One of the more painful experiences these days is reading what's left of the car magazines.
To me the quality and relevance gets worse month after month.
About the only excitement is trying to guess which ones won't exist a year from today.
So when I saw this article in Motor Trend as I was waiting for my Starbucks pour over to brew at the supermarket I was dumbfounded when i saw this article.
Instantly I said to myself that ONE of these vehicles isn't fit to be compared to the others from a DESIGN perspective only.
I say that becuase the article photo is shot outside of a design center so the question i posed is STRICTLY regarding EXTERIOR design.
The theme of the article is that it is a trio of three of the WEIRDEST cars albeit when was the BMW X6 called a car???
Here is just one quote from the article:
"All three vehicles are also patently absurd, in the very best possible sense of the word-so bizarre that we had to road-trip them to the only American city capable of standing up to this trio's epic level of whoa: Las Vegas."
Another quote I do not understand is about the CTS-V wagon.. "Prayers do get answered". Please tell me WHO on earth was praying for a Cadillac Wagon?
Or regarding the X6M... "Earns it M badge in every aspect save one: desireablity"
REALLY?
The X6M is NOT desireable?
What planet is THIS writer on?
That said I'm more interested to hear YOUR opinions...the people that actually matter.
So WHAT vehicle doesn't deserve to be on this page of the three?
Spies..discuss.
2011 BMW 1M NA Launch Photo Gallery
2012 BMW 6-Series NA Launch Cabo Photo Gallery
Porsche GT3 RS 4.0 Photo Gallery
2011 New York Auto Show Photo Gallery
New York Auto Show Preview Photo Gallery