BMW’s V5 for 2009?

BMW’s V5 for 2009?
The production version of the BMW Space Functional Concept will be called either the V5 or V6, followed by a more compact BMW V3 model.

The estimated price is between $45,000-$55,000. This is not a traditional minivan with sliding doors, rather a tall wagon or as they call it "sports tourer".

The future monovolume sport of the Bavarian house,is destined to rival with Mercedes R- Class.

The V5 is going to weigh more because it will be large (expect 4600-4800 lbs - the Merc is something like 4900+).

The BMW V5 will be also a frightening competitor of all the currently available MPV models on the market such as the Chrysler Voyager or Renault Espace.

The V5 will be for those customers that prioritize maximizing space and driving dynamics over off road "sytle" but can’t cary their family into a 5-series or E320 wagon.



Full 2006 SEMA Auto Show Gallery link

2006 SEMA Auto Show Photo Gallery

We've also added more photos to our Paris to Bejing rally photo gallery so be sure to check them out!

Mercedes-Benz Paris to Bejing Photo Gallery

More photos in our show photo galleries...

AutoSpies.com Photo Galleries


Read Article

BMW_DRVRBMW_DRVR - 11/10/2006 1:01:42 PM
-4 Boost
If it looks like that, i will definately buy one.


answeranswer - 11/10/2006 2:09:09 PM
+1 Boost
Nobody wanted a Chrysler Pacifica. Nobody is wanting the R Class. Why does BMW feel a need to do this one?


EL34iEL34i - 11/10/2006 2:47:05 PM
-7 Boost
I could hold so many clients in one of these vehicles. If built, you know Lexus would rush to the market, an Avalon-based version.


rockerrocker - 11/10/2006 2:48:14 PM
+1 Boost
I agree. People seem to want a car, a SUV(crossover or truck based) or a truck. The Rclass is much better than the Pacifica though. The Paacifica has a very bloated look about it.


rockerrocker - 11/10/2006 2:48:14 PM
-1 Boost
I agree. People seem to want a car, a SUV(crossover or truck based) or a truck. The Rclass is much better than the Pacifica though. The Paacifica has a very bloated look about it.


rockerrocker - 11/10/2006 2:48:49 PM
-1 Boost
But this one does look nice.


S4cabriofoxS4cabriofox - 11/10/2006 11:35:55 PM
+1 Boost
"Nice to see everyone following the grand-daddy of the crossovers, the RX. What happened to exclusivity and being independent?"

This isn't exactly in the RX's class. The RX is more of an X5 competitor- similar size, price and engine.

This is an R-Class competitor, though, and I hate it.


S4cabriofoxS4cabriofox - 11/10/2006 11:35:10 PM
+1 Boost
I hope not!

I said this before and I'll say it again... BMW is the anti-Mercedes! The R-Class has given Mercedes a bad name-- HAS BMW NOT NOTICED? No minivans! I'm starting a petition!

This is hideous, BMW_FAN. If it was a Lexus, you would not buy it, even if it had the same performance characteristics. Even if it looks better than this, it will be a sad day for BMW when it comes out.


AmazingBimmerAmazingBimmer - 11/11/2006 12:40:37 AM
+2 Boost
s4.. of coourse you hate it.. but then. you like audis, so your taste and pedigree is seriously suspect.


S4cabriofoxS4cabriofox - 11/11/2006 5:19:43 PM
+1 Boost
Notice how almost all the other BMW fans think it is a stupid idea.

I can't believe you don't agree.

You actually want BMW to produce this monstrosity?

I like Audis AND BMWs, FYI- I just don't like some of the BMW drivers, like yourself. I am going to get a 3 Series coupe or 5 Series for my next winter car, and there's even a possibility of a 650ci replacing my S4, but I may shell out for something like a 911 instead.


528i528i - 11/11/2006 1:36:15 AM
+2 Boost
UGLY...


BMWMPowerBMWMPower - 11/12/2006 4:42:01 AM
+2 Boost
Disgusting! Waste of time and effort, just like the R class. For the love of god if i want a wagon i'll get one... and if i feel the need to drive a truck (suv 4x4 or whatever lump of S_ _ _) i'll buy one... but this... no no no...


