will perpetuate and shoehorn Cadillac in to the "budget luxury" mindset even further. Cadillac needs to desperately get away from that stigma.

Maybe I'm in the minority across car buyers, but pricing is a secondary indicator of quality for me. If I see an option that's significantly cheaper than its competitors, might first thought is "why, what's wrong with it?" And with a brand like Cadillac, who's image is already one of cutting corners and lower quality, that's a bad way to start an engagement with a customer. You don't want to be saddled as the go-to brand for people who couldn't afford the "good stuff".

Of course, if this new model truly is competitive with the 5/E/A6, it'll be a fantastic option. But, even the smallest ground ceded to the Germans on perceived quality, interior design, power, etc., will immediately be mentally paired with the lower price, and the conclusion will be reached "well, it's the budget option in this class".

I know it's not a logical way to think, and I try actively to catch myself when I do; and maybe most people aren't thinking that way when they buy a car in this segment.

If they're going back to a "tweener" route in terms of size, that's certainly an interesting strategy, but I have concerns it will confuse customers. Maybe not, but people are used to 3/5/7, C/E/S, 4/6/8, IS/GS/LS, XE/XF/XJ, so forth and so on.


TruthyTruthy - 3/18/2019 2:49:10 PM
+3 Boost
NewQ, you are spot on. This seems like a bit of a surrender from competing head-on with the top guys. Luxury shoppers are not looking for a bargain, but for the latest and best.


TomMTomM - 3/19/2019 5:52:40 AM
+2 Boost
I disagree

I still believe that most of the problem with Sedans in the USA is that the manufacturers have been trying to force their European sized cars down the throats of the Larger American Drivers. AS a result - we have compact cars that cannot Have a 6" driver and room enough for a passenger BEHIND that driver who has legs. Traditionally, AMerican cars always had MORE ROOM in the cars - and more room IS the symbol of Luxury. Many of the Fords were simply too small - 2 seaters with a luggage rack in the back size. When Chevy reduced the size of the Malibu to Euro Spec it stopped Selling - and sales only returned when they made it bigger again. Chrysler had the same problem with the 200 - too small for the class.

What I do not like - in any of the cars now based on the Escala - is the FASTBACK roof design - and especially the HATCHBACK of the Escala itself. Hatchback looking cars belong in the entry level - and REAL luxury cars should have a far more vertical Rear Window - and a proper trunk that can fit all the golf bags for the occupants in the car. While it does leave open a restyle just by changing the Roof - which has been done in the Past. THe fact is - Cadillac does not need to mimic another cars styling - but certainly not that of the VW Golf. Go back to Rolls/Bentley


MDarringerMDarringer - 3/19/2019 8:13:26 AM
+2 Boost
@Truthy NO: "Luxury shoppers are not looking for a bargain, but for the latest and best." Market research says you're dead wrong. Given how they ping pong back and forth between BMW, Audi, Mercedes, and Lexus over which has the cheapest lease, they are looking for a bargain. The percent of premium vehicles that are leased is high and brand loyalty at an all-time low. Cadillac will have a terrible time because it has no panache but is trying to get Mercedes prices. If this CT5 were a $32K base vehicle and fully optioned at $40K it might have a chance because it would be a bargain, but as it is, no one is going to pay Mercedes E Class prices for a Cruze hatchback looking alphanumeric piece of vomit.


TruthyTruthy - 3/19/2019 10:19:50 AM
+2 Boost
MD, I appreciate your comment and I think you are spot on. When the current CTS was introduced Cadillc claimed it was a competitor for the 5, E, and would price accordingly. I thought was a bad idea as you have to earn your way. If they had an equal quality car for 10 percent less they would have had success. As it is they had at best a 85 - 90 percent car at price parity.
Just having a bigger car for the same money may not work either.
Have a good day, sir (notice the correct punctuation).


NewQNewQ - 3/20/2019 4:55:17 PM
+1 Boost
If the product isn't good enough, then it doesn't matter how you price it, it will always be seen as a cheap alternative. It just becomes a question as to whether the manufacturer is trying to chase that market, or they're too stupid to lower their prices.

Product always comes first; always always always.

If your product is on par, then you have to play it carefully on pricing. Not too high, not too low.

Once the customer chooses respects the brand, they want to buy the product. Naturally they want the best price, but that's only once they respect the brand enough to buy it. Chasing cheap leases might be common at the low-end of the market (CLAs, A3s, stripped-out 320s, etc.). But the higher you go, the more the product quality becomes important.

I think Cadillac needs to price their vehicles according to their quality. If their product really is as good as the Germans or Lexus (unlikely), they should price it the same. If the car is truly competitive, but they price it far lower, that speaks to chasing the budget market. Not a good look.

Cadillac needs to get away from "budget" "discount" "cheap" "good deal", all of that. That's what's hammered them in to the ground for 35 years. That means good product, first and foremost. If you don't have that, forget everything else. If you have good product, have the confidence to price it accordingly. A price too low not only chases the budget market, as mentioned above, but also projects weakness and timidness, antithetical to courting the luxury buyer.


Vette71Vette71 - 3/18/2019 12:18:42 PM
+3 Boost
Harvey Earl and Bill Mitchell have to be rolling over in their graves.


