Koreans Widen Lead In JD Power 2019 Initial Quality Study - Japanese Falling Out Of Favor

Koreans Widen Lead In JD Power 2019 Initial Quality Study - Japanese Falling Out Of Favor
New-vehicle quality in 2019 stays flat compared with 2018, marking the first year without improvement since 2014, according to the J.D. Power 2019 Initial Quality Study (IQS),SM released today. More brands worsened than improved over the past 12 months.

“Automakers continue to make progress in areas like infotainment that attract a lot of consumer attention,” said Dave Sargent, Vice President of Global Automotive at J.D. Power. “However, some traditional problems crept up this year including paint imperfections, brake and suspension noises, engines not starting and the ‘check engine’ light coming on early in the ownership experience. Also, more people are having issues with their advanced driver assistance systems, which are critical for building consumer trust in future automated vehicles.”

Initial quality is measured by the number of problems experienced per 100 vehicles (PP100) during the first 90 days of ownership, with a lower score reflecting higher quality. In this year’s study, only 13 brands improved, while 18 worsened. The industry average remained unchanged at 93 PP100.

Following are key findings of the 2019 study:

  • Gap between Korean brands and others continues to widen: The three highest-ranking brands—Genesis, Kia and Hyundai—are all from Korean manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group, and the gap between these three brands and all others has widened considerably. Remarkably, 16 of 18 models from Hyundai Motor Group rank in the top three in their respective segments. These vehicles tend to perform especially well in the areas of infotainment and other electronic components.
  • Domestic brands above average: Ford (83 PP100), Lincoln (84 PP100), Chevrolet (85 PP100), Dodge (90 PP100) and Buick (92 PP100) all perform better than the industry average of 93 PP100. Overall, Domestic-branded vehicles perform close to the average in most areas.
  • All European brands are below average: In contrast to the success of the Korean automakers and the leading domestic and Japanese brands, all 10 European marques are below average. The largest gaps for the European vehicles are infotainment and other electronics.
  • Porsche 911 again achieves the best score of any model: The Porsche 911, with just 58 PP100, has the best score of any model for the second consecutive year.
  • Infotainment problems are decreasing: Infotainment remains the most problematic category for new-vehicle owners. However, this area is the most improved from 2018, led by fewer problems for voice recognition and Bluetooth.
  • Problems with driver assistance systems are increasing: As advanced driver assistance systems become more widespread and increasingly complex, more owners are indicating problems. The average for premium brands is 6.1 PP100, up from 5.0 last year, while the average for mass market brands is 3.5 PP100.
  • New and redesigned vehicles still trail carryover vehicles: Vehicles that were launched in 2019 have an average problem level of 103 PP100, which equals the best score ever. However, this is still well below the score for carryover models, which have an average problem level of 91 PP100.

Highest-Ranking Brands and Models

Genesis ranks highest in overall initial quality with a score of just 63 PP100. Kia (70 PP100) places second and Hyundai (71 PP100) ranks third. This is the second year in a row that the three Korean brands are at the top of the overall ranking, and it is the fifth consecutive year that Kia is the highest-ranked mass market brand. Ford (83 PP100) ranks fourth and Lincoln (84 PP100) ranks fifth, marking the first time both Ford Motor Company brands place in the top five in the same year.

Land Rover is the most-improved brand, with owners reporting 37 PP100 fewer problems than in 2018. Other brands with strong improvements include Jaguar (18 PP100 improvement), and Dodge and Volvo (each with 8 PP100 improvement). This is the highest Dodge has ever ranked in the study.

The parent corporation receiving the most model-level awards is Hyundai Motor Group (six awards), followed by General Motors Company (five);BMW AG (three); Ford Motor Company (two) and Nissan Motor Co. Ltd. (two).

  • Hyundai Motor Group models that rank highest in their respective segments are Genesis G70; Hyundai Santa Fe; Kia Forte; Kia Rio; Kia Sedona; and Kia Sportage.
  • General Motors Company models that rank highest in their segments are Cadillac Escalade; Chevrolet Equinox; Chevrolet Malibu; Chevrolet Silverado HD; and Chevrolet Tahoe.
  • BMW AG models that rank highest in their segments are BMW 2 Series; BMW X4; and MINI Cooper.
  • Ford Motor Company models that rank highest in their segments are Ford Fusion and Ford Ranger.
  • Nissan Motor Co. Ltd.models that rank highest in their segments are Nissan Maxima and Nissan Titan.

Other models that rank highest in their respective segments are Dodge Challenger, Lexus RX and Mercedes-Benz CLS.