S4cabriofoxS4cabriofox - 11/12/2006 9:43:09 AM
+1 Boost
Tell that to the pretenders, who think anything with a BMW badge is beautiful.

AmazingBimmer and BMW_FAN won't even admit how ugly this is!

NO BMW FAN WANTS THIS TO BE BUILT! IT'S A MINIVAN!

It will be a sad day for the Bavarian Motor Werks...


BMW_DRVRBMW_DRVR - 11/13/2006 8:43:56 AM
+1 Boost
This is not ugly. The reason i hate the R-Class is because it looks too much like a mini van. This dosen't. It looks more like a SUV. If this is turned into the new X5 it will look alot better than the current X5.


TimETimE - 11/12/2006 7:25:51 AM
0 Boost
Guys, this is just an ugly Photoshop, and has nothing to do with a real deal.

Btw, V5 DOES NOT look like R-class. To get an idea how V5's general shape looks like check this Hyundai Genus concept (general shape of a huge coupeish hatch cum wagon):

http://auta5p.car.cz/vystavy/lipsko_2006/lipsko_073.jpg

And mind V5 will target European markets mainly, while Sport Activity Coupe X6 off-roadish coupe will aim at American buyers (to get an idea how X6 will look like check the Hyundai Talus concept: http://www.autogaleria.pl/tapety/img/hyundai/hyundai_hcd9_talus_2006_03_m.jpg ):











BavarianMotorradBavarianMotorrad - 11/13/2006 2:28:59 PM
+1 Boost
Was always just a matter of time before the thought of this monstrosity became reality .....


synxsynx - 11/13/2006 2:42:35 PM
+1 Boost
front looks too flat and headlights are too far apart and too small


TimETimE - 11/13/2006 6:43:31 PM
0 Boost
To: huu76

General design idea for BMW X6 & V5 is a very old idea. And, well, designers do shift jobs & companies. So going from BMW to Hyundai European Design Center is not so impossible like it sounds. ;-) And Hyundai is playing on "being first" card - to get some attention.

Who wants tall sports cars? Americans do. Marketing researches showed especially Americans wanted sport cars with commanding / high driving position. That's why BMW is creating SAC segment, and other carmakers will follow with their cars.

Genus = RX? I don't think so: Genus is much more like enlarged hatch / wagon, not a SUV. It's much lower than a SUV. Proportions are much different. And I'm talking about general shape not details!


TimETimE - 11/14/2006 2:09:38 AM
0 Boost
"Americans want tall sports cars? Name one."

Right now SAC is still non-existent, yet many new models will emerge in the near future by BMW, Infiniti, Porsche, Audi, MB, Alfa Romeo, VW, Ford, Acura, Saab, Hyundai etc.

Product planning strategists see trends you have no clue they are coming. SAC segment is one of them.

Btw, a few years ago we heard complaints who really needed sporty SUVs, cross-overs, 4dr coupes, compact SUVs, sporty MPVs, etc. And all the new products / segments have proven to be very successful. Why? Because the product planning was based on trend & market researches ... And latest ones predict SAC segment to be a real hit in the near future.



BMWMPowerBMWMPower - 11/14/2006 4:07:08 AM
+1 Boost
Are you on drugs! SUV's being decent cars? SAC being sporty? ON WHAT PLANET! It is impossible to have a sports car with a high driving position, it's called the laws of physics but judging that you like SUV's i'm sure you haven't got any idea.
A high driving position put simply for thick people like you compromises performance like nothing else, it raises the cars centre of gravity thus destorying that cars handling capability, not too mention the additional weight which in turn impacts the performance, breaking, acceleration and so on.
There is a good reason why even suped up SUV such as the Gemballa version of the Porsche Cayenne are inept performance cars. Your obviously american and probably think that the only thing that matters is driving in a straight line, well if so i hope you find a bend in a road and drive off the edge.


TimETimE - 11/14/2006 9:28:15 AM
+1 Boost
Wait to see (& drive) X6, and you will be VERY surprised how sporty can SAC be!






Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC