SHARE THIS ARTICLE

Ah, the 1980s: leg warmers, shoulder pads, and minivans that promised suburban bliss but delivered mechanical Armageddon. Enter the Ford Aerostar and Chevy Astro – twin abominations of sheet metal and shattered dreams. These weren't vehicles; they were rolling apologies from Detroit, designed to haul your screaming spawn while plotting your vehicular demise. Buckle up (if the belts don't snap), because we're pitting these rust-prone relics against each other in a comedy of errors. Spoiler: Nobody wins, but at least the breakdowns were entertaining.

Let's start with the Ford Aerostar, Ford's misguided stab at "innovative" family hauling. Debuting in 1985, this boxy beast looked like a Winnebago had a one-night stand with a station wagon. Under the hood? A wheezy 2.3L four-cylinder that sounded like a asthmatic chain-smoker tackling a hill. But the real stars were the transmission woes – slipping gears like a politician dodging taxes, leaving you stranded on I-95 with three kids and a cooler of warm Kool-Aid. Steering? A nightmare of coil springs perched on upper A-arms, turning every pothole into a drunken slalom. And rust? Oh, sweet rust – it devoured frames like Pac-Man on steroids, prompting Ford recalls and buybacks because nothing says "family safe" like your van dissolving mid-commute. Bonus fire hazard: Faulty ignition switches that turned your soccer shuttle into a rolling tiki torch. Who needs s'mores when you've got spontaneous inferno?

Now, flip the script to the Chevy Astro, GM's 1985 answer to "What if a pickup truck and a breadbox had a love child?" This AWD wannabe (optional, because why not add complexity?) guzzled oil like a frat boy at last call, with excessive consumption turning oil changes into hourly rituals. Doors? Those flimsy handles snapped off faster than a bad marriage vow, stranding you outside in the rain while your groceries tumbled free. Locks jammed like a bad plot twist, trapping families in a steel sarcophagus – escape via window? Sure, if the seals hadn't rotted. Power steering leaked like a sieve, and AWD models? Engine mounts wore out, gnawing the oil pan like a beaver on bath salts. ABS lights flickered warnings of brake module Armageddon, and rear AC? It wheezed its last breath before you hit Florida. Rust? Equal opportunity offender, but at least Chevy didn't buy 'em back – they just let Darwinism take the wheel.










Head-to-head, it's a tie in awfulness: Both sported seatbelts that laughed at crashes, fuel systems prone to "no-start" tantrums, and suspensions that turned highways into off-road rallies. The Aerostar edged in fire-prone flair, while the Astro won for "parts falling off mid-wave." Style? Both screamed "80s divorcee chic" – boxy, beige, and begging for mercy.

So, road warriors of yore: Which festering fossil scarred your soul more – the flammable Ford or the disintegrating Chevy? Drop your war stories in the comments: Aerostar arsonist or Astro amputee? Your vote decides the ultimate loser. 





VAN WARS! Chevy Astro vs. Ford Aerostar: Detroit’s Duel Of Disintegrating Dreams. WHICH Was WORSE?

About the Author

Agent001