Plant Quality Awards

Toyota Motor Corp.’s Cambridge North (Canada) plant, which produced the Toyota Corolla, receives the Platinum Plant Quality Award for producing vehicles with the fewest defects or malfunctions. Plant quality awards are based solely on defects and malfunctions, and exclude design-related problems.

Toyota Motor Corp.’s Tsutsumi 1 (Japan) plant, which produces the Toyota Prius and BMW AG’s Regensburg (Germany) plant, which produces the BMW 4 Series, X1 and X2, each receive the Gold Plant Quality Award for the Asia Pacific and Europe/Africa regions, respectively.

The 2019 U.S. Initial Quality Study is based on responses from 76,256 purchasers and lessees of new 2019 model-year vehicles who were surveyed after 90 days of ownership. The study is based on a 233-question battery organized into eight vehicle categories designed to provide manufacturers with information to facilitate the identification of problems and drive product improvement. The study was fielded from February through May 2019.









jtz7jtz7 - 6/20/2019 12:44:19 PM
-2 Boost
Yeah let's see how Dodge ends up 10 years later while it is above Toyota. But are we going to act like only Hyundai is that high and pretend that dodge also doesnt have issues?


DeutschlandDeutschland - 6/20/2019 12:34:09 PM
+8 Boost
90 days seems like a useless metric to me...I'm more interested to see whose cars last for the long haul...Will I have this car for ten years


jtz7jtz7 - 6/20/2019 12:45:26 PM
-2 Boost
I seen cars these days last 15 years. You never seen the 2006 Kia Sorento?


atc98092atc98092 - 6/20/2019 12:47:45 PM
0 Boost
I've had my Kia Niro for about 6 weeks, so too early to make a long term estimate. But so far everything has been flawless. The PHEV drivetrain works well, and the infotainment system is fine.


jtz7jtz7 - 6/20/2019 12:49:41 PM
0 Boost
I met to give you a thumbs up not thumbs down. Tricky finger. My bad


malba2367malba2367 - 6/20/2019 1:40:42 PM
+6 Boost
IQS has become a worthless study. Too much of it is related to people who have difficulty operating the infotainment systems and other tech in the car. The real study that matters is the VDS which actually relates to vehicle reliability. While Hyundai and Kia do well in the VDS, Toyota and Lexus are still at the top.


atc98092atc98092 - 6/20/2019 4:53:05 PM
+2 Boost
There's some benefit to an initial quality survey, but I agree they need to weight the results better. Issues with infotainment should not carry the same impact as mechanical (engine/transmission/suspension) issues.


TruthyTruthy - 6/20/2019 6:12:17 PM
+1 Boost
Dodge and Nissan above Toyota and Lexus?!? Agree that 90 days is one metric, however it is more important to see after 12 and 24 months. Interesting to see Jaguar/LandRover consistently at the bottom of all these surveys.
Indians never fix anything, always excuses.


TomMTomM - 6/20/2019 8:20:54 PM
+4 Boost
AS I have pointed out before - I would NEVER trust any of these customer survey style reports. THey too heavily depend on the memory and truthfulness of the people being surveyed. At the very least - repair data for the first 90 days- which should be minimal - should come from the dealer because all new cars sold in the USA would likely be under warranty - however - can you trust even a car manufacturer to supply completely accurate information when that could indicate problems with their cars that could affect sales.

I would want to see
1 - THE actual questions asked
2 - THe breakdown of the customers they actually did talk to
to at least see if the people they talked are representative of an owner's class.
3 - How they asked the questions - in person or a paper printed survey.

ANd since we already know that JD POWERS will not release that information - I would completely ignore this


MDarringerMDarringer - 6/20/2019 9:15:39 PM
0 Boost
paper?
in person?

Surveys are increasingly done online.


TruthyTruthy - 6/22/2019 11:27:07 AM
+1 Boost
J.D.Power methodology is very sound. Initial quality is not the only metric you should use, but it can be indicative of future problems.
If you have issues going out the factory you are more likely to have issues later.
The bottom of this list is populated by the same brands the show up on long term reliability lists.


MDarringerMDarringer - 6/22/2019 11:33:58 AM
+1 Boost
Oh God! Not this again: "...J.D.Power methodology is very sound...."

JD Power is in the BUSINESS of selling its endorsement. Thus, its BUSINESS CASE is predicated on perpetually having volatility in the "scientific results" of their "research". I'm sure even crappy Alfa Romeo has a JD Power endorsement.

JD Power has very little to do with reality and a whole lot to do with marketing cars.


Copyright 2026 AutoSpies.com, LLC