TruthyTruthy - 3/18/2019 1:50:30 PM
+1 Boost
True. They had a 1959 Cadillac ElDorado convertible at the Chicago auto show. Everyone at the Cadillac stand was looking at this and not the new cars on display. Will any of these designs still draw crowds in 60 years?


HoustonMidtownHoustonMidtown - 3/18/2019 12:35:36 PM
+7 Boost
The huge chuck of black plastic meant to represent the extension of the window in the C pillar is horrible


dlindlin - 3/18/2019 1:12:08 PM
+1 Boost
Agreed if it's plastic, but photo of the front 3/4 view seems to suggest it's glass


HoustonMidtownHoustonMidtown - 3/18/2019 3:27:06 PM
+2 Boost
https://www.roadandtrack.com/new-cars/future-cars/a26854029/2020-cadillac-ct5-reveal-photos-specs/


Agent00JAgent00J - 3/18/2019 12:53:15 PM
-1 Boost
I like the changes Nissan did to the Altima...

-00J


TruthyTruthy - 3/18/2019 1:12:42 PM
+2 Boost
I did not like this C-Pillar treatment on the Accord. It does no look good here either. I hope the interior is much better.


garysandiegogarysandiego - 3/18/2019 2:42:07 PM
+2 Boost
So, they rebadged a Nissan?

Snark aside, the front is nice and is clearly a Cadillac, the back is OK although tails at the top of the rear lights are odd. I fear the profile is not high class. If the interior is a knock-out, the profile may be overlooked.


ricks0mericks0me - 3/18/2019 4:24:57 PM
+1 Boost
Truthy said: They had a 1959 Cadillac ElDorado convertible at the Chicago auto show. Everyone at the Cadillac stand was looking at this and not the new cars on display. Will any of these designs still draw crowds in 60 years?

Rick said: 100% correct. These bozo's are looking at the answer and it's not the CT5. I have always stated that a Cadillac is big & bold with no apologies made. Escalade is big & bold. Everything else they have is 1 big yawn.


TruthyTruthy - 3/18/2019 4:34:35 PM
+2 Boost
Rick is right. And the Escalade has a name, not an alphanumeric nonsense. And Cadillac needs a class in managing expectations. The Ciel was a beautiful concept. Bold, powerful v-8. The next few concepts were good. Then the CT6 with bland styling, retro in a bad way interior with a turbo 4?? Then the Escala offer hope again, but this could be an updated previous generation Cruze?
My two adult children accompanied me to the Chicago auto show and had no interest in Cadillac. "They look like Chevys." Not a good sign.


bmw7erbmw7er - 3/18/2019 4:57:51 PM
+4 Boost
Another 4 door coupe design. Problem is, this one is really ugly.


bmw7erbmw7er - 3/18/2019 4:58:54 PM
+4 Boost
Another 4 door coupe design. Problem is, this one is really ugly. The amount of bulk from the rear tires back is waaaaaay too heavy.


cidflekkencidflekken - 3/18/2019 6:14:56 PM
+2 Boost
From the attractive Escala, we get THIS?? Looks like an Asian product now and not an original one. Actually kind of embarrassed for Cadillac as they've stripped out any form of identity they had in their design language.


MDarringerMDarringer - 3/18/2019 8:33:41 PM
-1 Boost
This is terrible. Cue the free leases.


jtz7jtz7 - 3/18/2019 11:49:22 PM
+3 Boost
So I see we are going to act like this design is orginal huh?

Side profile is Acura TL, Lexus ES, but because it isn't Korean, people rather play dumb as if it is original.


jtz7jtz7 - 3/18/2019 11:52:06 PM
+3 Boost
No one is going to mention Mazda's signature headlights huh? If it was a Genesis that's what would had been said. Also the side profile looks like it copied the Maxda 6.


TomMTomM - 3/19/2019 5:57:03 AM
+4 Boost
Forgot ONE big thing

It is now time for Manufacturers to follow the lead of Lincoln and get back to NAMING their cars.

MAYBE using Alphanumeric Gobbledygook worked in simpler times.
I doubt people really know the current mess of Letters and numbers they get everytime that 2 year old spreads the blocks on the floor.

ANd if that is not bad enough - now how about the use of N/m Torque classes by GM for engines - do any of them have brains - hard to believe.


MDarringerMDarringer - 3/19/2019 8:08:10 AM
-1 Boost
The ONLY reason that alphanumeric names happened is because Mercedes and BMW used them a half century ago and the wannabe premiums followed suit. Audi was the first to botch it in the USA with the 100/Fox which they gave up for 4000/5000 which they gave up for 80/90/100/200/V8 which they gave up for A12345678.

The Cadillac Seville and Eldorado were something, but the CT5 and CT6 mean nothing. So of course let's double down with CT6400....


TruthyTruthy - 3/19/2019 10:30:45 AM
+2 Boost
The alphanumerics worked for MB and BMW as the brand itself was identifying and they had considerably fewer models. Woth model proliferation it gets confusing. And Cadillac and Infiniti go even further by changing their scheme frequently.
Torque? Really>


TruthyTruthy - 3/19/2019 10:25:41 AM
+4 Boost
The profile, especially the back half, looks like the 2010 Infiniti M35.


cidflekkencidflekken - 3/19/2019 11:37:24 AM
+4 Boost
Yes


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC